>>54660841
vim

>>54660844
Is this a serious recommendation or are you just memeing? I'm willing to consider it, but I don't want to learn a billion keybindings, I'd rather just be able to type and go.

nano, idiot

>>54660865
Not him:
I use vi instead of vim, and you can learn vi in a single day, two days, or a week, if you want.
vi only takes as long to learn as you want it to.

>>54660865
>>54661098
vi doesn't have color though.
xedit, however, does.

>>54661098
Just use vim. Vim isn't hard and you can learn the basics that you need to start editing in minutes.

>>54661131
I already know how to use vi though, I was telling him how fast it is to learn.
I'm already quick and effective with the text editor, and don't feel a need to install the vim package.

ed man! !man ed

>>54660865

Learning vim takes like 10 minutes, then it's about as good as any regular text editor. Mastering it takes considerably longer, but the efficiency gains are well worth the effort.

>use vim
>do everything in insert mode
What binds do I need to learn to use?

>>54660841

'ed' is the standard editor.

>>54661367
http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?vi++NetBSD-current
There's a fast startup section if you want to learn less.