[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Everybody arguing about gtx 1080 and Pascal being Fermi 2. Me
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 2
File: 71wdTZXkokL._SL1306_.jpg (131 KB, 1306x1306) Image search: [Google]
71wdTZXkokL._SL1306_.jpg
131 KB, 1306x1306
Everybody arguing about gtx 1080 and Pascal being Fermi 2.
Me still rocking a phenom ii x4 oc to 4ghz, a gtx 760,4 GB RAM and a 1080p 60hz monitor.
Should Zen,Polaris,Pascal make me break the bank or upgrading basically became a meme ?
>>
>>54612214
>phenom ii x4
Jesus Christ man.
>>
Just buy Intel. No point in waiting months for Zen when it will probably be a huge disappointment like Bulldozer.

Your 760 should do you fine for years unless you absolutely need max gaymen quality.
>>
>>54612214
Just remember that you own the last created X86 CPU architecture without built-in NSA binary blobs.
>>
>>54612375
NSA binary blobs?
>>
Are you me? Exact same build doing me just fine.

The few games (aoe2, quack live and insurgency) I play run fine already but being able to play the newest shit on super ultra settings might be nice.

Answer to the question: just wait and see. Personally I think so.
>>
Also running an X4 965. Was playing Fallout 4 recently and some other stuff well enough to get by. I've gone this long, no problem waiting a bit longer. I'd really like to support AMD because competition is good, but I wouldn't have an issue settling for Intel if they fuck up yet again.
>>
>>54612255
I agree. Get a 6800K during the summer. Should hold you forever if that old Phenom II got you this far.
>>
File: aos_crazy_gpu2.png (23 KB, 582x728) Image search: [Google]
aos_crazy_gpu2.png
23 KB, 582x728
>>54612255
What was so disappointing about bulldozer? It was a heavily multithreaded architecture.
It actually does better now that programs are more multithreaded
Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 2

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.