>when someone recommends gimp as an alternative to photoshop
>can't even draw a fucking circle
literally the only time I use it to erase alpha channel
why cant mspaint into transparency?
>>55204057
pajeet, go away
>>55204057
>mfw someone recommends windows server as an alternative to centos
>mfw someone recommends LMMS instead of Reason
>>55204057
>to any image editor*
Gimp is just a pile of steaming human shit inside your boots
>>55204057
gimp has a learning curve but its totally worth it, just take a deep breath and just sacrifice those 10 horus to git gud
why do I never see Krita recommended? The GUI is much more intuitive and PS-like, has the features and generally looks good, outside of the welcome dialog making it look like a weeb/furfag wet dream
>When someone recommends cuckold open source over proprietary software.
>as an alternative to photoshop
Depends.
If it's just some retard wanting to do basic shit but he thinks he needs to pirate photoshop for it then yes, Gimp is a viable alternative.
>>55205356
Krita is for drawing. Photoshop for Image manipulation.
>>55204057
We don't describe free software as an “alternative” to proprietary, because that word presumes all the “alternatives” are legitimate and each additional one makes users better off. In effect, it assumes that free software ought to coexist with software that does not respect users' freedom.
We believe that distribution as free software is the only ethical way to make software available for others to use. The other methods, nonfree software and Service as a Software Substitute subjugate their users. We do not think it is good to offer users those “alternatives” to free software.
>>55205422
that's not a black and white distinction. Krita can do plenty of simple image manipulation
>>55205499
Fuck off communist cuck.
>when someone says you can do professional mechanical drafting, natively on linux
