PicoTorrent
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Do you use PicoTorrent, do you like it?
>>54611990
No; no.
rtorrent
No, dunno.
Deluge.
>>54612034
This.
If you can't into ncurses, use rutorrent.
>>54611990
Looks nice. I'm going to follow the development.
Does it support magnet links?
>>54612148
Yes it does.
>>54611990
I'm forever faithful to Transmission.
>>54612044
this. Deluge holds the number 1 spot.
>>54612460
Deluge is fucking trash compared to qBittorrent.
>>54612572
qBit can't even into decent icons, pls
>>54612460
>>54612615
>written in python
Lol
>>54612615
And Deluge can't even into auto shutdown
Last I checked anyways which was like 2 years ago. There was something else about it that was pissing me off too but I can't remember what, I think it was crashing a lot or eating up a lot of memory? Whatever, never looked back. qBittorrent's the king right now.
>>54611990
No, but it looks nice and compact. Is there a web viewer for it?
I've been using qBittorrent for the past couple of years, and it worked fine until around 3000 torrents. Now the UI randomly freezes for 10 seconds. Kind of annoying. And no, I don't have them all in view at the same time.
>>54612692
Not as of right now, I do know the source is available on Github, so if you like you can always get into that.
Tested it a while ago. It was not "pico" by any means. The install files were much larger than other clients like transmission, utorrent(half a meg), qtorrent, etc.
Its bloated
>>54613121
PicoTorrent > 2.9MB
Transmission-QT > 15 to 18.2 MB (Windows)
uTorrent > 2.9MB
QTorrent > 16.35
.EXE Install files from official source.
U talk shit.
>>54612664
>>54612572
this reminds me of that shill admitting he is a shill thread
>>54611990
>Stalled
>>54615051
But uTorrent is only like 300kb
>>54615259
Like 7 years ago
>>54615051
yeah because surely installation size everything about usability and performance of application
Which version of uTorrent is best, you ask? 2.0.4
>>54615907
No I haven't said that. I just said that
>>54613121
Is wrong.
>>54615051
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/libtorrent-rasterbar/
LibTorrent itself is already 1.5 -> 6.4 MB as a binary, which all of these use. Perhaps the Qt things come with a bunch of Qt stuff.
>>54615995
I'm aware, but I don't care about the install size, and which advanced setting come that I don't use anyway. I just need clean and working torrent client, and PicoTorrent provides that to me.
>>54616019
Eh.. okay. Have fun with that.
>>54616067
Which highly advanced settings do you use at all?
>>54616091
First these two things I changed.
My HDD is not the fastest, poor thing, so I allow QB a max of 1536 MB of RAM to not have those stalled messages.
>>54616091
>>54616168
And then I don't bother limiting anything.
>>54616091
>>54616168
>>54616187
And I am quite fond of these two options. Heavily reduces fragmentation and it makes me always sure everything is a-okay.
Don't worry, it's not so difficult.
>>54612647
Python is a great language faggot shut up
I like deluge
>>54611990
I was expecting this to be proprietary freeware trash. Looks like a solid client, thanks OP.
>>54615907
That's literally what you implied in your original post.
>>54611990
nope qb
>>54611990
>Do you use PicoTorrent
No, I use microTorrent :^)
>>54618235
BTFO
>>54611990
>Windows Only.
>Being worthless.
>>54618235
Haha
>>54617781
You're welcome sir
Forever Transmission-QT
>>54611990
does it support https trackers?
