When it comes to monitors, what would you say is the slowest

Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-05-25 13:09:19 Post No. 54735761
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 385.jpg (37 KB, 250x250) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 13:09:19 Post No. 54735761 [Report]

When it comes to monitors, what would you say is the slowest "acceptable" response time. Especially for gaming.
Some of my friends have been saying that anything slower than 5ms is useless, others said that 12ms is still perfectly fine. What do you think?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 13:12:47 Post No.54735801
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 13:12:47 Post No.54735801 [Report]

>>54735761
Well, if you play fps games like csgo, bf4, whatever, 12ms is a lot of time that can lead you to win o lose. If you work, i mean, programming, photo editing, video editing... it's not very importsn the response time.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 13:20:23 Post No.54735898
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 13:20:23 Post No.54735898 [Report]

is response time related to Hz?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 13:47:27 Post No.54736196
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 13:47:27 Post No.54736196 [Report]

>>54735898
No.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 14:14:02 Post No.54736500
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 14:14:02 Post No.54736500 [Report]

When it comes to monitors, I'd educate myself and realize that I shouldn't give a shit about manufacturer-listed response times and realize they mean nothing.

If you want to know about the response time and input lag of a monitor, go to tftcentral or similar monitor review sites.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 15:07:36 Post No.54737096
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 15:07:36 Post No.54737096 [Report]

>>54736500
This. The specs are often bullshit. You need reviews that actually take high speed photographs of motion and such.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-25 15:25:14 Post No.54737266
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-25 15:25:14 Post No.54737266 [Report]

>Response time over 0ms
Trinitrons do not have this problem.