SSD fags BTFO
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You mad SSD fag? Who here /360 degree master race/?
HDD > SSD get over it and stop using this overpriced meme piece of shit called SSD
>>54961387
>having to defrag every two weeks
>having slow read/write times
>not having superior NAND flash memory
>moving parts become damaged over time
>>54961465
>having to defrag every two weeks
Are you downloading and deleting porn 24/7?
I think this is a trolling thread.
>>54961465
>Ext4
>I use sata 6 GB/s u dumb fick
>Then why do datacenters still use mag tapes
>Implying nand doesn't get damaged by writing
>>54961387
click click click
hear that, poorfag? it's the inevitable end of your mechanical drive,
HDDs can read at over 15000 RPM. SSDs barely even spin. Obviously HDD > SSD
Oh look it's the SSDs are a meme meme
>>54961523
>claiming there's a 6GB/s SATA interface
>calling others dumbfucks
>>54961542
DAMN that's an old meme
>>54961666
I hear there is breaking grounds in the SSD technology that is increasing the RPMs by a few hundred. Should be on the market within the year.
>>54961387
Ironically, the first commercial HDD was called "random access" because in comparison to tape, it was.
>>54961523
>Why do datacenters still use mag tapes?
Is you a datacenter, anon?
>>54961523
>thinks plugging a HDD into SATA 6 Gbit/s* gives him read/write speeds of 6 Gbit/s
lmaooooooooo
>>54961387
Maximum sequential read for most hdd is about 150mb/s.
Maximum sequential read for most sata ssd is about 400mb/s+.
PCI ones being even higher.
G O A W A Y
O
A
W
A
Y
>>54961523
>what is sticky-shed syndrome
rotational velocidensity
>>54961603
i heard that since the beggining 10 years ago now. no failures.
How ignorant are you? You probaly haven't used any ssd in your life because i dont want to go back
>>54961542
kek
>>54964034
My samsung rapid mode enabled goes up 4000 mb/s where your seagate goes up to 170 mb/s
>>54961387
i genuinely fucking hate what /g/ has become, the worst bit is this isnt even all that far from half the fucking threads on here now
>>54961523
On a 0 to 10 scale, you are very dumb
You're actually wrong OP.
>>54965179
What triggers me most is the barbaric writing system that uses commas to mean a decimal point. Holy shit that is eight different kinds of retarded.
>>54961504
Are you not?
>>54965463
kek, I was thinking the same thing. More upsetting than the wrong RPM
>>54964115
>rapid mode
RAPID mode is just a RAM disk managed by the Magician software, so of course it would destroy HDD speeds, it also destroys high-end NVMe drive speeds.
>>54961523
>ext4
>not btrfs
ITT: Fucking /b/ and /v/ retards
I only use SSDs to store my FLACs so they don't lose kbps over the years.
>>54967609
Am I being trolled right now? -.-
Wtf....? xD
>>54965463
>In Danish it's 1.000,0
>In English it's 1,000.0
It fucking infuriates me when I'm forced to write reports in Danish on source code I wrote in English.
>>54961542
I thought i smelled something DANK ITT
>>54961907
they still use tapes for longer term storage; archive and backup type
>>54961702
dude, SATA 3
>http://kb.sandisk.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/8142/~/difference-between-sata-i,-sata-ii-and-sata-iii
>>54967609
v0 masterrace
Why would I want a big cache, which is not attached directly to CPU?
>>54961465
>defrag
ahaha windows users are so funny
>>54967288
>btrfs
>not ext4
>>54961387
This is shit tier b8 why are you fags falling for this
Actually this is just shit positing. At least b8 has potential to be taken. Fucking hell /g/ you're officially normies
you cant be serious
your a dumbass beyond comprehension op
>>54961523
you seriously have to be trolling...
>Ext4
fill a Linux drive and tell me it doesn't fragment. If you think EXT4 is just some "magic" you're wrong. It just does it a lot different than NTFS.
>I use sata 6 GB/s u dumb fick
the funny thing is that you think you'll ever even get a fraction of those speeds with a spinning drive. SATA 3 has a BUS speed of 6 GB/s you're spinning drive is nowhere close.
>Then why do datacenters still use mag tapes
because spinning drives fail... tapes dont...
>Implying nand doesn't get damaged by writing
I've never been in a bumpy car and had read head crash into my magnetic platter and corrupt the data on my ssd. in fact i've dropped computers and phones with flash storage and there was never any data corruption.
you kids need to seriously stop believing every meme you hear on /g/
>>54967998
>>54967860
/Thread
>>54967998
not even the anon you're replying to, but you're saying something retarded and I felt the need to tell you
>fill a Linux drive and tell me it doesn't fragment
You have to fill the drive above 90% ; whereas NTFS will fragment even if you stay at, say, 15%
>not magic
yep, not magic, just clever space allocation
>it just does it a lot different
in such a way that is doesn't fragment unless you force it
>>54967692
Dude, SATA III is 8x slower than 6GB/s.
>>54968296
>Unless you force it.
by filling up your drive... (which never happens AMIRIGHT?)
it still fragments.... not like NTFS but it still fragments.
>>54968299
well shit I just google'd it, you're right
>>54961603
lol you realize that when an ssd crashes the data is un recoverable. when an hdd crashes a large protion of the data is recoverable. furthermore ssd's do not cope well with sudden power failure. furthermore ssd's degrade over time and lose sectors with each read /write. where as hdd the biggest problem in terms of degrading is from vibrations
>>54965179
You think electricity moves at light speed?
The optimum system is actually 2 hard drives.
1 ssd which is for performance. The operating system is installed onto this one.
and the other would be an extra large hdd which would be used for scheduled data back ups for when the sdd crashes and for storing things that don't require performance such as media.
>>54968682
it doesn't but it's a sizeable fraction of c (somewhere between 10^-2 and 10^-3), which is a lot faster than ~100 ft/s
>>54961465
>moving parts become damaged over time. technically speaking anything on this planet is moving and also when you run electricity through systems it causes slight amounts of movement. but i understand what you are saynig. how-ever light bulb would be considered in the same category as what you are saying and those eventually fail as well. ssd is actually called flash memory because it emits light i am the most neckbeard when it comes to this topic
>>54961387
hahaha poorfag
fags like you would use a stick over a fork just to pretend
>>54967609
>he doesn't know about bitrot
sorry anon, but your flacs will still degrade
>>54961387
Simply epic :)
>>54961542
i knew this was coming
>>54965179
>distance traveled doesn't matter at this size
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEpsKnWZrJ8
Except modern computers clock so fast that it there is an actual delay on accessing things due purely to the distance traveled by the signal in sub-billionths of a second.
A HDD killed my 970. Never trust those heavy metal murder machines if you can help it, anons.
>>54961387
keep trying, OP
>>54968465
>by filling up your drive... (which never happens AMIRIGHT?)
Right, it never happens. You never fill up the drive completely. Baka.
>>54968465
also
>it still fragments.... not like NTFS but it still fragments.
Have you ever checked the fragmentation level of an ext4 drive that has not been filled up completely nor "defragmented" ever?# tune2fs -l /dev/sda2 | grep created
Filesystem created: Sat Aug 2 10:28:36 2014
# fsck -fnv /dev/sda2|grep contig
e2fsck 1.42.13 (17-May-2015)
10 non-contiguous files (1.2%)
3 non-contiguous directories (0.7%)
how do you dare to compare this to NTFS is beyond me.
>>54961666
> HDDs can read at over 15000 RPM
Yeah if you don't mind your neighbours asking why you have a jet engine stored in your study.
>>54965179
Please re-read the SI-brochure
>>54967998
>actually responding seriously to an obviously memeing anon
>people are actually taking OP seriously
>>54965463
can agree
t. german
>>54974329
>>54973394
so? even a 5.400 RPM HDD spins an order of magnitude faster than any SSD
>>54967639
triggered
>>54965463
Does it matter?
It's an arbitrary thing for the most part.
A bit like caring about which side of the road people drive on or which power sockets they use.
There really isn't an objective best way.
>>54967640
consign them all to the dark ages it's not worth draggin them along any further
>>54975280
>using a comma is contrary to the standard usage
>there is an engineering consensus that some plugs are significantly safer than others
You're a philistine
