Yeah you
Download chrome
Import everything from firefox
Uninstall firefox
Nothing of value was lost
Keeps saved passwords, history, everything
Does Tree Style Tabs work on Chrome?
>not using Microsoft Edge
>>54812403
epik
>>54812415
No vertical tabs options at all
You can't make it not look like shit either. Firefox and SeaMonkey are the only good browsers that still receive updates.
>chrome
No thanks
does freedom and privacy work on chrome?
>>54812403
>Nothing of value was lost
But I value not getting data mined by 666 parties
>chrome
not even once
>>54812593
Guys, what's wrong with chrome? (retard here)
I didn't wanna make my own thread so I thought I'd ask here.
AdBlockPlus doesn't work anymore on my chrome. This just happened 10 minutes ago (ads started playing before and in between every video). I searched FAQ and couldn't find a solution. What do? Pls halp.
>>54812627
Install uBlock
>>54812531
>still no addons
What are those guys even doing?
How can you fuck up this much?
>>54812539
Embrace the botnet and you won't need those anymore.
>>54812649
Ayyy. Thanks laddie. 31 ads blocked from youtube in 5 seconds.
If I may, let me bend your ear for another second.
Why or why not should I use chrome?
>>54812534
>seamonkey
I dont understand this meme
>>54812531
>using a browser developed by a company that puts spyware and bloatware on all their products
No
Just no
>>54812655
They're trying to figure out how to monetize them.
But not addons and not being part of the botnet faggot
>>54812403
how about I use whatever I want?
Tell me how to stop Chrome phoning home. I don't care if it's 'legit-shit', I can disable all of it in Firefox (heck most of it is even documented) but Chrome want's to contact Google whenever it can.
>>54812713
What meme?
If someone tolf me how to fix the immense lagging I exprience when opening 4chan and other large sites on ff I would actually use it more.
kill yourself
I just moved from chrome to Pale Moon.
I like it.
>Luakit's last release was September, 2012
Why am I even alive any more.
>>54812771
pitch it to me
>>54812403
>Chrome
>not even Chromium, just fucking Chrome
What the fuck is wrong with you? Do you like getting buttfucked by Google?
>>54812792
>buttfucked by Google
explain
>>54812785
Firefox with all the shit removed.
Can use most firefox addons.
Painless to move stuff from your last browser to pale moon.
>>54812403
>Nothing of value was lost
except for my freedom
>>54812823
What would you say is the most optimal web browser available? With kike spyware and selling data etc. taken into consideration?
>>54812403
>Nothing of value was lost
1. my freedoms
2. can't connect to my selfhosted sync server anymore
no thanks
>>54812876
>my freedoms
explain this meme
>>54812809
Chrome is literally a botnet.
It's not even some dumb meme, it actually sends all of your info to Google.
>there's people that still dont know about this
>>54812896
>there are people that still don't know the difference between a botnet and datamining
>>54812887
I don't want to send my personal data to google.
>>54812896
>>54812909
>>54812913
Where is the danger there? What's the worst thing that could happen? I look at relatively tame porn and rip audio from youtube videos. Am I gonna get v& if I use chrome or what? Not being sarcastic, these are genuine questions.
>>54812792
>Chromium
>not Google Ultron
Do YOU like getting buttfucked by Google?
>>54812923
If you're okay with big brother watching your every move then by all means continue using Chrome like the dumbass you are.
>>54812936
>Google Ultron
>not using the vastly superior Google Skynet
>>54812923
>Am I gonna get v&
No, but it's a matter of principles.
In Germany we call it "Informationelle Selbstbestimmung".
>>54812940
Well I never said I wasn't a dumbass. I just wanted the wise word of an eperienced /g/ynecologist. Which browser would you say is best?
>>54812957
Hang in there Germany.
>>54812973
SeaMonkey
>>54812987
What makes it more optimal compared to Firefox let's say?
>>54813006
It's an application suite like a browser should be and doesn't suffer from the RAM issues that Firefox does
>>54813021
But isn't SeaMonkey "unofficial" like, ran by a userbase or community or whatever? That, in your opinion, doesn't make it less... good? Like, would you say that's good versus Firefox which is owned by a company?
>>54812403
Are: NoScript, RequestPolicy continued, ABP Start Video Assistant, HTTPS Everywhere available on Chrome? Is there a Grease Monkey equivalent, SOCKS support, and importantly (especially if there's no SVA or equiv) can I set the VP9 decoder to FFVP9 instead of Google's libvpx-vp9 decoder?
>>54812695
Botnet
>>54813034
>But isn't SeaMonkey "unofficial" like, ran by a userbase or community or whatever?
Yes
>That, in your opinion, doesn't make it less... good?
Not in the slightest.
>Like, would you say that's good versus Firefox which is owned by a company?
I couldn't give less of a shit either way, I just care about which end product is best, which is SeaMonkey.
>>54813057
Gotcha.
>>54813063
The end result being the only thing that matters is a logical thought. But would SeaMonkey being ran by a community be, like, less consistent vs Firefox? Like regarding security updates and such?
>>54813084
>But would SeaMonkey being ran by a community be, like, less consistent vs Firefox? Like regarding security updates and such?
I honestly don't care about that either, only which is best. Fuck my main browser is three years old and I continue to use it because I find it superior to the alternatives. That's not too much to worry about with SeaMonkey, it regularly receives updates.
>>54813096
Thanks for spoonfeeding me mate. I'm in the dark regarding this type of shit.
One more question, what's the best adblock for SeaMonkey?
>>54812823
Does it suffer from ram raping?
>>54812403
Botnet
>>54813113
No problem, and I can't help you in that regard, I just use it as a backup browser and NoScript along with my router's adblocking is enough for the few times I fire it up. Whatever you'd use with Firefox should work though, it's compatible with a lot of Fx extensions and a lot that aren't can be converted to be compatible with SeaMonkey.
>>54812823
Still no html5 support
Last time I ask around on the forum they told me to stick with fucking flash instead
>>54813154
Alright I guess I'll dick around with Firefox before I get SeaMonkey and go from there. Firefox is decent though right? At least as a pleb's alternative to Chrome?
Give a version of chrome without botnet, that can look EXACTLY like pic related and that has a good and complete RSS reader addon and i will change.
>>54813176
Yeah Firefox is the next best choice
>>54813194
Thanks man.
>>54813188
How can you make it become like this?
Can you share your config?
>>54812403
>not using lynx
seriously though, what sucks about firefox is its flash/html5 support, it's really fucked how bad it is at playing videos.
what's good though: rikaisama. the only reason i use it.
>>54813213
FT DeepDark+OneLiner
>>54813113
I'm using Icedragon as browser, and it comes with a really nice adblock, called Bluhell Firewall, would recommend it to seamonkey if it's possible to use it there
>>54813326
You mean you'd recommend it over SeaMonkey?
I like the webdev Addons in Firefox more. Besides Chrome breaks the Addons I'm using when it updates almost every time... Never touch a running system... Problem is chrome touches it self instate of running :>
>>54812403
>Chrome's tab+address bars literally, unironically take up twice as many vertical pixels as they do in firefox
No thanks.
>>54813356
I'm talking about the adblock, think you can use it on all browsers, but I prefer Icedragon in front of Seamonkey, yes, it looks a lot better, problem is that it uses a lot of ram, I have 32GB so I doesn't matter for me though
>>54812403
But I can't make chrome look like this
>>54812403
Are you willing to pay me?
>>54813427
Oh ok, we're on the same page. Thanks for your two-cents lad.
Don't tell me what to do.
>>54812403
Just wait for servo (tm)
>>54813556
fucking hell that font is horrible.
>>54812403
Pentadactyl doesn't exisdt on chrome, retard.
>>54814180
actually there is a similar addon
But I'll get tearing on linux
>>54812534
>Firefox and SeaMonkey are the only good browsers that still receive updates.
im not sure of the reason but recent ff and sometimes even sm crash when loading some pages, it may be something on my end but i dont remember this happening before
>>54813006
it is the true successor of netscape navigator
>>54813034
>But isn't SeaMonkey "unofficial" like, ran by a userbase or community or whatever?
supposedly so, which is good because
>remains consistent
>no random "improvements" like in newer ff
>>54813160
what do you mean?
ffmpeg is used as of 42 or 43
Sadly no Vimperator for chrome...
>>54812695
make sure it's uBlock Origin, not just uBlock
>>54812695
pros: just werks
cons:botnet and uses a fuckload of ram
>>54812415
First post
Best post
Fuck not having tree style tabs.
>>54813570
It uses up towards 500mb ram when you're watching YouTube etc.
800mb when you have a lot of things up.
Firefox is slow as shit. Uses up so much more computation power when loading a page compared to chromium based. Powered by sjw niggers with a feminist objective to grind.
Chrome is a privacy nightmare and cancer. Literally powered by botnet server. Extensions and shit are limited. You can't launch external programs from your addon (mpv addon for example). Flash or video playback has issues.
Dum Chrome question
Can I make it so that i can open a new tab (through dragging the link up top) and have it open the tab but not switch to it?
>>54812717
If you already use spyware OS, why wouldn't you use spyware browser as well?
>>54813021
>doesn't suffer from the RAM issues that Firefox does
Eh? In my experience SeaMonkey always uses more RAM than Firefox.
Also, I didn't check it myself but I heard it has some compatibility problems with Firefox addons.
>>54813188
>that can look EXACTLY like pic related
Chromeslaves will never understand this, anon. They honestly believe that corp knows better what they should use and no one should be allowed to have custom things.
mfw no one in this chat is using lynx, LOL it must suck to be this casual
>>54812784
god I would kill myself if I worked in a cubicle office
>>54815056
just middle click or ctrl+l.click the link you're trying to open
>>54812403
>>54812531
No thank you
>>54815339
Irrelevant since all Firefox addons and themes will become incompatible with newer versions of Firefox once they introduce Google Chrome's extensions API.
>>54812403
>>54813188
2016
Not using Edge with dark theme
>>54812415
>>54812534
>>54814906
>Not googling for a second.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/sidewise-tree-style-tabs/biiammgklaefagjclmnlialkmaemifgo?hl=en
>>54815689
>implying I care about newest Firefox
My current version (34) works just fine.
I still use chrome but I want to move to Firefox, the only reason I haven't is because I love the 4chan x extension, is there an equivalent on Firefox?
>>54815739
Nah, no such thing. They also didn't put firefox version before chrome one on their github page. Why would you ever think there can be 4chan-x for firefox?
This last update to Chromium made me like it more, I hate that I like material design so much. I wish the was proper NoScript extension for chromium based browsers.
>>54815752
Alright mate enough with the sarcasm, I didn't get it from the git hub page I got it from chrome extentions. Thanks anyway.
>>54812403
I already used Chromium for a couple of weeks. It wasn't too bad, but font rendering is worse than on FF, there is no Tree Style Tabs and some website didn't work at all, so I switched back to FF. Still as comfy as ever.
>>54815739
>>54815752
But I'm using 4chan x via greasemonky on firefox...
>>54815738
Then I suggest you start forking those addons. Two more versions and you might as well be using Chromium...
>>54815752
>>54812695
Pros: easy to use, works fine
Cons: Google, botnet, no privacys
> he does it for free
>>54815870
Haluan nussia söpö suomalainen perse.
>>54812403
What about Chromium?
>>54812655
>still no webm support
What year is this?
>>54812896
Can you prove this? Prove it conclusively and the masses may care. Don't speculate. Don't point to crash reporting and anonymous telemetry. Prove that Chrome is collecting and storing personal data without consent.
>>54812403
Poo in the loo, rajesh
I wish I could just change browsers that easily.
>>54814491
Even if they crash occasionally they're still better than Chrome.
>>54815339
That's odd, I've always had SeaMonkey use far less RAM. I don't think I've ever seen it break 500MB actually.
>>54815737
>top tab bar is still there
>it's basically a window next to your Chrome window that switches tabs for youi
fucking kek, this is the poorest excuse for a vertical tab bar I've ever seen. I know it exists and don't post it because it's one of the most moronic things ever.
>>54812823
>most
lol
pentadactyl is better than vimperator I'll give it that though
mpv+youtube-dl is very valuable
>>54815301
>why shoot yourself in the foot when you can shoot yourself in the dick
>chrome
>crxGestures not properly working with links
>chrome does not allow extensions to create windows greater than 500xSomething
>can't add scrollbar do dropdown bookmarks
>no selfdestructing cookies (inb4 umatrix -> only deletes cookies every 15 minutes)
>no freedom
>can't sync to my own servers
>chrome is so botnet I think I would rather use edge
>>54812534
>Firefox
>Good browser
>>54813113
UBlock Origin is what you should use on SM; it's what I use on SM.
>>54817935
It's one of the two best that still receive updates. I'm not saying Firefox is amazing, just that it's better than everything else.
>>54817960
>I'm not saying Firefox is amazing, just that it's better than everything else.
This. Firefox is shit but it's still the best, at least for someone who isn't a computer illiterate.
>>54816356
Why has nobody responded to this simple inquiry. All talk, no walk.
>>54812403
>UI looks like crap
>Does not fit in with any OS or theme
>No ability to change it
Literally why
>>54818053
Because we all know it's true, we're not going to bother with some dipshit in denial.
>>54817912
>Chrome is a botnet so I'd rather use another botnet while running my botnetOS
Just go back to plebbit
>>54818087
I'm not in denial I think they collect info just like everybody is but I have nothing to go by besides blind belief. It doesn't really matter what most of /g/ thinks but I guess always assume the worst baka.
>>54818202
wtf i didnt say baka i said baka
>download Chrome
>import everything from Firefox
>install Session Buddy to complement Firefox's Session Manager
>open up a session of 100 tabs of News Sites, Novel WordPress and Blog sites as i do in Firefox without a hitch
>Chrome stalls
>Computer freezes for 15 minutes
>have to restart computer
>turns out Chrome doesn't have lazy loading
>try finding an addon
>install addon
>repeat process
>same result
>Chrome is an unusable piece of shit that doesn't have stability support for Session Managers
Gee thanks OP, for the shittiest browser ever. I really needed this pile of shit.
>>54818227
so apparently typing in the letters ess-em-aych converts to baka
>>54817769
Not very usable, though.
>>54818227
Newfag detected
This isn't just Google viral marketing. I've used Firefox ever since it was Phoenix (0.1). Yes. I fucking used 0.1, there from the goddamn start. That's how much I loved Firefox.
Until recently, when it's become a huge bloated fucking mess of a browser that is slow at absolutely every goddamn thing it tries to do. There is no point using it any more and every fork and other version has either inherited at least part of its bloat or completely sucks because of incompatibility or instability, or both. And every other browser on the planet is garbage.
Use Chrome or Chromium. There is no point using anything else. None. Fucking seriously. This from a long-time Firefox user. Firefox and its kin are dead.
>>54818155
I wrote Chrome is so botnet.. I know that Edge is a botnet too. But Chrome is even a bigger botnet.
Hurensohn.
>>54812403
>>54818277
So Firefox takes a full 3-5 seconds to start up, big deal. You can customize it to however you want it to look which is reason #1 not to switch to ugly chrome.
>>54818336
>So Firefox takes a full 3-5 seconds to start up, big deal.
>shutting firefox down in the first place
only normies and faggots do this
>>54818279
If you care at all about botnets then what are you doing on Windows 10? Using that but complaining about botnets makes no sense unless you're autistic.
>>54818240
Wow thanks for letting us all know, we had no idea. This is a really groundbreaking discovery you've made.
Now go share it with leddit and never come back.
>>54818488
>If you care at all about botnets then what are you doing on Windows 10?
I'm not even using Windows 10. Saying I would rather use Edge was a fucking metaphor.
>>54818518
Whatever you say pajeet.
>>54812403
>Keeps saved passwords, history, everything
you're just plain lying
>>54812936
Google Ultron is what NASA uses
>>54818559
Whatever you say Shlomo.
>>54818655
So you want to make out?
>use chrome, they said
>>54814535
>>54813160
He means on YouTube, because apparently supporting YouTube's DRM = HTML5
>>54812403
No, I use Developer x64 instead. Fuck Botnet Chrome.
>>54812531
Not using superior 8.1 IE11.
No joke, I sometimes use the IE when I only open up one tab.
>>54818961
>he doesn't use windows 10
It's like you want to be a luddite
>>54819535
Hi pajeet
>>54818961
is there any way for windows to close all those together?
>>54819580
Quit chrome?
>>54815737
1. It's not vertical tabs. It's a separate window that has a list.
2. It looks like shit.
3. IT ACTUALLY HAS A PAID MODE TO UNLOCK FEATURES AND MAKES A FUCKING POPUP LAYER TO REMIND USERS
>mfw
Does Chrome
let me have my bookmarks in a drop down tree menu?
have a video grabber that works as well as flashgot?
allow me to re-arrange the interface exactly the way I like?
>>54819535
Nice one, rajesh
>>54815737
This is literal trash. Chrome's architecture won't allow for a not-trash vertical tab extension. Even inside of Chrome's trash-ness it's managed to be trash by including paid features.
>>54812784
i thought thats steam for a second in the first panel
>>54812403
I've been using chrome for a year now but I'll be switching back soon. Reasons are many little things I don't feel like listing right now.
>>54818241
wot. mpv and youtube-dl both just werk. what isn't usable about them?
>>54815368
Me too. That is seriously pathetic.
What's the verdict on IceDragon? Besides the ram issue, is it better or worse compared to the other firefox flavors?
>>54820176
Meh don't bother
I keep trying it but it just feels broken after using it for a bit
Try Vivaldi. Can use chrome extensions on it and it's pretty
>>54819998
yes
maybe?
no
use vivaldi instead for this
Well, I just made the switch from firefox to chrome. I installed vimium but I think I'll still miss Vimperator. I used firefox because I wanted to support a browser that was truly Free (as in freedom) but it just can't compete with chrome any longer.
>inb4 2 rupies have been deposited into your account
>>54818241
How do you mean?
>>54812792
same shit, different taste
>>54812823
moving passwords requires an addon. most addons have to be changed alot to work with palemoon.
>>54812403
>>54820326
There are no chrome extension I'd miss on firefox. I have to compare ff and vivaldi myself.
>>54820520
There are no Chrome extensions not on FF, you mean -- usually, there's even a better alternative on FF sans the botnet shit Chrome promotes.
Vivaldi is ok on for my little MBA I bring to college. I can't se myself using it on my main computer over FF and the vertical tabs doesn't have a tree-style cascade to them, but I'm sure that can be remedied. I just hate installing shit from the Chrome Extensions store.
>>54812403
Nah, I'm happy with Pale Moon.
>>54820702
Benefits over standard FF?
>>54820714
Hipster cred.
>>54820714
No shit like hello or pocket packed in it. Plus, my extensions still work in it properly.
In Mozilla's quest to ruin itself or be more like Chrome, it fucked over a lot of add-ons and the devs abandoned them instead, of constantly trying to fix or rewrite them entirely.
>>54812403
can't import pass no matter what i do
>>54820326
>Vivaldi
>using a fullscreen Chromium web app as a browser
>watching youtube on chrome on html 5 2x speed
>video lags on certain part of the video especially when the video is static / in a loading screen of a game
>tries it on firefox
>smooth as butter
What is wrong with my chrome?
>>54812627
Get a better addon called 'uBlock Origin'
It's more light and allows ABP style filters, its own filter syntax and hosts files.
>>54823033
The Google effect.
Everything Google touches becomes shit.
Take Chromium for example.
You can bet your virgin ass that the Chromium devs are probably very capable of implementing lazy loading into the browser code, but the Google devs doing Chrome announced an implementation that exists in words only and seems to not exist at all in terms of functional existence.
Or take YouTube for example after Google got their hands on it.
A fucking travesty is what it became.
Everything Google touches turns to shit.
I can only imagine the self-driving cars self-driving themselves into the fucking Ocean in a final attempt of upholding natural selection against the idiots who own them.
>>54812403
Done two weeks ago. Saved me 10 sec every time I was trying to open fireshit.
>>54812403
I can't live without muh tree style tabs
>>54823489
>he doesn't have an SSD
>he downgraded browsers instead of upgrading to this decade
>>54812403
>Avid Chrome user since its release
>All other browsers take a lot of time to launch
>Time passes
>Firefox is pretty ugly, but overall seems on par with Chrome
>New Tab page's grid is set specifically to open all tabs I want in order
>Google decides the grid should be "most frequent" instead, removes ability to move squares around
>Make my grid as it used to, pin each one to its place
>Google decides you can no longer pin
>Make sure to keep my squares in place
>Google resets the grid
>Continue passively adjusting my grid, while things just kinda move a bit
>Google decides to push out its "Apps"
>Stupid ass name, "apps" is a word for Apple's products' applications
>Apps get stuck in my New Tab page
>Do my dangest to get rid of them
>Eventually Apps are put to the side of the New Tab page
>Google decides to push Apps some more and puts an immovable button for it in the bookmarks bar
>Switch to Firefox
>Get used to its bad looks
>No regrets
>>54823587
>I'm too retarded to make Firefox not look like shit
Can't say I expected more from a Chromefag
I'm using Pale Moon but when it comes to html5 videos it takes all the bandwidth. It seems to be a problem between Pale Moon and the Asus modem I'm using.
Any idea?
>>54823611
Mind sharing a screenshot of a "not look like shit" Firefox so I know what to aim for? I'm quite alright with vanilla FF's current looks.
My main issue back then was moving the tabs around, how easy and visually appealing it is to pull a tab out and make a new window, and how good it looks pulling a tab from one window to the other. Firefox made some advancements in that regard, though it's still not perfect.
>>54812403
Dear Google,
Stick a flaming log up your ass, sideways, and spin, Mother fucker.
>>54812403
>Nothing of value was lost
except for having a ugly as fuck browser that i can't modify to my liking
but that doesn't matter since your post is obviously a b8
how the fuck did this thread get 188 replies again?
>>54812403
Dear anon,
I use Chrome, Firefox and IE. Why? Because i work doing QA.
>>54814454
I really doubt it. pentadactyl isn't just a few keyboard shortcuts, it's a whole overlay for the browser.
But you can still give its name and I'll look into it.
>>54823689
Can't help you there, I don't use Firefox.
>>54812403
The only reason I completely switched to chrome was because firefox kept acting like a real bitch and would constantly stall on youtube videos. I was tired of all the error messages. Switched and everything has been okay.
>>54820326
Doesn't Vivaldi build its UI around JavaScript and ReactJS? I tried using it, and it had that classic, kinda-slow UI experience out of other ReactJS apps.
Sometimes it stutters, but usually there's only a split-second delay when doing certain things, but it's enough to drive me crazy. Fuck JS/ReactJS for desktop application UIs.
>>54812732
Chromium and disable all the stuff in the settings and youre golden
>>54824821
>Doesn't Vivaldi build its UI around JavaScript and ReactJS?
Yeah, it's basically a Chromium web app
>>54812403
I just did the opposite. Oh Firefox, I missed you so much.
>>54823587
Firefox can really look like whatever you want though.
No.
I like iceweasel, and you know, my freedoms being respected.
I will not use software which is created by a company like google. They do not respect my freedoms nor my privacy.
When iceweasel support is dropped i will switch to GNU Icecat. But that's not going to happen until stretch becomes stable i believe.
>>54818234
>>open up a session of 100 tabs of News Sites, Novel WordPress and Blog sites as i do in Firefox without a hitch
not defending Chrome here but why do you need 100 tabs open at once?
VIMPERATOR
IMPERATORV
MPERATORVI
PERATORVIM
ERATORVIMP
RATORVIMPE
ATORVIMPER
TORVIMPERA
ORVIMPERAT
RVIMPERATO
>>54825406
Not him but it's how I browse, deal with it
>>54825437
but why?
>>54812717
Google Chrome then lmao
>>54812403
>download chrome
ok
>import everything from firefox
not possible
>uninstall firefox
no
>nothing of value was lost
except the ability to browse the internet
>>54812415
How do I get this in FF?
>>54825790
Why not? Any browsing on Gelbooru for me quickly turns into a hundred tab adventure.
>>54826279
Piro's Tree Style Tabs can be found in Mozilla's addons store.
LMAO GOOGLE CHROME LOOKS SO GOOD
>>54826330
Wow, this shit is completely useless.
Fucking autists, I swear.
>>54826368
I am not sure if it's joke or something, but it's definitely not Firefox as I remember it.
>chrome
>try to browse right now for half an hour
>got 6GB of ram
>nothing open but chrome
>no video running
>this pop's up
A Y L M A O
Y
L
M
A
O
>>54823516
10 sec on SSD
>>54825790
Bookmarking everything would lead to 1000s of bookmarks that are useless clutter, leaving the tabs open and just boomarking what I know will need for future reference keeps them nice and tidy.
>>54826595
I find that very hard to believe. My system's bottlenecked by SATA II and it still only takes two seconds.
>>54826584
>6GB of RAM
Why don't you have 64GB, you aren't poor are you?
>>54826584
>pop's
>>54826584
why don't you have virtual memory running?
you only turn it off when you have more than 8 gigs
>>54812403
>destroys your battery life
no thanks
>>54815776
What is uMatrix
>>54817957
>UBlock Origin
How?
>>54826584
Ivan why are you so poor?
>>54829403
try manually installing it from github
>>54826584
>32 bit
jej
>>54812403
Please, insert the chromebot deep on your ass
>>54827363
He's probably got an SSD. Eliminating needless extra writes is a good thing.
>>54812403
I agree, now that servo is becoming a thing Firefox will destroy Chrome and Edge. Can't wait!
no opera users here? it's the best lads
>>54831054
Opera 12.16 user reporting in, although you were probably talking about that shitty Chropera thing.
>>54831080
what's so good about 12.16?
>>54831332
It's the last version before they gutted it and turned it into a featureless Chrome clone
>keep saved passwords
so any program can access firefox's encrypted (I suppose) password database?
>>54831425
>suggesting Chrome over anything
>especially Opera
Disgusting.
>>54831080
>>54831411
I use '''''''''''chopera''''''''''' and it's fine
>>54831447
It's a massive pile of shit compared to Opera though.
>>54826584
close your fucking tabs heathen,
that's what the history or bookmarks are for, y'know.
>>54831489
Quit dictating how others use their machines. He shouldn't need to conform to what works for the fucking program, it should be the other way around.
>>54831470
is it fast? what's your ram usage?
>>54813188
>Give a version of chrome without botnet
>Runs Windows 10
>>54812403
>is it fast?
It's a browser, speed is a bullshit meme.
>RAM usage
426MB with 12 tabs open
>>54829403
The box is greyed out, but you should still be able to click it.
>>54831569
>>54831586
im getting roughly 45mb per tab and one big 120mb for the browser being open
>>54831706
So my browser uses far less RAM while having more features than yours could ever dream of.
>>54831736
i don't see how it has more
>>54831747
Opera's got
>side tabs
>mail client
>RSS reader
>Opera Turbo
>torrent client
>tab stacks
>integrated userJS support
>integrated ad blocker
>mouse gestures
And that's just scratching the surface.
>>54831773
chopera has some of these as well as everything on the opera and chrome extensions store
>>54831818
>some of those features
A few.
>everything available as extensions
Not even close you fucking retard. Besides, this is all with a stock install, that's the beauty of Opera. It's not a featureless pile of shit, unlike your browser.
>>54831836
link me to all the features then, i still dont see much difference in the vanilla
>>54831867
The fact that you'd even attempt to compare Chropera to Opera is just asinine. Enjoy your inferior trash you shitstain. I'm going to bed.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=list+of+opera+12+features
>>54831893
thx f.a.m
>>54825406
Because everything is open in order and when i open articles they are opened next to the source tab.
When i close the session, the tabs i don't want forgotten are memorized next to the tab i opened them from and next time i open the session everything is as it was before i closed the browser.
Why does your mother's pussy stink of fish?
Because it does.
Why do i browse like this?
Because i do.
>>54812403
does firefox still have the issue where if you load a fuck ton of tabs its eats ram like a motherfucker and close the tabs it gives none of the ram back?
#UninstallFirefox
>>54832680
Check your privileges, inclusiveness is more important than actual skills.
