I have a thing for slimming stuff down. It's fun to see how much fat can be cut & still have something work.
>>55000228
>I have a thing for slimming stuff down
>uses windows
>>55000239
It needs it. Pic includes .net 4.5
Now what to do next?
>>55000228
I can get a fully functional GNU/Linux system with x server running in under 70mbs, step up senpai
>>55000346
Duh, because linux is wonderfully modular and documented. Windows is more of a challenge.
Hilarious.
>>55000491
Distro, filesize, display server, WM/DE?
Anybody can take a kernel, statically linked copy of busybox & htop & call it light. But how functional is it?
>>55000547
>Distro
Gentoo.
>filesize
What?
>display server
X
>WM/DE
awesome
>But how functional is it?
see >>55000536
>>55000572
Sorry, playing in VMs, been counting file size for disk space. What is your install size?
>>55000228
last version that can be slimmed down is xp
>>55000595
Explain.
>>55000228
Start with Windows N Pro.
Disable telemetry settings, sc delete crap, remove getting started, all other apps, disable hiberfile and sysfile... update us
>>55000590
Without distfiles it's around 8 GB. Disfiles themselves take up 17 GB at the moment.
>>55000403
>I'm using Windows because it's a challenge
>>55000607
>Please help me I'm incompetent
Install Linux, you mook
>>55000668
This is an Enterprise VM. Already done what you've listed. Gutted universal shit (Mail is a surprisingly stubborn one to get rid of.), trimmed drivers down to just my machine's hardware and Hyper-V drivers, OS compression function, as well as NTFS's compression on the windows directory (as much as it would allow without fucking permissions).
>>55000706
I'm gutting windows because it's a challenge, and asked for an explaination as to why XP is the last slimmable version of Windows.