Who was right?
>>54843478
The FBI, obviously. Apple was just trying to leverage the situation for marketing purposes. "Buy our phones everyone, we ""care"" about your privacy! (until the point when we realise we can use data about you to sell more iAds :P )"
Utter cunts. Holding up a police investigation to catch two MURDERERS for the sake of their bottom line. Such a stunt should be illegal.
>>54843478
The fbi, because even if someone owns the device the software on it and all the data is legal property of apple making it apples responsibility
>>54843478
It doesn't matter who was right, apple products are compromised either way. If they can't even defend you against some federal agents barely able to use internet explorer then you can't expect to be protected against hackers who deploy large scale malicious attacks through hardware and software backdoors.
I sold my iphone 6s on ebay when I heard about the FBI breaking into that iphone. Some other dumb fuck can have that poorly secured piece of shit.
>>54843478
Applel, they support freedom more than Microshaft and Jewgle.
>>54843694
No, they don't give a shit about your freedom. They pretend that they do but they really don't.
That "we care about your privacy guys XD, promisss" was just a PR stunt.
>>54843678
podunk savants glowering at the horrible weather in some backwoods town in the middle of some godforsaken second world country dont ask nicely
the FBI essentially did
to put it another way, if the US government can do it, anybody can
>>54843739
>No, they don't give a shit about your freedom. They pretend that they do but they really don't
The give more of a shit that MS and Google though.
>>54843478
Applel, as allowing the US government to force companies to develop and sign malware for them would have killed the US tech sector.
>>54843478
Apple of course.
Once you put a backdoor into a piece of software, every hacker in the world is going to find it and use it.