Only if you don't understand the code

>>55448806
Yes

We're all failures at some point. In the end, we fail to keep living.

>>55448806
All my programms are clusters of ripped off code snippets from stackoverflow.

Thank goodness for memory management and garbage collection

>>55448882
Well said

>>55448806
yes

>>55448806

No. There are plenty of successful web developers that leverage stack overflow's copy and paste feature.

>>55448806
No. Who the fuck doesn't. If all of your code from stack overflow then you have a problem.

Only johnny badass codes everything from scratch.

>>55448806
Yes, there is nothing with askimg for help online, but any meaningful answer will be to broad/vague to reply with code snippet

>>55448806
Isn't that what 99% developers do?

>>55448806
if you understand the code and maybe next time you reuse that and make something new with it, the answer is no.
If you build shit with snippets and sweat like a pig while googling around for snippets to save the day... then you are a fucking failure.

>>55449174

You cried. I know you did, onii-chan.

>>55448814
fpbp

literally took the words out of my mouth

>>55451147
ok, this was a stupid use of literally

If you need help with the logical aspect of the program itself, then potentially no. If you're straight up just forgetting syntax and shit, yes.

>>55451390
I would say the opposite. Syntaxes come and go, but the logic is pretty much the same.