>linux font rendering
Linux font rendering (upscaled without interpolation).
>>54546354
Same but on non-web text that's smoothed better.
>>54545623
Wangblow$
>>54545623
Much nicer than windows.
>>54545623
Linux font rendering
>>54545623
still better than cleartype/directwrite shit
My fonts look fine in Linux
Ahhh the good old "I ran out of arguments against linux so I complain about something retarded like the font rendering" thread.
chromeos master race
>>54545623
I don't understand this meme.
>>54546660
Uhh.. You might want to enable sub pixel rendering
>>54546516
and here's OS X font rendering
sidenote, more sites should have dead simple desktop clients like this
>>54546713
My god, i dont even like OSX but its font rendering makes me hard.
>>54546516
>>54546713
>wiki to dog's anus tier city
>>54546609
danm right
>>54546642
Are you trying to prove something? Zooming into a website will still keep the fonts clean on any OS.
>>54545623
What does the kernel have to do with font rendering?
>Windows font rendering
>>54546713
Of course yours looks better, it's higher resolution
>>54546713
That looks like shit, desu
>>54546758
I lived there for several years
assuming employment isn't a problem I'll take it over San Francisco or New York any day without question. Can't really compare it to any other major cities though.
>>54546820
>using a LoDPI screen in 2016
>>54546819
>opera
>>54546838
I'm a student, I use what I can get.
You're not making a useful comparison of font rendering, was just pointing that out
Huh?
>>54546819
>opera
>menú
>>54546838
you're probably white so were treated as a god there, of course you prefer that shithole. you're the scum of the earth
>>54546880
That looks really bad compared to >>54546516
>>54546880
>that hideous default sans-serif
OS X is the undisputed master
>>54546880
Deja Sans and its variants are so fucking ugly. Why is it so wide?
>>54546912
nah, I look like a half-asian so for the most part I was treated like any other person. on trains for instance japanese people would often make halos of empty space around other foreigners but that never happened to me
>>54546950
Uhhh... Yours does look better than his but it still looks like shit
>>54546934
I have less hinting, and I like it that way.
>>54546950
>>54546975
What do you suggest, liberation sans?
Guess OS & browser
>>54546975
most half gooks look like full gooks you fucking brainwashed nigger
>>54546999
Open Sans and PT Sans aren't half bad. If you want something Helvetica-ish there's Roboto, and personally think the Ubuntu font family looks good
>>54547014
fagOs and Fagowser
> yfw even iOS has better font rendering than Linux
>>54546975
Because you fucking retards won't enable full font hinting since you're fat, blind and gay.
This is the true DejaVu Sans.
>>54547049
That looks like shit compared to >>54546516
>>54547049
And it looks to sharp to me. Literally my eyes hurt. Hence, why I'm using slight.
>>54547049
That's still pretty ugly.
Linux doesn't have font rendering because it's just a kernel.
>>54547049
you're trolling right? There's no way you use this shit right?
>>54547067
>>54547069
>>54547070
Kill yourself, blind fucks.
>infinality
>>54547090
Unlike, which places font rendering IN the kernel.
>>54547100
>mutilated glyphs are good and anybody who disagrees is stupid
>>54547097
Some people even use python so they must have a high tolerance for stuff that looks like shit.
>>54547045
Does iOS have the same font rendering as OS X?
>>54547130
>>54547129
*unlike windows
>>54545623
feels GNU/Good
>>54547129
> i like my fonts blurry and fat like myself
>>54547144
It's 99% identical except iOS font rendering uses greyscale AA instead of subpixel AA in order to support orientation switching properly.
>>54546838
sry, I have better things to spend my money on than new computers.
It's been mathematically prove that you can't have good font rendering unless your DPI is higher than what's currently sold on mainstream machines including retina laptops.
>>54547164
>>54547186
fuck off rms
>>54547049
looks like ass
use fucking droid sans faggot
>>54547186 (You)
This is true
>>54547204
Enjoy the "subpixel rendering" meme, low DPI faggot.
>>54547043
Solid /b/ tier post
>>54547215
> 2880 x 1800
> low dpi
k
>>54547227
>dots per inch
>posts dots
>doesn't post inches
/g/ - technology
>>54547242
dosnt matter
i fuck ur mom
>>54546381
My win 8.1 cleartype shit looks exactly the same as OP's image
>>54547242
fuck off faggot
>>54547284
That looks like shit
4/10
>>54547270
> cleartype
>>54547284
>96 font size
Yes, you don't understand at all. Your mother forgot to take folic avid when she was pregnant with you
W10 with MacType using the iOS profile
kill me
>>54547392
>that cringeworthy kerning
>>54547045
Only if you use a distro that doesn't have them configured and can't configure them yourself.
>>54547392
Im guessing you disabled directwrite on your browser... right?
Otherwise macytpe doesnt work for shit on browsers
>>54547501
>>54546713
>and here's OS X font rendering
"L-LOOK! MY EXTREMELY HI-DPI FONTS THAT ARE ESSENTIALLY 36PT FONTS LOOK BETTER THAN 12PT FONTS ON LESS PIXEL DENSE MONITORS!"
>>54546999
>open
>libre
>gratis
fucking miserable poorfags
>>54546999
>What do you suggest
Ubuntu. Yes, the actual typeface.
>>54546713
In El Capitan
>>54547392
Got a link for mactype? As far as i know the old one was broken
>>54546713
>serif font on a screen
Apple's designers must have all eaten too many radioactive dicks.
>>54546794
Typical Windows user
>>54549425
Serifs are fine on screens as long as you've got a high enough pixel count. The only reason computer-optimized fonts were ever different from print-optimized fonts is because up until recently, screen detail levels relative to print have been abysmal.
Now that non-potato screens are starting to become the standard, the age-old, finely-tuned, and battle-tested guidelines developed for print are becoming relevant for on-screen text as well. Given another decade or so there will be no difference between screen text and printed text.
>>54545623
>Windows font rendering
