Best rendering GPU under $1000?

File: 1418160512510.png (337KB, 1064x698px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

337KB, 1064x698px

>>54760671

File: 1457207932818.jpg (169KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

169KB, 900x900px

>>54760677

>Gaymer food
Why is /v/ so pathetic?

File: oldasfuck.png (67KB, 672x595px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

67KB, 672x595px

>>54760671
Quad SLI gtx 590s

>GTX
>rendering
No.

I thought AMD was better for rendering.

>>54760871
>rendering without CUDA
Don't act dumb.

>>54760864
Why not? It has to be Nvidia because many rendering programs are CUDA only. Quadros are overpriced as fuck and don't get better performance for rendering. GTX is the obvious choice.

>>54760671
>GPU rendering
it's like you don't even care about quality
>>54760916
cuda is literally the worst

>>54760844
Don't knock it till you try it desu
It's just nuts

>>54760991
>it's like you don't even care about quality
Don't be retarded. There's no difference between CPU and GPU with a proper renderer.

>cuda is literally the worst
Agreed. OpenCL is far better. But CUDA is used all over the place.

File: hulk-hogan-wwe.jpg (369KB, 2197x1463px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

369KB, 2197x1463px

>>54760918
Fermis render best
everything is optimized for them blender runs dank on my quad sli setup

>>54761012
>Don't be retarded. There's no difference between CPU and GPU with a proper renderer.

any good video renderer that uses opencl to render video? cant get anything to render faster and it seems to default to cpu, on everything, i have a 280X.