>980Ti: $550
>1080: $699
>difference in performance: insignificant
>still no hardware Async compute
>still shit performance with DX12
rippeperoni nvidioni
Pretty shit. Hopefully the 1080 Ultra/Ti will be better.
I bought a 980 TI like 4 months ago. Do I kill myself?
>>54626761
no,keep it until they release the 4080
>>54626779
But living is so hard nowadays..
>>54626636
>68.6 vs 50.4 = 16% increase
>34.56 vs 29.44 = 17% increase
>30.3 vs 25.5 = 19% increase
>154.64 vs 131.96 = 17% increase
etc.
Around 17% increase straight out the gate isn't bad. 10 bucks a frame in witcher 3 ain't great. But its an enthusiast card, it isn't strictly a frames/dollar kind of choice. If that were the case, you wouldn't be looking at either card.
>>54626805
>17% performance increase for 127.3% of the price
>>54626805
>>54626903
Anyone if a 1070 is worth it over the 980ti?
Ars Technia and Anandtech's benches say that the 1080 is 30-39% faster than the 980ti in both dx12 and non dx12 games. And where are you getting a 980ti for $550? They're 600 at the very least.
>>54626805
>>54626903
The issue isn't how much or how little. It's the that decent 4k performance still isn't reachable.
>>54626965
Polaris 10 is more worth it
>>54626636
Something wrong with your testbed?
> At the risk of being redundant the GTX 1080 is now the fastest single-GPU card on the market, and even at 4K it wins at every single gaming benchmark, typically by a good margin. In practice we’re looking at a 31% performance lead over GTX 980 Ti – the card the GTX 1080 essentially replaces – with a similar 32% lead over AMD’s Radeon R9 Fury X.
>>54626973
yeah, 4K is still a meme, and VR games suck ass
>>54627019
>if nvidia cannot into it, it must be a meme!
Remember goys, async compute is only a meme!
>>54626636
I thought 1080 wasn't $699?
>>54627152
the reference model (renamed to founder's edition) costs 100$ extra.
If you want a 1080 for the MSRP, you have to wait months for 3rd partner cards to come out.
>>54627169
how facetious to say the card is 699 then
fucking retards
>>54627190
the card being benchmarked and reviewed everywhere, is $699.
There is no $599 card as of yet. We'll have to see what the partner cards will end up being (performance and price wise). you might get an underclocked 1080 with a shit cooler for 599 eventually.
>>54627152
there is no $599.99, thats the price for partner cards, meaning the partners are going to tack on an aftermarket cooler and charge you $650.00 at the very least. Stupid goy
>>54627169
I thought reference cards were inferior to products of other brands. Why would this cost more?
>>54627214
Because 3rd party vendors are totally going to make sure their top tier cards are underclocked with shit coolers. Ya know like they usually do.
Fucking retard
>>54627257
not all of them you retard. but the better versions will cost more, some even going above $699
>>54627256
some partner cards will be better than the 699 reference model, but some might be worse.
>>54627256
>I thought reference cards were inferior to products of other brands. Why would this cost more?
They come out first, and have a lead on the market for weeks or months depending on demand and how much difference an OEM applies to their aftermarket design/cooler
Hence calling it "founder's edition", it's literally a tax for early adopters who will not fancy themselves "collectors"
OP IS AMDPOORFAGS, PRETTY MUCH CAN IGNORE THIS TROLL THREAD
GTX 1080, FASTER, COOLER, QUIETER THAN FURYX HOUSEFIRES
>>54627328
>>54627328
>memetastic
>>54626636
You fucking AMDrones are on the same shit everyday. The fucking 1080 can do Async Computing but you have to turn it off for better performance.
>>54627370
>The fucking 1080 can do Async Computing but you have to turn it off for better performance.
>>54627328
>COOLER
Well memed
>>54626965
Of course it is, they'll gimp 980ti drivers soon so it's slower than a 1070.
They did it for keppler.
>>54627428
what do the colors represent? why not include in image?
>>54627428
I thought gimping was a maymay. So I shouldn't update my drivers in the future?
>>54627488
you're fucked if you have nvidia.
>game comes out
>uses new api / feature
>can't run on old driver, instant crash
>update driver, gimped performance
>you're raped either way
>>54627341
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-pascal,4572-11.html
>Practically speaking, very few people will run prolonged stress tests on a regular basis. In other words, this isn’t really going to be a problem.
Your pathetic trolling had failed, try again AMDPOORFAGS
>>54627532
>he doesn't play graphics heavy games for a long time
>he doesn't play games during summer
kekyourself
>>54627547
What is 290X/390X HOUSEFIRES
Runs 95C all the time & burns house down
This runs 15C less even after heavy gaming
Stay MAD, AMDPOORFAG
>>54627602
are you just pretending to be a faggot nvidia fanboy? because that's as bad as an actual nvidia fanboy, since that would make you an amd fanboy, and brand loyalty is literally cuck tier retardation
>>54627617
AMDPOORFAGS break down in tears when present with FACTS that they can't counter
>>54627524
Pretty much this.
AMD is trying to give up a majority of tweeking drivers to the developers. They gave the devs better access to the GPU(Mantle/Vulkan/DX12) so that AMD does not have to tweek drivers every time a new game comes out. Nvidia would never do this; It's how they make sure they are in control of your cards.
A local retailer just dropped the price of their 980ti's by the equivalent of 190$ On special
It's very very tempting.. The cheapest I've ever seen this card in my country.
>>54628091
what is the price now? I can get a new 980Ti for 550 euros here
>>54628091
Same. I'm in the US but the 980ti down at $540 is looking pretty damn tasty.
>>54628106
In in South Africa, and the Rand is ridiculously weak at the moment.. But the card is usually R13000, I can get it new (MSI overclocked variant) for R10000. Even for me to import from Amazon (usually cheapest option) would cost more than that
>>54627428
>gtx970 ahead of the 780 ti
>gtx960 ahead of the 780
IT'S HAPPENING AGAIN
>>54628173
>>54628157
the problem is that when you buy it, and the 1080 and 1070 are out and about, Nvidia will gimp the 980Ti with drivers
The 1080 will be better than my 750ti ftw, so I'm down for even the 1070
>>54628221
I know, I know. The 980 ti of today's days are numbered.
>>54628221
Isn't this just a meme?
>>54628259
see >>54628199
see >>54627428
>>54626761
Why, 980ti can run doom at max settings on 1600p at above 60fps
>>54627085
More like
>still no single GPU solution
Still a meme
>>54628364
You don't have to use the new drivers though
>>54628199
Probably the limiting factor on that game are heavy bad implemented visual effects.
http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=694&card2=687
Explain why the difference in top cards is -/+ 1-3 FPS
>>54628418
yes you do. see: >>54627524
>>54626636
All this AMDone damage control. Hopefully someone competent like Samsung buys off AMD after they go out of business when the GTX 1070 and 1080 comes out.
>>54628446
>>54626994
Polaris is a low end product. Even AMD admitted it. It can't compete with Pascal.
>>54628490
medium end. we'll see come 27th of may
This can't be happening. Why does Nvidia always win?
>>54628554
>no AA
Nvidia won.
>>54627257
>implying the top tier cards ever cost less than the reference
>>54628598
Muh Async
>>54628569
First you complain about bench markers using AA at 4K, then you complain about the lack of.
either way, AMD don't evne has anything to compete agains t the 980Ti let alone the 1080, what do you people want people to do? buy a Fury X?
What a joke.
>>54628598
>not even 60fps
God damn I can't wait for Vega to shit all over this in October. Wonder what nVidia fanboys are going to say then.
>>54628812
God damn I can't wait for Big Pascal to shit all over Vega next year. Wonder what AMD fanboys are going to say then.
>>54628812
Vega comes out:
>w-who needs 4K at 60fps? 4K is a meme lol!
>>54626636
try $450. Learn2Ebay
>>54628890
>buying GPU from ebay
enjoy your bitcoin farmed POS
>>54628902
I bought a 290x on ebay, put a cooler on it, overclocked it myself, and have been running it buttery smooth and cool as ice for the last 12 months. Eat shit.
>>54628922
>I didn't get fucked this one time
wew
>>54628812
>>54628841
jokes on you faggots I'm waiting for both
>>54628932
literally no one has farmed bitcoins with 980ti's. nobody.
if you buy a 980ti on ebay right this minute its from some spoiled rich kid who bought one last summer, played dota and cod on it, and is selling it for a 1080. that card is going to be fine nine times out of ten
>>54628953
enjoy getting gimped by driver updates then
>>54628199
>760 better than a 280x
>960 better than a 290x
Looks like it's a shit benchmark
>>54629574
Project CARS is just straight up broken on AMD cards. I think it's the worst example of AMD being unable to figure out Gameworks in history.
>>54627370
screencapped this gold
>>54626903
you mean 117% performance for 127% the price.
you're representation of the data is just as shitty as the nvidia shills.
>>54626636
>still no hardware Async compute
still no hardware Async compute
>still no hardware Async compute
still no hardware Async compute
>still no hardware Async compute
still no hardware Async compute
nVidiots on BTFO status
>>54628598
>Nvidia won.
They fucking better considering its going against last gen hardware
>>54629604
Wasn't it because amd cards can't handle physx so it was put on the cpu?
>>54629725
Yes, you're right. Not technically gameworks.
>>54629691
DELETE THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MODS UFKCING MODS FUCKING DELETE THIS!! STOP!!
>>54628221
Can you just not update the drivers?
>>54629674
>you mean
Yes. (Assuming you meant '127.3%' by '127%')
He also means exactly what he said, because those two statements are identical. If they don't mean the same to you, you have bigger problems
>>54629739
Very stupid to have a game depend so heavily on physx in my opinion, not just because of amd performance though.
>>54629674
>autism: the post
>>54629820
Yes you are
>>54628569
AA makes little sense at high resolutions
1080 Uses Much Less Wattage Power
>>54627010
No, Nvidia and their paid shills are just being sneaky as usual and comparing it to stock 980 Tis with their boost clock suppressed in order to widen the gap. Once you start overclocking both cards the 980 Ti rapidly gains ground, since it has more CUDA cores and Pascal is nothing more than a die shrink. In the end the 1080 manages a 15% bump based on a 40% raw clock speed increase alone.
>>54627257
You're the fucking retard if you think that AIB partners are going to price their premium cards lower than Nvidia's shitty housefire blower. At absolute best you might get an even shittier plastic blower for $599. Anything like the Gigabyte G1, Asus Strix or EVGA SC/FTW will be priced bare minimum the same as the reference card.
>>54626636
I still remember when waiting for next gen cards involved getting more frames per dollar expended. Now we've got a card with a 1:1 or even inferior fps/cost ratio compared with older cards with the new Doom being the only exception. What a shame
Someone post the nvidia 980 housefire meme picture
>>54631837
I don't have the 980 memes
>>54631778
>paid shills
Anandtech? Grasp at a lot of straws?
>256bit memory bus
>Shit 4k performance
>Housefire despite being 16nm
Argh polaris needs to hurry the fuck up i am now on intergrated because i sold my 770
>>54631913
May 27th = Polaris reveal
>>54631919
ive been hearing AMD would bring out new shit since last year.
Guess im stuck on Intel until 2017
>>54631931
Polaris is probably launching in mid/end June
>>54626636
what will happen in next 3 months:
1. 1070 will be released before 490x
2. 980ti will start losing to 1070 in benchmark about 15%
3. People will rush buying 1070(agian)
4. people will start frantically defending 1070 when it will start losing to 490
business as usual
>>54631938
I can only hope.
Nvidia's 16nm is a dud whats the point of it if they run 2.0ghz+ clocks at 100 degrees
>>54631970
you save money on heating.
What a disaster.
>>54632017
WHAT THE FUCK?
>>54632046
Sorry, ill delete it right now.
>>54627638
>80c
>>54627370
Oh god my sides
>1080 has Async Computing
>Have to turn it off for better performance
Your average Nvidiot
>>54627370
>>54632017
>mfw gimpworks
>mfw ATI Firedeon
>>54632359
Nvidiots can't come back from this. They're done. Sell your GTX Housefires and just give up.
>>54628446
Calm down, Pajeet.
>>54627169
More idiots, card for will be available for pre order this Friday, evga, Asus, and maybe Msi will be available on the 27th. Both would be shipped at the same time. If anything you might get a founders edition 2 days earlier.
Do nvidicucks ever know they are getting gimped?
>>54632359
top kek
Fuck off to /v/ with this shit.
>>54635212
bump
Why are people even benchmarking 4k when nobody uses it and the framerates aren't even use able yet?
>>54635212
>>54635274
double bump
>>54635492
Whats the point of benchmarking?
>>54628490
Not low end if theyre going to build off the r9 300 series. Itll probably be right in the middle of 1070 and 1080 performance, at probably a better efficiency since its on 14nm
>>54626636
The main benifit will be VR applications. But I sure won't be paying for a 1080. I'm looking for a 480/1060, and hopefully multigpu will finally work well enough that I can eventually add another one and use a VR HMD
>>54635492
>4k when nobody uses it and the framerates aren't even use able yet?
I've played SHOC and CoP at 4096 x 2160 resolution for the last two years and GTX980 never dips below 60fps.
Everything i play on non-win environment, runs without at problem at that resolution.
>>54635212
>>54635274
Bump
>desu
Fucking shills
>tfw still no godtier animu waifu gaems
>>54628259
It is but this shitty board has a bunch of AMD marketers being intellectually dishonest. What happens is that Kepler is pretty shit at tesselation and gameworks features are usually very tesselated. Just turn them off and you'll run the game perfectly fine as you should. There's no such thing as "I updated my drivers and then lost 10 fps" or something and I dare anyone to prove me wrong. This is pure horse shit from these desperate AMD cultists spreading their FUD to shill for this garbage irrelevant brand.
Does anyone know if the Polaris cards are going to have HEVC hardware decoding?
>>54636807
So you're saying that it's still nvidia fault for shitting it up with game works, but people are calling it the wrong thing. Thanks that helps.
>>54636846
Yeah, they shouldn't implement new optional features because the outdated product can't handle them alright. That sounds like the definition of pushing things forward.
Retard.
>>54636859
Yeah bro, all that tesselation really helped in crisis 2
>>54636844
yes, that was said by AMD engineers yesterday at the webinar
How do two 660ti's running SLI fare these days? The last game i played was DaS3 with everything at max at 1920x1080, never once dipped below 60fps. So im wondering if there is any point in me upgrading (this year)? I dont even play that many games desu.
faggot here, what's Async, is it important?
>>54636859
>underground ocean of tessellation
>trillions of cubes for a solid block of rock
>haha it's betturr u poorfag xdd
>>54640144
Asyncronous Compute. It's not important. It might be in the future (2+years from now at least)
>>54641062
why is it a meme then?
>1080: $699
yea, if you buy the retarded shitty ass stock model
