Does anyone else think those non-logging VPN providers like Mullvad, PIA or Nord VPN are honey pots?
The service their providing sounds too good to be true. Why would they risk legal problems for a few thousand dollars a month?
>>54609569
finger.nose
>>54609569
>Why would they risk legal problems for a few thousand dollars a month?
Because where they're located there aren't legal problems from it.
>>54609569
maybe they just believe in freedom
>>54610269
>because none of their traffic routes through US fiber...
Ask Kim Dotcom how well that argument works. You should assume that every commercial VPN is logging. Nobody is going to jail for you.
>>54610634
if your adversaries are ad-tracking companies or copyright trolls, a good VPN is enough. if your adversaries are three-letter agencies, it probably isn't. It might still be useful, but you need other things in addition.
Also what he did wrong was being high-profile and ostentatious about his file-locker company. If he'd just started a vanilla fly-by-night one and folded it up and started it over again under a new name when pressured, he'd be free today, and still bringing in a bunch of money.
>>54610734
If your adversaries are ad-tracking companies then logs don't really matter.
