Only people with Intel i7 CPUs may post itt.
>reppin the 3770k at 4.8ghz
4770k stock clock speed, I for it for the prospects of streaming video games and flexing e-peen. Ended up not using it for either
>>54782177
Still better than the amd poorfags.
>>54782156
>3770k at 4.0ghz reporting in
4.5ghz proof out to be too unstable for me when
>le gayming
Apple a9x master here
>>54782203
I like how our cpu's got released in 2012 but still kicks ass with overclocking.
6700HQ @2.60GHz here.
>>54782219
thank god I didn't buy 4770k back in the day
Kill yourself
ITT buyers remorse
>>54782156
>3770k at 4.8ghz
>4.8ghz
is your chip magical or did you delid or something?
>>54782236
>mfw paid $100 more for just a small increase in performance power
>>54782156
4790k @ 5.0 on 1.35V using a H80i cooler.
max temp 84C
>>54782242
Delid and using noctua nh-d14 with 2 140mm fans.
>>54782251
you actually have less performance than i5 due to your higher temperature and therefore occasional throttling
>>54782236
Im actually quite fond of it, has speed up my videoencoding alot.
And it's a fast cpu.
>>54782156
i7-2600
![19-115-072-02[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/zYNMIqQ.jpg "19-115-072-02[1].jpg")
2500k @ 4.5ghz since launch
suck my dicckkkkkkk
Which one, /g/?
>yfw i7's dont OC as well as i5's unless you disable HT
Xeon Master Race
>>54782287
You fucking retard shit
mfw bought two i5 haswells back when they were first released
mfw CPU performance hasnt really improved since then.
feels alright i guess
>>54782330
Wew lad, no need to be so mad
i7-2630QM here, works fine, just redid the thermal paste and dropped full load temps like 12C over what the stock "pad" was doing.
i7 920 and i7 3632QM
Feels good to be part of the master race :^)
6700k at 4.5 here.
Slapped an NH-D15 on it.
Pretty damn great bit of kit.
> 2700k @ 4,2 Ghz :^)
4790k and 1231v3 reporting in.
4770k at stock with a Silverstone nt06-pro
Should I OC?
corelets pls go
>>54782156
I have an i7 for rendering and multi-tasking.
but it's painful since most programs suck at multi-threading. My i7 is at 1% and it still locks at my pace because adobe has sloppy code.
i3 6320 4.5ghz (oc'd using asrock mobo while it worked)
>>54782156
I7 870 @ 4.17ghz here.
Pretty sure it's faster than an i5 4460 so I have no reason to upgrade for a while still.
5930k at 4.4ghz
>>54782493
hows it performing anon-kun?
oh shit, it forgot my 4.6 overclock when I flashed the bios
>>54782463
nice ancient cpu
>>54782156
cpu cores?
someone get grandpa to a retirement home. no one actually programs those cores anymore.
>>54782156
Suck my dick pleb
>>54782610
>gaymer cpu for gaymer such as myself
congrats dude ;)
>>54782483
vegas bro
i3-4160 here. I'm not CPU limited on anything, including games and VMs. Even did some video editing and it worked fine. I'll upgrade when I find a reason to.
What do you all use your 4c8t i7s for?
>>54782235
You're either number one, or you're nothing, kid.
> Not owning an i7 5960x.
> 4.4 GHZ
Poorfags kek
>>54782679
play a videogame from 1999, browse 4chan and watch youtube/twitch.
>>54782156
i7 6700k at 4GHz reporting in
>AMD IS PURE SHIT
>GNU/Linux is too
>>54782693
I only have a 5930k, I feel worthless.
>>54782556
I keep thinking about replacing it but nothing is really worth the money yet. Broadwell-E looks interesting but the Blue Jew wants a lot of money for the 8 and 10 core versions. Probably better to build a Skymeme 6700K rig for vidya and keep this one as a build server
>>54782679
Less waiting at compile time
>>54782693
not bad senpai
4770K in my desktop and a 640M in my laptop. Am I cool now?
Intel 3970x core i7 here bitches over clocked to 4.7ghz with liquid cooling.
>>54782788
>2500k @ 5.2ghz with air cooling
>120GFLOS in Lynx
>Costed 1000$ 5 years ago
How do you feel?
>>54782318
i7 is butter.
>>54782679
>i3-4160 here. I'm not CPU limited on anything
that's because you are a weak internet user
I use an i5 at work, and I can definitely tell it throttles compared to my i7.
>>54782156
I7-3520M reporting in, works like a charm.
i7 3770K & 4790.
Tip top. Bought an i5 for a silly build to see if the memes where true.
And yes.
>>54782356
2670QM here. Got my laptop @2011, recently took it apart to clean it, there was some dust but nothing more. Thermal paste was still a liquid :D
>>54782860
the memes that i7 is not worth the cash?
>>54782724
not worth upgrading, wait and see what comes after skylake, an oc'd 3770k will last untill that.
>>54782679
Using svp to interpolate my animu to 144fps.
games, video rendering and streaming.
>>54782870
The more threads for me the better.
>>54782968
thats a non-meme
>>54782986
I7-6700k on 4.6Ghz with vcore=1.328V
reminder that i7s are a marketing meme
>>54783137
91.4% multithreaded performance vs stock 5930k. 42% higher single threaded performance with a 20% higher core.
The fact is, if you are using newer than SB non-E Intel chip, you are fucking idiot.
Sure, SB-E, Ivy-E and Haswell-E are okay, if price is no concern.
Who 4790k here?
Virtualization is actually tolerable
Hell it has VT-d with it even for a k-processor
>>54782156
5820k @ 3.7GHz
>>54783212
dont post you poor shit here
suck my massive cock faggots
>>54782156
> 3770k
I have the same badass CPU ^^
>>54783149
I understand you can't get one.
>>54783221
The new CPUID benchmark version (15.01.64) is incomparable for comparison with your version.
(my 5820k scores ~10600 multicore and ~1650 single core)
>>54782251
Go sandy or go home tbqh desu familia
>>54783246
Nice micro-penis.
>>54782156
i7 930 reporting in
>inb4 bclk overclock is unstable
runs fine, never bsod or restart ever.
>>54782156
Waiting for either Skylake-E or maybe even Zen to upgrade. So I'm over a year or two out our so.
Upgrading my GPU within the next couple of months though. The CPU is also overclocked to 4.2, but Speccy doesn't show the overclocks unless you go under the CPU tab.
>>54783303
nice nano-penis.
>>54782156
Hi.
What did I win?
>>54783424
besides our sympathies that you're on a mobile chip?
>>54782177
>4770k stock clock speed, I for it for the prospects of streaming video games and flexing e-peen. Ended up not using it for either
me too
actually, i steam sometimes but the stock speeds handle it fine
>>54783424
Hi friend!
>>54782847
>>54783449
ANIME IS NOT REAL
Only people with freedom-hating, privacy-invading, backdoored CPUs post itt
>>54783212
>1GB RAM
>>54783485
we have nothing to hide: the meme
>>54783485
More like people who don't give a shit about neckbeard linux virgin conspiracy theories.
KYS
>>54783448
If you're using quicksync encoding on the streaming you probably aren't even using more than 10-15% CPU on it. Of course then you are stuck with Quicksync quality which leaves much to be desired, but it is quick as hell and cheap on CPU time.
My i7 2600k literally thinks its a dual core CPU.
I can not enable the 3rd or 4th cores in the bios, its like they dont exist. It happened one day after a series of constant bsods.
>>54783538
It's the chipset fault.
Boot to linux and see if the problem persists. Also reflash BIOS with the newest version available.
>>54783538
well the dual cores ARE just damaged quad cores that have had the extra cache and shit disabled.
>all these retards itt
:^)
>>54783594
Nice housefire, poorfag.
6700 reporting in
>>54782156
4790K @ 4.7 here, quite happy with it so far. Maybe Zen will be so absolutely amazing to convince me to upgrade, but I doubt it.
>>54783306
BCLK OC was how it was done in those days. I had an i5 750 at 4GHz for years, IIRC the "regular" 1st gen i5s and i7s didn't even have an unlocked multiplier, so it was all BCLK OC. That was a wonderful CPU though, absolutely loved it. It's still serving well (at stock) to this day, though only doing office duty.
>>54783594
>Max TDP 94
With that OC i'm sure you're past that :^)
>>54783631
there was i7-870k with unlocked multipler, familia.
>>54783650
>803.9 mhz
>>54783646
Yeah I know, but weren't those top-end chips, basically occupying the market space that the newer "enthusiast" lines from Intel occupy now?
I remember buying my i5 750 at around the same price or slightly cheaper than new unlocked i5s and the price point equivalent of a 4790K/6700K was the i7 920, which was locked too. Anyway, maybe I just don't remember right since it was a while ago and I never touched an unlocked 1st gen i5/i7.
>>54783686
>AMD fags STILL don't know about idle clocks
laughingwhores.png.jpg.exe
>>54782156
I got dat i7
i7 3770 @ 3.40GHz
I have no idea why I didn't just get an i5.
Reporting in.
Built 12/2015
4770k at 4.4 on stock voltage
>>54783790
>LGBT-tier cooling
do you have sex with men, women, or both?
>>54782156
Posting just because thread is dumb. Pentium, Athlon 64 and Richland here.
>>54783792
Got a CPU-z for that?
Not that I don't believe you, but the last person who said they had their CPU running at stock voltages really just had it so their motherboard was set to auto voltage and since they didn't change it, it must be stock voltage.
i7 860
lol
>>54783295
No it's not. If it were the difference would have been huge. What the heck are you talking about. Just download the new version and post results you cuck.
2600k @ 5ghz on custom water cooling loop.
To all i7 owners: Thanks for keeping the sensible i5 affordable!
>>54783806
Yeah I know.
That's a mistake by me and I'm regretting it. I lived upon the brand name but already had to RMA it because noisy fan.
On top of that, the replacement is beginning to have THE SAME ISSUE.
That serves me good. They warned me, i did not listen.
>>54783923
Are you retarded? Your score for multicore is 4,000. Mine is 10,600. Obviously they've changed how it scores. This was downloaded yesterday, so unless you've updated in the last 24 hours, this is the latest CPU-z
>>54783829
CPUZ doesn't report vcore properly (0.6 instead of the 1.2 stock dunno why aida report 1.267 it's set to 1.2 in the bios )
>>54783257
>femanon
rule 30 and 31
5820k @ 4ghz reporting in.
>>54783948
your fault for being poor and can't have 8 threads.
>>54782287
Oh man these high temps. All that throttling.
>>54783975
4770 was known to have some weird stock voltages, some under 1.2v, some over 1.3v.
>>54784078
I got one of the 1.2, pretty good batch to be honest.
>>54784092
Yea I saw a guy once have like 1.34 stock voltage, he ended up returning it because there was literally no OC headroom. Next one he had was 1.22v, so it's just luck of the draw sometimes.
3770k @ 4.4 with aircooling and no voltage change.
>>54784018
>buys meme7
>throws aways more money
>claims to be richer than someone who didn't
>says "can't have 8 threads"
>doesn't understand how HT actually works
>can't use all meme7 cores himself
>>54783985
>he doesn't name his computer after women
anon, that's standard practice since the dawn of modern computing.
>>54783985
https://www.4chan.org/rules
They only go up to 17 o.O
>>54784303
It was set automatically according to my name.
>not having a 4790K
literal memes itt
6700K reporting in.
runs my vm workstation/ESXi/Sophos FW
>>54783985 (You)
>https://www.4chan.org/rules
>They only go up to 17 o.O
>not knowing the rules of internet
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
NORMIE GTFOOOO
>>54784435
>rule 30: What has been seen cannot be unseen.
>rule 31: Tits or GTFO
>>54784501
>rule 30: What has been seen cannot be unseen.
retard
>rule 30: There are no girls on the internet
>>54784521
>rule 31: There are no girls on the internet
>implying that isn't what I said
skymeme
It just werks!
>>54783306
>i7 920 in my pc
>i7 960 in the pc I built for my mom's son
Feels good desu
>>54783461
Pretty comfy.
Did you tune TurboBoost mode in XTU?
What's the difference between the first gen quad-core i7s on the LGA 1156 and 1366 socket?
>>54784978
The chipset, main differences being 1366 uses QPI instead of DMI bus, and 1366 had triple channel memory vs 1156 using normal dual channel.
Also 1156 supported PCIe passthrough(VT-d) whereas 1366 didn't.
>>54785043
I meant performance-wise, which is better?
I can pick the LGA 1156 duo up for $200 and the LGA 1366 duo for $50 more
>>54784499
embarrassing
>>54785066
Meh, both are old enough I wouldn't drop those kinds of $ anyway.
I mean $250 is getting to mid range skylake i5 territory.
>>54785132
Should I ask the guy selling them to knock the price down another $50? They're old, but they've hardly been used.
>>54785132
And that's including the motherboard and cooler.
>>54785165
If you have a microcenter nearby you can get an i5-4690k for $245 with a motherboard
I just cant see the value in dropping that kind of money on something 6+ years old.
6700K at 4.6GHz and 1.312V reporting in. Never seen it go above 70 in stress tests with a Noctua NH-U14S.
Had a i7 950, got it to 4.3, went back to 4.1 for voltage reasons though. Now I have a 6700k that just won't go above 4.7 even with severe ov. How cucked am I?
>>54785186
>I just cant see the value in dropping that kind of money on something 6+ years old.
welcome to the CPU market, a market so stagnant that a fucking 2600k matches a current CPU
>>54785357
Sure, but paying $200, or even $150 for a 7 year old socket/CPU is retarded.
Especially with how cheap the 4xxx series can be had for.
>>54784501
Never heared of them. Also, This is a sfw board (;
>>54782156
Sitting on my i5 Hassy typing this.
I have a 4790S and a 2700K as well but this is the one I'm gaming on.
>>54785896
>implying you dont have a cock anyway
keep trying
>>54782558
transistor number is going down with every picture I see.
980 Ti, Check
4790k, Check
200 dollar mobo, check
400 dollar ssd, check
letting it sit unused because there are no good AAA games, Priceless
>>54786003
I honestly don't understand people like you. If you don't play video games, or at least not those with high requirements, why the fuck do you even buy all that shit?
>>54785968
Yeah, my boyfriend's (;
>>54786042
I used to play games
then i got a good job
then I bought good hardware
but while also having a good job, i got more money to be social too, so i became social
i have friends, i have a girlfriend, a nice car
I "Grew" up.
Now all that powerful hardware just sits, not even powered on, I use my cheapass laptop more than anything else.
I used to keep buying AAA games too, and then not play them. "I'll get some time to play it this weekend."
"OKay next weekend"
"Maybe tonight after work"
"Fucking never"
I bought FO4 the day it came out. I have 24 hours put into it.
RIP
This will be the last gaming PC I ever buy.
>>54786089
How sad. Do you at least have another hobby that brings you joy?
>>54782279
Would you recommend delidding? I want to do it to my 4770K since it runs really hot, but I don't know if the performance gains are worth it, and if it will remain stable.
>>54786117
Hanging out with friends, telling goofy ass jokes and watching them laugh their goddamn heads off at it, repairing laptops, creative writing. Being a general tech adviser to my friends, family and co-workers.
I still have plenty of joy in my life, It's just a lesson learned. Spent YEARS wanting the best hardware (within reason) you could get for gaming. Muh 144fps, 1440p monitor ULTRA settings, blah blah ... Now I don't even use it.
The only game I am even remotely looking forward to now isn't even on PC. So that's even funnier.
>>54786171
Sell it at a loss and buy a cheap devils canyon. Delidding is a meme and doesn't always work and significantly reduces the amount you can get for your CPU.
Sell it for like 250, invest another 50 and buy a 4790k.
>>54782185
shill spotted
>>54782847
All day.
>>54783969
What's the overclock on that thing and what cooling?
>>54786069
for now ;)
>>54783246
Glorious
>>54783212
dat clock speed is smokin'
>>54783594
amd pls go
>>54783771
Is it not enough we allow amd to post, but we dont allow faggots.
>>54786490
H110 and very minimal overclock
>>54783444
>>54782156
just bought a 6700k today, downloading wangbl03z atm
>>54782156
Who here /undervolt/
My computer crashes about once a week but it's worth it for dem cold numbers.
>>54782156
i5 2500k master race reporting for duty
>>54786521
>2 hard drives
>2 cd roms
>discrete sound card
wtf are you even doing, nigger?
>>54783969
So my 6700k is within 8% of your multithreaded performance while being about 40% faster in single threaded processing? Good deal.
>>54782177
4790K bought for the same reasons with the same results.
Then I got into ML and thought "oh now I can really make use of this thing" but learned that I need CUDA cores to get anything done.
>tfw last cpu I will ever need
>tfw if I had any sense I would have invested in a decent gpu instead
>>54787038
Well i'm sure you're OCing far more than I am. The 5820k easily goes up to 4.5GHz, I have mine at 3.7GHz, a full 800MHz lower than I could easily have it, and playing with voltages I can get it stable up at 4.7GHz. Once that's done I'll be within 10-15% single core and much higher multithreaded.
i7 920 at 3.8ghz on air has been my main since 2008 or 2009 I think and hasn't let me down on a single game or application amazingly. I recently was gifted a 5960X so that will be the crux of my new 8 physical core overclocked behemoth
>>54787060
I'm running a comfortable 4.6Ghz (1.328v, 21c, 212x). I can probably push it up to 4.7~4.8ghz for benchmarking purposes (p sure it would trounce your 5820k then).
It's not that easy for a 5820k to go that high. 4.6ghz is very standard 6600/700k territory. It's 4.8ghz+ that becomes difficult, but then again I really doubt your run-of-the-mill 5820k can do that.
> I'll be within 10-15% single core and much higher multithreaded.
lol nah
It scores 2115 on stock for the single thread benchmark. You're 1600 with a mild OC.
>>54785991
Just like the die size.
Is OC'ing actually even worth it for everyday use like video games and browsing?
AMD A12 Godavari Master race @ 4.5 GHz
>>54787178
No.
>>54782156
i7 4970K reporting in
also, Pajeet, $5 has been transferred to your account.
I went from an i7-4770K to Dual Hex Core X5675 Xeons to an i5-4670K.
Needless to say, I miss the hyperthreading.
>>54782156
3770K masterrace
4.4 @1.275V now
Won't go higher unless I do 1.4V
yes
>>54782156
i7 620m reporting in
>>54787211
Thought so.
It's basically just e-peen then.
>>54782156
Have an i7 4790k but don't know how to overclock it LMAO
>>54787143
I can match your stock single core performance with 4.3-4.4Ghz, beat it with 4.5Ghz+ and multithreaded will still beat the 6700k without OCing the 5820k, but once it's OC'd the multi-threaded blows the 6700k out.
6700k SHOULD have more single threaded performance but intel are jews, the fact I can match or even beat yours at all in single performance is kinda telling.
i7 4770s master race reporting.
Why are you using extra TDP just to be able to "overclock" when computers are good enough now?
I would overclock it more but my fan it's shit and my room is warm
![06e1d9f02a[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/t7gTSXK.png "06e1d9f02a[1].png")
r8 pls
it'll make me happy
ITT goyim cucks who didn't research the Xeon product line before spending money on subpar binning, unnecessarily high TDP, and an iGPU they never utilize.
>>54787704
But my i7 doesn't have an iGPU senpai.
>>54782287
This is why you don't have an i7.
Stupid people stay poor.
>>54782177
4770K as well, but mine's at 4.4ghz
Use it for photoshop, gaymen and other thinks. Also run Boinc when I'm not using it
>>54786875
You don't belong here and your CPU isn't that special.
>>54787568
The fact that a stock 6700k is within 15% of a mildly overclocked 5820k with 50% more cores says a lot more. A 20% OC to match stock speeds? The optimistic OC of a 5820k is 4.5ghz. I advise you to not try going there (or any higher) in any case since the ~350W housefire you'd be prepping is probably not safe for either your mobo or your home.
>OC'd the multi-threaded blows the 6700k out.
Eh 20% at the very most on stock. Most likely less than 15% once you plateau on the OC.
5820k was a better buy when the 6700k cost $400+. Fact of the matter is that the 6700k has has higher IPC/base frequency, more OC headroom, comes close to the multithreaded performance of a 6 core 5820k and beats it in single threading (and probably multithreading up to 4 cores (possibly 8 threads), runs cooler and is more efficient. The igpu is a bonus too. The 5820k is a weird compromise between professional and consumer (like gaming) needs and fully satisfies neither. Not that there are proper alternatives that fit the bill yet anyway.
>>54787932
>The optimistic OC of a 5820k is 4.5ghz
Nigger shut up, that was stable enough to get CPU-Z validated and under 1.3v meaning I can safely (according to intel anyway) apply even more voltage and potentially hit 4.8-4.9ghz. However at that 4.7GHz my cooling is keeping me around 73c so I am not going to take it further.
Also, it shouldnt be a shocker that a 14nm part vs a 22nm part has higher single core performance.
>>54787932
>Most likely less than 15% once you plateau on the OC.
Mutlicore is pretty easy to test if you have Cinebench R11.5
Basically shows what ideal scaling would result in. So it's a best case scenario benchmark.
Would love to see what your 6700k gets.
>>54788104
Helps if I include the right benchmark.
>>54782156
Xeon E3-1241 v3.
>>54782235
>obsolete 4th gen
>running filthy ddr3
Disgusting, do yourself a favor and upgrade to a Broadwell-E
>>54784074
>posts a picture of i7 with no load
>oh boy look at these high temps
>>54782809
I dont need to over clock that much even tho the extreme editions were rated to be over clocked all the way to 5.5 if you were a pro.
>>54782326
reporting
>>54786412
This ain't i7-3520m. i7-3520m is clocked at 2.90GHz
>>54788843
I have that same CPU, at stock clocks and voltages I can barely get it over 50c at load.
At 4.5GHz I hit ~65C under load.
At 4.7GHz I hit ~72C under load.
>consumer i7s everywhere
>>54787273
>>54786875
>>54782357
>>54782326
>>54787593
>nehalam
>sandy vag
>ivy vag
>haslel
>masterrace
Filthy DDR3 vermin detected
>>54788878
That's pretty good, I take it you have a noctua cooler?
>>54788892
>implying i7's aren't all consumer CPUs
Have a 2600k from a gaymeme pc I bought a a few years ago (I spilled water all over it kek) still havent built anything with it. What do /g/?
>>54788941
Cum on it and post pics
>>54788941
Out of thermal paste? Just use semen.
my work provided idle machine, i do all of my computing on a desktop with a fx-8320 in it
>>54788926
H110i GTX with Noctua fans.
why does game-debate say upgrading from a phenom II to a haswell is 'not a worthwhile upgrade' when it's ridiculously faster?
>>54789128
>H110i
That explains the low temps then, that thing can keep my bro's OC'd FX-8350 under 70C. He's a huge fan of corsair, so naturally he got a H110i.
Pretty impressive considering it's a closed loop.
>>54789164
Yeah stock fans are loud as dicks though, the noctuas have the same performance and are 10dBa quieter.
All my computer use i7 at this point. It's not even because I have a use that only an i7 can preform. It's not because I've looked into it.
My first new desktop computer ever was a Ivy Bridge i7. Since then, I just can't stomach the idea of buying a computer that doesn't at least vaguely match that performance and with the same number.
Even if it doesn't make sense, if I see the i5 my brain just feels like I'm downgrading and I don't like that. My laptop is an i7HQ something, which thankfully manages to have 4 cores, and that's it.
I'm just stuck on i7 forever now. If I could go back in time, I would have made my first desktop have an i5. I have this same issue with RAM. My desktop had 12GB, and even though I never hit close to the limit on that, my laptop has 16GB because I can't ever let myself feel like I'm not upgrading and progressing.
When I get around to building my desktop next year, this means I know damn well I'll be buying 32GB of RAM for no goddamn good reason. But I can't help myself. No one can.
I don't even have friends to try and brag about computers specs. It's just me and no one cares. So why do I care? I don't know.
Help.
>>54789026
>>54789108
Thanks friends
Should I get a 6600k or 6700k for playing games?
>>54789244
autism
Any 5960X owners ITT? If so how well do they overclock? Would I be able to tame a 5960X running at 4.5ghz under 100% load with an air cooler?
I've done custom liquid in the past and I can't be bothered. Too much of a hassle for me. I'm currently sitting on an i5-4690k and while capable, I need moar coars for encoding. Would a 6700k suffice? Can handbrake even take advantage of 16 threads?
>>54789244
It's Intel's hebrew mind tricks making your purchase decisions for you. You have to break free.
Also 32GB of RAM is only like $100 nowadays so why not? I'm going to get 64GB soon.
>>54789265
For vidya, a 6600k would be better, put the money towards a GPU and a bigger SSD
I have a maxed out ThinkPad w530 being shipped to me, can I participate?
6700K in the mail :(
>Ancient "gaming" laptop
>i7 Q 720
Does this even qualify? There's more powerful phones around nowadays.
>>54789380
Good goyim. Let the Hebrew flow through you.
>>54789398
Are you autismo?
>>54789350
I usually convert and had a 3570K before. I thought it would be enough. But ME3MP shuttered when I played it while converting a BluRay in the background. So I bought the i7, now I can do both at the same time.
My laptops always had i7s, but on laptop you have to get the i7 because 4 cores.
>>54789316
4.5GHz is possible but you'd be on the higher end of the silicon lottery and i'm unsure if you could do it on air, but probably.
Most are ~4.2GHz on air.
>>54789406
got it from IREP for $134USD
who the jew now
>>54789455
>i7-6700k for the price of i3-6200
For some reason, I don't believe you.
>>54782156
I wanted to be a rebel and post here because I have a FX cpu in my computer, then I realized that I'm at work and here I use an i7...
fuck this
feels good. GTX 970 becoming pleb tier though, might need to upgrade.
>>54789420
>Everyone should get an i7 because everyone converts a Blu-ray while playing games.
I honestly don't think you represent the average population of video gamers. A better GPU and bigger SSD would be a much better investment for an average gamer.
>>54789518
i7 with 970 REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>54789482
just google intel retail edge summer deal or winter deal
they do it twice a year
>>54789526
I don't only game. I also record ingame. If you ever want to do that then you should get an i7 for sure.
And yes, I would prefer a bigger GPU and CPU overclock to i7 power. CPU is usually the smallest bottleneck in games.
>>54789398
>There's more powerful phones around nowadays
fucking retard
>>54782156
FX-8350 reporting in. i7-3770 fags mad jealous of my eight corz nd out of the box clox
>>54790156
>Jealous of being a poorfag
>>54782156
4790k reporting
I pity Xeonless peasants.
>>54790156
>FX-8350 reporting in. i7-3770 fags mad jealous
i3 2120 here
kill me
i7-4770HQ here! rMBP 2015, great CPU, great iGPU does everything I need it to while being relatively portable.
5820k 4.2 clocked for streaming, rendering, multi desktop applications such as photoshop capture software recording software and games.
>>54790532
inshallah i will join the xeon club soon
if fuckers can't get me the z9pe motherboard i'll just build a more modern 2011v3 system
long compile times pls go and stay go
AMD gonna make all your i7s obsolete soon
