>anyone else experiencing X issue?
>nope, Works on My Machine™
>>54950015
not unironically using wayland
>>54952950
which distros support wayland?
>>54950015
>Year of our Lord 2016
>Not just using up dog
>>54950015
The bottom line is if your using linux something is probably broken.
>>54952969
nearly all of linux, depends on wayland compositor though and ability to switch to wayland (should be an option on the dm)
list of compositors:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_display_servers#Wayland
i've seen GNOME start to bring wayland
>>54952989
i mainly use xubuntu and i heard xfce wasn't going to support it
>>54953004
yeah it mostly means to rewrite the entire project.
what's the problem with x?
>"sounds like a you problem"
I dunno what people are trying to imply when they say this but it makes me want to kill, anyone else experience this?
>>54952982
What's up dog?
>>54953022
i'm not op, i don't have a problem with it personally. i was just wondering about wayland support
>>54953060
Nm. What's up with you?
>>54953064
if you want to be trapped under ubuntu shit, there's also Mir
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Mir
but that's for unity touch or whatever
i think OP means X as algebra..
>anyone experiencing _____ issue?
but srsly X is fugged my shit up, esp. with that amd + ubuttjoo dropping all GPU/APU made before the current year.
>>54953094
>when linux users get confused with algebra and ancient display server
in my opinion there needs to be better compatibility to hardware, even in fucking windows
graphics can be a pain
printers and mDNS needs to be better
>>54953084
yeah unity wasn't for me. all the fancy distros i've tried so far were either intuitive or buggy as fuck. i might try out mate or gnome classic
>>54953299
unintuitive*
>>54953073
>>54953060
>>54952982
>samefag
Never mind, solved it!
"thanks it worked for me"
