If you had a choice of a monitor.
Would you go 4k (16:9) or a ultrawide (1440p) or a curved ultrawide? (1440p)
>>55452268
i got a 4k monitor and then later got a second. everyone that's advocating a 21:9 practically seems to revel in their fedora-ness.
>>55452268
M 4k
F curved ultrawide
K ultrawide
>ultrawide
>CURVED ultrawide
2560x2048
>>55452322
they are different with curved being significantly more expensive
>>55452268
I'd make sphere that surround me.
>>55452337
Yes, anon, that's right. Very good.
Why the fuck would any functional human even consider buying either?
640x480 14" CRT
>>55452365
there are people who made it to adulthood never having learned to fight the impulse to buy new toys. they see a 21:9 monitor, or a curved monitor, and they come to /g/ begging for our approval to buy it.
>>55452395
>posted from my 320x240 CRT
>>55452365
what would you buy then? some $100 20" gook tn panel off ebay?
>>55452404
i have some 4k monitors. at 24" they're not some crazy funhouse mirror version of a monitor that i'll get sick of in a year or two, and support for higher density displays is already ubiquitous within operating systems with non-shit desktop environments.
4k would be really nice, ultrawide is a serious luxury.
If youre really serious about gaming a 144hz ultrawide with freesync/gsync is going to be the better option, but don't bother going with a curved panel.
>>55452268
40"+ UHD is the way to go.
The only issue is that 120/144 Hz UHD won't be available until the end of the year in any size, so next summer for a 40"+ model best case.
