Testing or Unstable Debian?
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
So lads, do we use pic related or testing?
>>54551782
Testing, because I don't have time to use broken software and make bug reports
>>54551782
>using a server distribution on desktop
>>54551782
sid is better but churns more with constant updates
>>54551782
testing, I don't worry too much about delayed security patches on my desktop which is behind NAT and don't host anything
Arch desu
I spent a lot more time on Testing than Sid so it's hard to really rate Sid.
>>54551782
Testing is literally just sid with a 3 day waiting period on updates. If you think anything broken is going to get fixed in 3 days before it reaches you, you're wrong.
>>54552391
10-15 days actually for the most part.
>>54551782
I use sid, but imo it's smarter for 90% of people to use testing.
Stable.
Don't use testing or unstable if you miss updated packages. Unless you're actively developing for Debian, don't use use these branches. As a user, use stable with backports instead. Or just use Ubuntu (no shame in this) if you don't find enough updated packages.
