Advertisers are trying hard to keep people from using adblock, including anti-adblock programs, but that's like playing a game of whackamole.
Consider this: What if ad companies gave a share of the ad revenue to the users, essentially rewarding them monetarily for simply not using adblock? Would that convince people to disable adblock? Would you disable adblock for that?
/biz/-tier idea
>>54918301
They already do that. And no it doesn't work because theyll give you a penny for every 1000 they make.
>>54918301
I don't want ads period. I am also gainfully employed.
I think brave web browser is supposed to do that at some point.
>>54918301
i don't block ads, just don't request them
jews won't ever will give you money for looking at ads, and even worse, they would have to track every site you visit so they could "pay" you... so not gonna happen.
>hurr hurr brave
watch it fail miserably.
>>54918301
>10 cents per month for getting raped by ads.
Thats not really a feasible deal since Id pay 10 cents per month to be ad free.
>>54918301
>What if ad companies gave a share of the ad revenue to the users, essentially rewarding them monetarily for simply not using adblock?
then you'd have people like us running a dozen VMs with a script that browses the web automatically to collect shekels
then a bunch of people would do this and advertisers would quit paying
>>54918358
They are.
Can't psyche the Eich.
>>54918359
this
networks are push/pull
the web happens to be pull
not pulling certain stuff is in no way against any rules
