AMD POORFAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkiZdSBux9E
>>54844999
Where's 290/X? Or 390?
Kek
>>54845058
aren't 290/x discontinued, 390/x are basically 290/x rebranded with more vram
>>54844999
>480X will have GTX 980 perf for $200 and will be announced in about an hour
checkmate novideofags
>>54844999
what, no RX 480?
Meanwhile the base 380 and 390 both beat the 1070 price:perf.
I can't even imagine how hilariously bad the 480 or 490 will make it look.
>>54844999
The RX 480 is going to be top of every price/perf chart for years if it's truly $200. Enjoy your moment, Nvidiot.
>>54844999
>Tomb raider
for fuck sake, why are they still make those ?
thats like the 30th tomb raider
>>54845123
Yes
So you can get 290x performance for half the price of a 390x. Essentially the value of that line on the chart should be divided by 2
Isn't this game Nvidia flagship "the way it's meant to be played"?
>>54845417
it's been an hour
well?
ONE-HUNDRED-AND-NINETY-NINE US DOLLARS
>>54845532
>290x performance for half the price of a 390x
maybe if you get a used card that was used for shitcoin mining
>>54845018
linking linus tech tits
good lord go fuck yourself you gay bitch
>>54846530
its on right now
>>54844999
Is this the damage control thread?
Ok, riddle me this. The 1070 cant do actual 4k games, so why would I buy an overkill card for just 1070? I mean, if I wanted 4k I would totally buy 2 1080s, but why the fuck would I buy a 1070? Just to overkill 1080 but not to be enough for 4k?
Frankly Id either go for a cheaper 1080 card or a super expensive 4k one.
>>54846585
link
>>54846623
>The 1070 cant do actual 4k games, so why would I buy an overkill card for just 1080p?
typo
>>54846625
its like you literally did not read a single post
>>54846530
An hour later AMD just anally annihilated you.
>>54846623
it's better price/perf if you can't afford a 1080, while still having better performance than amd shit, and it's not overkill for e.g. high refresh rate and low latency csgo at 1080p-1440p
>>54846671
>>54846683
fuck you there was no link to it at all
here i googled it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Icm9B1nkGJ0
FUCK YOU
>>54846761
Good job it's almost like you're an adult now.
>>54846761
theres a thread on it right now
nvidia just got btfo
2 rx480s beat a 1080 and its 200 cheaper
>>54846812
multi gpu has an extra frame of latency and is dependent on game/driver support, any oldfag knows you're supposed to have one high end gpu, it's ridiculous to compare multi gpu to single gpu
>>54846862
buttmad nvidiot.
>>54846891
stay delusional amd tard, you don't have simultaneous multi-projection, g-sync and fastsync, you got completely rekt
>>54846862
>tfw hd5770 crossfire
It just werks
2 rx 480 is $20 more expensive than gtx 1070 and has higher power consumption
>>54846761
why the fuck does that fucking shit auto-scroll to the top of the page so i cant type in the chat
B T F O
>>54846862
Except we aren't talking about oldfag shit here, Faggot. DX12 brings CF/SLI into the light again.
>>54846965
it's fucking gjewgle man
make the window bigger if you have a high res screen
>>54846964
but its better
>>54846921
>gsync
>paying extra when you could just get freesync
stop giving jewvidia money for ruining gaming
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcF36_qMd8M
>>54847003
TOP KEK comparing 2x gpu vs single gpu and it's fucking ashes, fucking overhyped shit benchmark "game", heavily biased toward amd, grasping at straws this hard
>>54847023
freesync is objectively inferior to gsync and kliksphilip is not exactly an expert
>>54846812
are you serious? you are saying that it takes 2 AMD cards to beat a single nvidia card and you post that as something good?!
>>54844999
THIS JUST IN.
THE 480 AT 199$ @ 5 TERAFLOPS
NVIDIA SHILLS ON LITERAL SUICIDE WATCH!
>>54847003
Unless every single game supports CF at release and they never again fuck up their drivers or we get the whole industry to support DX12 very soon(a month or two) comparing CF with a single GPU isn't even apples&oranges tier of retarded.
>>54845532
price for performance is based on the price of NEW cards.
>>54847105
gtx 1070 shits all over it at $379, most people can afford a gtx 1070, same story as the gtx 970, the gtx 970 is the most popular card among steam users
>>54847088
when two amd cards are still cheaper than 1 card and out performs it, yeah its a good thing.
nvidiots suicide watch lol
>>54847088
>Set of cards for $400 that beats a single $800 card
Yes, this is a good thing. Weren't all you nvidiots touting about how SLI 970s were the greatest setup ever.
>>54847160
>double the price
kek
>>54847164
delusional as fuck
heck you could get dual gtx 1060 when they come out, it would still be retarded to do multi gpu two low/mid range cards but it would still be better than dual 480
>>54847193
the equivalent of gtx 970 sli in the current year would be gtx 1070 sli, not fucking 480 crossfire
>>54847204
>dual 1060s
you can look at the 980 vs 960 and know thats false
>>54847105
>same price as last year
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOW
>>54844999
>1070 will be $400
>2 RX 480s will be $400
>2 RX 480s beats 1080
wew lads
>>54847290
>in a the most biased benchmark you could possibly find
kys idiot
>>54847308
>gameworks kike juju isn't bullshit
Okay faggot
>>54847290
Third party 1070s will be 350-380 and only a retard would buy the card without a bundle.
>>54847337
too bad Battlefield will be AMD bundle
>>54847337
this and the perf just shits all over a single 480, only newfags think it's good to do multi gpu with low end cards, it's better to get a single mid range card or high end card and perhaps upgrade more often
>>54847251
It wouldn't. the 1070 doesn't even touch the 970 price/performance
>>54847406
have you looked at the OP pic?
>>54847193
>>54847164
and 2x 1080´s or 2x1070 or whatever would beat that, the point being?
Your whole argument is money, not playing around with combo cards that can achieve something in a very specific game.
You are forgetting the real message behind this. AMD is falling behind in tech and has no answer for the 1080, if they did, you can bet they would have announced it. AMD just implicitly announced they are retiring from the enthusiast segment.
But hey, gratz on your solution, its ok but for the segment (casuals that do crossfire),
if you can afford dual 480 you can afford a gtx 1070 with money to spare, gtx 1070 is the obvious buy in that situation
>>54847406
The 1070 is basically a Titan X for a quarter the price just like the 970 was to the Titan.
>>54847475
>and 2x 1080´s or 2x1070 or whatever would beat that, the point being?
Cost faggot. It cost way less.
Do you think this matters
Rx 480
>>54847589
its Intel vs AMD status quo on GPUs.
AMD is trailing techwise and forced to offer price attractive options, where only true nerds that study the price points will design the optimal price/performance buy.
>>54846576
>>54847144
well, yes, of course, but in the real world this kind of performance has been available to people who shopped smartly for over a year now. I'm glad it's mainstream again
>>54847828
>buy a used 2-3 years old amd card
>smart shopping
>>54847811
No this is polaris. Vega is still going to compete with the 1080.
But its hilarious that polaris can beat a 1080 already
Isn't the chart showing the pioneer edition price?
I imagine that chart will be even better when regular editions starts showing up in the market.
>>54848010
yeah it's probably using the founder's edition price at $449, it'll be even better at $379
>>54848010
>>54848055
There will not be a single 1070 for $379 this year.
>>54848074
More like GTX $1070.
>>54845417
970 perf And it's called RX480 faggot
>>54847290
>AoS
>a valid benchmark
No. Just no.
>>54848074
the asus strix 1080 is $619 at launch, only $20 over MSRP and it's more or less a premium card, the asus strix gtx 970 was more expensive than other gtx 970 cards
MAYBE if there are supply issues it will be above $379 initially but sooner or later prices will fall even below $379 for competitive reasons, it's better to sell bigger quantities because you're a bit cheaper than the competition
>>54848159
It's £699.98 which is about $1000.
http://www.novatech.co.uk/products/components/nvidiageforcegraphicscards/nvidiagtx1080series/Asus/STRIX-GTX1080-O8G-GAMING.html
>>54848245
nvidiot btfo
AMD´s answer when their tech falls behind: add more cheap cores and blame developers for not optimizing, we have seen this before.
>>54847902
With your line of reasoning Kepler beats Polaris..
Btw, if you are an AMD fan but dont like Ashes of Singularity you are fucked
>>54848245
bongland pricing is irrelevant and it's a preorder
>>54848159
>he actually believes MSRP
>>54847851
>buy used card for $200
>slap a good cooler on it and OC a small bit
>can play witcher 3 at 1440p 60fps
got nothing to complain about desu. I was smart and got a great value card.
Where are all the nvidiots, suddenly so quiet
>my wallet
>>54848374
A bunch of shills just got banned for spamming
>>54848374
i seriously hope you don't buy the 480 at retail pricing
Dear NoVideos,
RX480 is $199. You lose. :3
Love, AMDestroyers.
>>54848386
how about no
>https://www.4chan.org/bans
it's amazing what delusions you'll come up with to justify being an amd fanboy
>>54848394
kill yourself retard
gtx 1070 probably has even better price/perf in any game except for maybe shitty shit overhyped fucking ashes
>>54848409
>Below is a sample of recent bans (not a comprehensive list of all bans), updated once per hour.
NVIDIOTS are CLEARLY on suicide watch.
>>54848435
I can smell your European butthurt from here in America
>>54844999
>new tech is better than old tech
>>54848409
That only shows what the mods want to show, they won't show anything that provokes a shitstorm
How new are you?
>>54848458
almost no one gets banned from /g/, you have no evidence that shills got banned or that there are any (paid) shills
>>54848475
you have NO proof, the only "shills" ITT are me and and a few other anons and i'm certainly not banned, stay delusional idiot
>>54848496
Because your shilling isn't blatant spamming like the ALL CAPS guy in the Computex threads
>>54848390
Have titan x/4k, waitin for pascal vs vega.
Tfw could power 5x 480s for that price
Vega 32gb hbm2 is lookin good
Reason for Nvidias early release is now revealed, theyre lagging a whole generation behind
>>54844999
>Comparing past gen hardware with newly released hardware
You're pretty retarded, aren't you, OP?
>>54848543
if anything it's amd that's lagging behind obviously, they have nothing to compete with 1070/1080 until MAYBE late Q3-Q4 2016, but they probably didn't even think of the multi-projection stuff, and nvidia will come out with 1080 ti around that time to BTFO vega
>>54848543
also
>Vega 32gb hbm2
hbm is a complete waste at this point, it kills price/perf just look at fury x, nvidia does fine with gddr5/x
>>54848585
480x/crossfired beats 1080, priced lower than 1070
AMD changed their gen rythm and strategy towards an incremental steady killing to suffocate the higher end
6 years ago evergreen beat fermi which led to amd buying ati
We've yet to see how nvidia prices the HBM2, considering amd has an edge on stocks and tech handling
Incoming clash
>>54848669
you're delusional, retarderd, or both
>>54848610
The bandwidth is needed for 4k 120hz to push 8k
>>54848681
Nothing is impossible man
>>54844999
>a $350 card released in 2016 outperforms a $1,000+ card from 2015
There is literally no reason to ever fall for the high end video card meme. NO REASON.
>>54848824
980 ti wasn't bad if you could afford it and it's still a good card, and 970 had great price/perf around the same price as 1070
>>54848824
Same as the 970 slightly outperformed the Titan.
>>54848824
Having the best is worth it "zero fucks given"
It's like reaching the highest level on WoW, then the real game starts
Which is 4k video for me :)
>>54849111
>Having the best is worth it "zero fucks given"
And how about those 3 months after you buy it when something better and/or cheaper comes out? It's not worth it.
>>54849111
yep and life is short if you can afford to spend a little extra why not, and there are more expensive hobbies and people drop a lot of cash on tv's and cars etc why not a graphics card or two
>>54847003
Except Crossfire was always broken, and Ashes of the Singularity is a shitty game that AMD has been touting because MUH ASYNC.
>>54848277
Kepler beats Maxwell in lots of compute tasks. It gets shit on in OpenCL computing stuff by AMD, but then again, if you're doing compute on NVIDIA, you do CUDA.
I want to see a comparison of compute performance between Pascal and Polaris. Who gives a fuck about gaymes?
>>54848356
>spend $200 on a USED card and at least $100 worth of effort and the fuckface shitter lottery on whether your ram chips are fried as fuck from buttcoin mining 24/7 plus getting a new cooler and 1000w PSU
>That and hoping to fuck you don't bungle the cooler unmounting/remounting considering the amount of retarded shit you see on /g/ everyday
>That instead of spending an extra $80 on an infinitely faster card because it's GREEN
>Worth it
Oh Amturds never cease to make me laugh
