>>55115334
There's already a chinkphone available with an eink back. I think it's pretty neat.

And now for a link that isn't bullshit:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160514103858/http://www.wired.com/2016/05/get-ready-world-covered-electronic-paper/

>>55115334
get ready for roads of solar panels

oh wait...

>>55115893
E ink is neat, but isn't energy consumption an issue?

>>55115334
>proven wrong
Remind me what"/g/" was claiming?

>>55116503
e-ink is shit

>>55116533
/g/ has been begging for e-ink monitors, that huge e-ink tablet by Sony and e-ink phones. Is there another /g/ I don't know about?

>>55117083
make a thread to discuss e-ink readers and some faggot will tell you e-ink is crap.

>>55117120
As with every thread on /g/

>>55117120
because it is? have you ever actually used an eink display, it kind of sucks. Of course its going to get better, we all want it to get better. That's basically all that article is saying anyway. No one is arguing that.

>>55118011
E-ink sucks outside of its intended application.

>>55119421
>my car sucks at floating

>>55117083
>/g/ has been begging for e-ink monitors, that huge e-ink tablet by Sony and e-ink phones.
Shit seriously? I didn't know /g/ was this retarded

>>55119594
>Not having a boat car