Apt or pacman?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Apt or pacman?
Apt always.
Who gives a fuck? Neo /g/ everyone
>>55177366
What makes apt better?
>>55177391
>having no clue what different package managements mean
Neo /g/ everyone
>>55177254
zypper.
pacman is shit. AUR is shit. dpkg is shit
>>55177254
pacman
>>55177394
The dependency hell
Ubuntu packages and even whole DEs break when I compile from source a package I already installed
>>55177717
well duh
>>55177254
I feel like pacman aligns the text to be much more readable than what apt makes it. That's a good thing.
>>55177254
Apt with pacman output.
apt-get
>>55177624
that's a simplesudo apt-get remove
>>55177254
you just are really starting to trigger me now
just use PORTAGE you IDIOT
>>55177254
>he doesn't manually compile from source
Wew when did this place get so pleb?
>>55178217
when you got here
you FUCKING LOSER
dnf
*tips 360 and walk away*
YaST
>>55177254
ZYPPER MOTHERFUCKER!
>>55178389
desu this guy is 100% right
dnf is godly
F24 FUCKING WHEN
>>55178532
If its on schedual, tomorrow
>>55177624
Why the hell are you using the GUI shit?
>>55177254
Anyways, pacman.
pacman, apt is garbage
>>55177254
Emerge
>>55178698
So, month and a half in reality?
When was the last time a fedora release didn't face 1/+ delays?
