![NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-1080-3DMark-Performance-V2[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/iLbBtbZ.png "NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-1080-3DMark-Performance-V2[1].png")
Hahaha! nvidiots on a suicide watch!
>>54516855
I thought reviews and results can't be released until the 21st, or something like that.
>>54516869
May 15 i think, but someone just leaked it.
>>54516869
17th
>>54516855
i don't get it? it's still faster than the titan, right? and faster than the 980 it's replacing?
>>54516855
I'm so confused. Is it nVidiots or AMDtards who are suicide watch? /g/ gives me such conflicting information. And just how long is it gonna take for all of these companies go bankrupt? Any minute now, right?
>>54516908
>2X faster than Titan!!!
>>54516855
Im confused isnt this showing good benchmarks for nvidia?
>>54516855
The 1080 is about 70% faster than the 980 according to that benchmark. Wasn't that what was expected?
>>54516855
About 24% ahead of the 980ti. About what everyone expected. Worth it if you get it at msrp but not more. Unless it's a special binned chip like kingpin or lightning.
>>54516855
It's over. AMD is finished.
>>54516929
It is barely faster than non OC 980Ti.
>>54516924
yeah in VR performance. this isn't VR performance though. it was always about 25% faster than a 980 ti in real world performance
>Leaving out the Pro Duo to make the 1080 not look like shit
>>54516855
>20% performance bump for $700
Top goy.
>>54516924
I'm pretty sure they said 2x more efficient per watt or something. Only a retard would take that to mean 2x faster speed. I do however recall them saying a 20% speed increase........which seems accurate.
Not sure if false flagging or just stupid.
>>54516950
>almost a 1/3 faster
>barely
Interedasting.
>>54516973
>sexy
>>54516945
Looks like a Bond villain --- runs business like a Bond villain.
>>54516953
>a 1,500 dollar Dual-GPU card surely is a competitor to a single GPU that's half the price
This just in, a more expensive Dual-GPU card is faster than a single-GPU card. Stop the presses everyone.
>>54516973
Not everyone already owns a 980Ti, you know. If you're going to pay $700 for 20% then yeah, you're a retard.
>>54516979
It seems you cant into math.
>>54516973
>sexy
absolutelydisgusting.jpg
>>54516869
17th that site always leaks stuff
>>54517002
24% slower means it's about 33% faster
Can you really overclock 1080? What if you cant? Will OC980ti be on par with this card?
>>54517045
2100 MEGAHERTZ
68° ON AIR
>>54516924
in VR* in games that use NVIDIAs tech*
>>54517061
so every game ever lol
>>54516994
the pro duo will be 1K by October and it is closer to a workstation GPU
Looks like 1080 is on par with 970 sli.
>35% faster than a 980Ti for the same price.
More like 980ti fags on suicide watch
>>54516945
AMD will never achieve 4.5
>>54517105
Not really. 1080 is pretty much twice as fast as a 970, meaning 100%. You never get 100% performance boost with SLI, more like 50%.
>>54517000
>Not everyone already owns a 980Ti
Anybody who can afford a 1080 likely does. The kind of retard who buys a top tier card for $700 is the kind of retard who has to own the best and upgrades every time something new comes along. Everybody else buys the second tier card and gets 90% of the performance for 60% of the price.
>>54517131
Look at the chart. 1080 is like 20% faster than 980Ti. 970sli is only a bit slower than that because of 3.5 meme.
>>54516977
No, they literally said 2x faster than Titan X but I believe they were only referring to specific VR scenarios where simultaneous multiprojection is used on the 1080. Of course, they did not make any effort to make this clear at all.
>>54517105
100/76 ~= 1.315, so it's roughly 31.5% faster than a 980 Ti. That would mean it would (theoretically) hit around 407.9% on that chart you posted, significantly faster than 970 SLI.
Real-world results may end up a bit worse but should still beat 970 SLI pretty easily. They probably didn't lie about it being faster than 980 SLI.
>>54517106
its only about 20% faster in games
>>54517105
I see my 290 is still relevant
>>54517188
I regret for not buying it from my friend back in the days for dirt cheap.
>>54517154
What?
>980Ti -> 310%
>970SLI -> 324%
Meaning 970 SLI is about 4.5% faster than 980Ti!!
While as on OP pic
>1080-> 100%
>980Ti -> 76%
Meaning 1080 is about 31.5% faster than 980Ti!!
Did you guys even finish elementary school?
>>54517166
>100/76 ~= 1.315, so it's roughly 31.5% faster than a 980 Ti
What is the logic behind those calculations?
>>54517139
Generalizing pretty big there. I got a friend using a 750ti that was saving up for a 1440p monitor and a 1080. He's already swapped his fx 6300 for a 6700k.
-Are you upgrading from a low end/ middle end card and want to step into 1440p @ 120hz or 4k @ 60hz? Buy a 1080.
-Are you upgrading from a 980ti? Why the fuck do you need a 1080 then? Do you need 16x hairworks and everything maxed in in witcher 3 4k? Is the difference between 35 fps and 55 fps worth $700 to you? Can you off your 980ti for a good price?
>>54517105
970ti will decrease to fury performance i guess
Too expensive 700$.
>>54517218
Dude.... Jeez. American education I guess...
Let me help you:
76 of 100 is 76% (76/100 -> 0.76)
100 of 76 is 31.5% (100/76 -> 1.316)
>>54516925
Because Nvidia launched a misleading marketing campaign making claims (or graphs that gave the illusion of claims) that the new card would be significantly better than the Titan X.
-One was 2x performance over TitanX*
*but only in VR
-The other was pic related, where adoredTV has extrapolated what the actual performance increase would be if the graph is to be trusted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jIDbZG1VxY
>>54516924
>2x faster than titan
who in their right mind would have said this? and why the fuck would you believe that? are you literally retarded?
>>54517297
Where did you get 76?
>>54517297
*131.5% not 31.5%
>>54516855
>3DMARK11
3DMARK12 when??
I want AMD to shine on these.
>>54517302
CEO said that on the scene during the presentation.
>itt dumb drones who are getting mad about marketing tactics
lrn2business faggots. just because amd is shit at it, it doesn't mean everyone else should be pulled down to their level.
>>54517218
The numbers in OP's chart. GTX 980 Ti has 76% of the performance of a 1080 (100%). 100% referenced to the 980 Ti's lower 76% is 100/76 = 1.315 = 131.5%. This means that a 980 Ti has 76% (24% slower) of the performance of the 1080, while a 1080 has 131.5% (31.5% faster) the performance of a 980Ti.
It's the rule of three or w/e it was called.
A good 980 ti overclocked to 1550mhz gets about 19000 on fire strike. 1080 gets gets 21000 at stock clocks. For $50 less than the original 980 ti msrp and a year later that's a pretty massive generation jump.
Fury x owners are severely cucked though. They get 14000~16000 on a good day and that's about it. Only 4gb vram and the same price.
>>54517317
OP picture?
If you have problems with percentages, just take the absolute values form the benchmarks.
1080 is about 30-35% faster than 980Ti
>>54517166
>>54517209
>>54517218
>>54517297
>>54517350
>>54517357
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/60822.html
enjoy this premium 2002 webpage
>>54517139
I still have a 560ti I gout for $230~ 4+ years ago now. I plan to get a 1080, it's way more than worth it imo. It's like a billion % increase in performance and $600 isn't much to spend for it now. I've only very recently seen trouble from my 560ti lately, so I think I'm choosing the right time to pick up a new gpu.
>>54517188
220 of pure sanctification
>>54517352
Fury X was never worth it, a total disappointment of a card. I was hoping that the WC would at least let it reliably clock up to the 1200MHz+ range, but no, it's fucking shit for OC too. Expensive at launch too, on top of only having 4GB VRAM.
>>54517372
Not sure why you're linking me that, I know the rule of three and applied it correctly.
ITT retards and trolls
>>54517377
Wait for gp100, aka ti version.
They'll drop the 1080 to $500 then.
>>54517404
If you're going to be waiting likely ~1 year, you may as well be playing the waiting game forever.
>>54517398
>Relative performance
>>54517417
nah 6 months tops
1070 looks like an amazing deal but I wouldn't even touch the 1080 knowing there's an obvious ti version coming.
>>54517404
I'm not waiting anymore. I have need of an upgrade and the money for it.
30% in synthetics means 15-20% in games.
Bleh, not all that good.
What does Ti stand for?
>>54517464
Titty insertion
>>54517472
I want to Titty insert Hotaru
I have a 670, so the 1080 is definitely worth upgrading to right? I could wait for polaris but I don't care about a bunch of mid to low tier cards.
>>54517464
titanium
Wtf need to see 1070 benchmarks. Trying to figure out if 1070 or 1080 for 3440x1440p
>>54517440
And that will be 6 months away from some other stupid bullshit new gpu, and that'll be 6 months away from..., etc, etc.
so what's the performance difference between it and the 980? 70%?
>>54517440
It's not going to be 6 months. It's going to be Q1 2017 at the earliest since that card is going to be using HBM2 and with the way these things go you should be somewhat pessimistic and assume that you may not be able to grab one before Q2.
>>54517462
Its fucking nothing.
>>54517562
Nigger look at OP pic. 41%.
>>54517526
What are you so eager to play, the latest ff port?
Whatever dude, feel free to cuck yourself out of free performance when the 1080 ti launches because you couldn't wait a measly 6 months. It'll have 1070 sli performance for the same price if not a little more than the 1080.
>>54517596
it's 70% you spastic. >>54517372
>>54517625
100-59=41. Do not overcomplicate it.
>>54517495
hotaru is my fetish
>>54517755
>>54517495
Shit taste.
>>54516855
That looks quite good. ?
>>54517779
Not when you consider it's $700 and a 980ti can be had for $500.
>>54517779
Not really.
>Going from 28nm to 16
>20% performance gains
>700$
>>54516953
Pro Duo is a stuttering mess.
>>54517779
yup. 70% faster than the card its replacing for around the same price
>>54517818
$200 more is
>around the same price
Lol
>>54517813
You can buy new 980Ti RIGHT NOW for 500$. 1080 will cost 700$ for a while. Do the math.
>>54516945
This graph is fucking amazing lol
Guys don't buy the 1080. The Ti will be along in less than a year and then you'll feel bad about not being cock of the walk anymore. If you absolutely need a card now get the 1070.
>>54517496
GP104 aka 1070 and 1080 are mid tier cards, the enthusiast one is the GP100, aka titan and ti. The 490x might bash the 1080 like the 390x bashed the 980, it's too early to say tho
How about that Polaris 10 delayed until October? AMD not even not competing anymore. They're just there.
>literally useless synthetics results
>>54517801
This so much
>>54517855
>500$
No. The ones that have the nearest performance to the 1080 are all well over $600.
http://www.amazon.com/GIGABYTE-GeForce-GTX-980Ti-GAMING/dp/B00ZJP9DMC/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1463094094&sr=8-5&keywords=980+ti+lightning
the 1080 is $599 MSRP and performs better than even a $700 overclocked, custom PCB 980 ti, with more and faster VRAM.
>its an amdrone suddenly thinks the 980 ti is good, episode
>>54517942
Found the marketer. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814500378&cm_re=980ti-_-14-500-378-_-Product
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB AMP! 539$
>the 1080 is $599 MSRP
No one is going sell it according to MSRP. 700$ minimum.
>its an amdrone suddenly thinks the 980 ti is good, episode
Are you retarded?
>>54517942
The 1080 is launching at $700, and board partners have no obligation to launch the MSRP models anytime soon, even disregarding the usual launch price hike.
>>54517921
>The 490x might bash the 1080 like the 390x bashed the 980,
>like the 390x bashed the 980
AMDelusional
>>54518016
How about you look at the graph here >>54517942
>25% faster
>15% more expensive
>muh new generation
it's a complete dud. GDDR5X is still way too expensive, but they released it anyway just to be ahead of Polaris by a few days
>>54517998
>10% faster than a stock 980 ti is somehow equal to the 1080's 25-30% faster performance
kek atleast you tried.
>>54518016
Actually look here >>54517105 it is more recent.
>>54518045
try ahead by 5 months
>>54517998
>No one is going sell it according to MSRP
Custom models are coming in June. Basic, bare-bone 1080s have already been announced, like with blowers that are obviously lower quality than NVIDIA's reference. I seriously doubt pic related will sell at $700, since there would be absolutely 0 reason to buy it over a reference model. It will more than likely be priced at $600.
>>54518057
>implying you cant OC it further
>implying 15% over that zotac is worth 160$
>>54518069
1/10
AMD's lauch event is in 2 weeks
New pics of Zotac's 1080
http://www.custompcreview.com/news/zotac-teases-geforce-gtx-1080-pgf-custom-graphics-card/29341/
>>54518076
>seriously doubt pic related will sell at $700, since there would be absolutely 0 reason to buy it over a reference model.
Availability. When a product launches and everywhere is sold out even shitty coolers sell like hotcakes, and with that come big fat margins. When the supply kicks up to the demand then they phase out the shitty coolers since they actually need to compete.
>>54517105
>>54517610
>>54517942
Why is the 295x so based?
>fury x comes out
>"hahaha nvidiots btfo, the fury will destory the 980 ti"
>results show the fury x is utter trash compared to the 980 ti in 95% of games
>"t-the 980 ti i-is still shit"
>"le goyworks"
>1080 suddenly comes out for cheaper than these crazy priced OC 980 ti's with superior performance to them
>"t-the 980 ti is g-good"
>"p-please don't buy nvidia's new cards"
kek amdrones
>>54518113
rice/10
>>54518115
Availability isn't the same as "No one is going sell it according to MSRP"
I doubt this is going to be the only one at MSRP though. Gigabyte always had their barebones custom cooler model selling at MSRP too and other companies did as well.
>>54518080
>implying it's easy to get a 20% overclock
>implying expensive custom PCB's aren't needed to get higher clocks and maintain them
>implying some shitty low end 980 ti will have good enough VRM's to maintain those clocks with enough voltage to the card without burning up
try harder
>>54518076
Unless they make it out of cardboard there is no way it's $100 cheaper than the reference model. Especially at launch when they will want to put all their chips into the more expensive models.
>>54518102
>a few days
>2 weeks
HAHAHAHA YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP
>>54518169
zotac models with that custom cooler is always the cheapest model and they're almost always at the base msrp. they come with poor overclocks though and probably have really shitty vrm's so overclocking will be a pain. eg the zotac 970 came with only a 20mhz oc from the factory but it was piss cheap
http://www.box.co.uk/Zotac_GeForce_GTX_970_4GB_Video_Graphic_1758830.html?gclid=Cj0KEQjw09C5BRDy972s6q2y4egBEiQA5_guv1rFhPNt3guSA8-aWXz-XkKxkknelRd350tkr_PKTMYaAuL-8P8HAQ
Doom looks so good. Is it DX12 though? I heard AMD kills it in DX12.
>>54518131
It's not, because it requires CF profiles to work. If you play new-ish games you will be mad and frustrated 90% of the time because AMD does not release CF profiles in time and/or they do and the profile is fundamentally broken in some way. I've got 2 290Xs and suffered through this bullshit ever since I bought them. It's great when it works but it mostly does not on game release. Sometimes it never works at all, especially if the game isn't a major AAA title.
>>54518169
The reference model is $700, the MSRP is $600. The reference model is the "Founder's Edition" card, there is no other reference card and there is no reference card that will sell at $600, nor will there ever be. There will be $600 custom models though.
>>54518205
The OCs are just for show, basically. Those cards are most of the time complete reference models with a different cooler on top, they won't OC better or worse or have different components usually.
>>54518228
It's all OpenGL no DierctX anything. AMD cards are usually very weak in OpenGL games, so I wouldn't expect much. If you want to run OpenGL games well you have to go NVIDIA. AMD is lazy.
>>54517041
What site?
>>54518305
for these really cheap cards, yeah pretty much. you can get good cards for £20-£30 more than msrp which perform really well though and these are extremely popular. evga and zotac release cards that aren't much much more than the base price but use higher binned chips that perform great and overclock like a dream. the evga one is the Superclocked and the zotac one is just called Zotac Geforce.
basically, its better if you don't buy a card at the base msrp but for barely any extra you can get a great performer.
>>54517610
>It'll have 1070 sli performance for the same price if not a little more than the 1080
Yeah just like the 980 Ti which is a full $100+ more than the 980 still right?
>>54518441
$100 is pocket change. If not you are in the wrong hobby.
>>54517496
do you even have a 4k display?
>>54518228
OpenGL, it will get a Vulkan rendered later on with a game update.
DX12/Vulkan, it doesn't matters, for those low APIs to be efficient the games need to be written specially for the hardware they are meant to be used, consoles already run on AMD hardware so most developers who port those games to PC target AMD hardware since they already know how write for it, on the bright side those games will run great on AMD hardware, the downside is that they will run like crap on Nvidia.
Async Compute isn't really a big thing like AMD marketing has been trying to paint it like, to begin with GPUs already are parallel machines, better than CPUs could ever hope to be, the async AMD is trying to push for isn't even true parallel, its very limited. You can only chose to do compute but no graphics nor can mix both. So you're stuck with doing graphics on the geometry pipeline and doing things that require compute on async on the compute pipeline like CPU AI or DOF, so you can have the calculations for CPU AI or DOF and in general compute stuff be finished before geometry gets rendered which can lower latency, but the real performance boost you get from it is that your hardware is now being utilized at 100% which is only a problem on AMD cards.
>>54518228
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okb3RVe2vbA
>>54517524
buy a 4k display instead man, they cost less and give you more pixels, free sync IPS ones are 550
>>54518377
videocardz
>>54518228
Doom is Vulkan a.k.a. the one you should actually give a shit about because fuck DirectX and Microsoft.
>>54518487
Delete this. Async Compute is everything.
>>54517524
Assume it's basically at Titan X level or slightly above, there's really no other spot for it to fill.
>>54518228
there were early beta benchmarks where the AMD Cards were wrecking nvidias
>>54518487
>the downside is that they will run like crap on Nvidia.
lol no. gameworks was literally made to combat this and since nvidia gets 90% of the pc sponsorships this will never be an issue.
just like everyone keeps going on about "amd master plan", nvidia has one to counter it and we've seen it even more with nvidia VRworks when they talked about it at the 10xx series reveal.
>>54518131
>Just ran firestrike with my $400 290 non x crossfire.
>23,300 graphics score at stock clock
>wew
>>54518545
Guarantee Nvidia had a talk with them after that. Suddenly they are switching to Vulkan.
>>54518556
Nvidia effects have been around for years, they got renamed to GameWorks for marketing, Nvidia has a long track history on researching effects and rendering techniques like those, most modern rendering practices come from them they give lectures and they sponsorship research with universities and Ph.D students.
A quick example, https://research.nvidia.com/publication/aggregate-g-buffer-anti-aliasing
Just by Googling "Nvidia AA research".
>>54518556
VRWorks is already on Maxwell cards, the version you see on the 1080 is just improved on and more efficient.
>>54518166
Zotac Amp! is one of the best overclockers and has some of the lowest temps of 980 ti models.
>>54518487
nvidia hardware also runs at close to 100%. when people say they don't even need async, they literally don't. async doesn't make amd cards better like they're neck and neck in terms of hardware potential with nvidia. amd hardware is generally slightly better than their nearest nvidia competitor which is why async allows better utilization of that slightly better hardware. it's totally removing the driver middleman for amd because the devs can do those optimizations themselves.
tldr;
>amd: need better hardware than nvidia to compete at the same level due to shit driver support and overhead
>nvidia: can use slightly worse hardware than amd but have great driver support which means their cards are always at near 100% utilization
i predict nvidia to negate that hardware advantage of amd cards this time round though
>>54518657
>>54518672
i meant gameworks literally makes devs optimize for nvidia cards compared to doing shitty ports between consoles which will have an obvious advantage on amd cards due to the similar architecture
>>54518725
between consoles and pc*
>>54516855
Well the 1070 should be on par with the 980. Nvidia lying once again.
>>54519020
nigga what? why would the 1070 be 70% slower than the 1080?
this ain't no polaris fluff, $350 for 390x performance lmao.
The 1080 uses 180w for 100% relative performance. The 980 used 165w for 59%
That means an efficiency gain of about 55% over Maxwell. That's good but not amazing considering the die shrink.
>>54518517
>videocardz
Thanks.
>Spent 1k€ on a 980 Ti 4 months ago...
Someone wants to help me with a quick death?
>>54519359
i just realised this is that fucking guy from tipsybartender
>>54519359
I can't believe how little this generation of video cards has dropped in price. I bought my MSI 970 in Nov 2014 for $319 with a free Far Cry 4.
I think the cheapest I've heard of *any* 970 is something like $250 on SlickDeals.
>>54519400
The stagnation has been unprecedented. In fact now that stock on Maxwell and 300 series is low, prices will start going up due to people that want to SLI/CF.
>>54516855
So only about 20% faster than Titan X.
I'm assuming the numbers for Titan X is a reference model too.
>literally selling overclocked 980ti as NEW
kek
So its just a rebrand?
![[Zurako] Sora no Woto - 08 - Phone Duty - We Have an Emergency (BD 1080p AAC) [7C19954E].mkv_snapshot_20.16_[2016.01.10_02.04.40].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/3upgRa0.jpg "[Zurako] Sora no Woto - 08 - Phone Duty - We Have an Emergency (BD 1080p AAC) [7C19954E].mkv_snapshot_20.16_[2016.01.10_02.04.40].jpg")
>>54516855
It looks like a solid increase, but you shouldn't buy this in my opinion. 1080p can be run at high refreshes, but cheaper cards can do that. The high end cards however, can't run 1440p at 120Hz or UHD at 60Hz. Why would you even buy it knowing that? I'm sitting here with the cuck card 970 and a few 1080p monitors with 0 reasons to upgrade. I'm hoping Vega comes out with a nice 1440p freesync monitor that isn't shit to finally make a good upgrade. You should check out big Pascal as well. Don't fall for the Apple meme.
>>54520114
32% faster than a 980 ti, 27% faster than a titan x and 70% faster than a 980. Pretty good if you ask me.
>>54519400
EVGA cards go on sale for $220 often.
>>54520517
B-stock? I've never seen a 970 for less that like 280 US after rebates.
>>54520551
I bought this with R6 siege bundled with it. I should have probably waited, but my 670 was acting up in certain parts of games and I wanted a replacement. I would have gone with the 390, but Hawaii sucks at multi monitor power consumption and it was quite more expensive. I still haven't sold the game and i probably never will. I thought the enthusiast cards were going to be out by 2017, I guess this 970 is going to be very short lived.
>>54517106
let's be real, most people buying 980 Tis probably upgrade yearly or biyearly, so at worst they upgrade a few months early
it's not as if they spent all their savings on a fucking video card... right?
Its like twice as fast as the equal last gen card why is this a bad thing?
>>54520643
If all of someones savings is 750 dollars they got biggers issues than a video card
Lmao Nvidia shills are leaking out into normie territory
>>54520625
pls buy one for me
It costs 15x more here in Brasil
>>54521069
Move to south africa then
>>54516924
>2X faster
so 3X as fast?
What's the fastest, at both stock and OC speed, 980ti version out now?
Doing my first build.
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/BVX3cf
>>54517139
I had an 8800 until last year
if you upgrade every 6-10 years why not spend a tiny bit more if you actually use the performance.
I mean you are going to spend quite a bit of time using your computer after all.
>>54520625
Where do you live that 390 is more than a 970? and the power consumption at idle is hardly going to be different
>>54521292
I'm talking about then. It was pretty even until that week. In fact, it was cheaper than the 970 most of the time.
>>54521174
you are literally a retard if you don't hold out for a 1070 or 1080. prices will drop on the 980ti at the very least.
>a suicide watch
>a suicide
>a
>>54516855
Not really worth it also most of those cards are reference and not OC.
The 980Ti could easily catch up to a stock 1080
Also im guessing we wont get higher clocked 1080s until next month, well aftermarket anyway these are gonna be sold out for months.
>>54517205
i regret not getting the 8gb 290x
>>54521292
A 970 is cheaper than a 390 in the UK. That's standard prices as well and not sales.
>>54519359
Just overclock it
Bam done
>>54516855
Reminder that Polaris is gonna be killer.
>>54521522
Remember when you guys did a rough estimate of the Fury X? It underperformed. AMD fucked up somewhere and the behemoth of a GPU underperformed.
>>54521570
probably, it's all dodgy numbers anyway.
But even so, the dodgy numbers are coming up trumps for AMD.
At this point, even if AMD's 1.4x IPC claim is bullshit and it's more like 1.1-1.2x it would still be better than the 0% increase for nVidia.
Look at the 1080 and look a 980ti, it's basically the clockrate carrying the 1080, there aren't any real architectural improvements from Maxwell to Pascal just a die shrink - we're seeing Conroe vs Wolfdale, not Fermi vs Kepler.
nVidia has cucked themselves until Volta - I hope the DX11 performance and pure marketing is enough.
>>54521570
They always do that. That's why I've literally just settled on buying a 1070 because amd manage to fuck up every single time.
>>54521620
I'm just going to wait until the shit actually comes out, just like the Nvidia 1000 series.
>>54521631
The 1070 looks like an amazing buy, but people but low hgih end cards shouldn't really be upgrading unless they're running 1440p. Even then, they should probably go for the Ti replacement or Vega.
>>54516973
>sexy
>>54521631
Except for the times which they didn't, which was every time.
>7970, a card released to compete with the 680 beats 970 in every DX12 test
I guess if you're a complete slave, you'd just unwittingly buy nVidia - I had higher hopes for /g/ though.
>Nvidia promises the 1080 to be 4X the performance of a Titan
>OP image is leaked
>Nvidiots b l o w n t h e f u c k o u t
>>54518474
I'll have a 4k display as soon as single GPUs come out that can power them at a decent framerate, which I'm hoping for this gen. Also VR.
>>54521699
You mad? Yeah, you mad.
>amdrones getting this triggered because people aren't buying amd.
>>54516855
>Polaris allegedly has 4000 firestrike ultra score
>Vega has literally twice the specs of Polaris
Whomis laughing now
>>54521620
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jIDbZG1VxY
I read the title of this video many times then i read up your post then i realized, when you match up 1080 clock speed with 980ti clock speed, it basically the same card.
>>54521522
This
Waiting for Vega
>>54517642
That's not how that works, you dumb AMDeaf poorfag. Finish high school, bum.
>>54521947
wow i've never seen this guy call any nvidia card good. fuck me i need a 1080 now
>>54521984
1080 is just 980ti with higher clock speed.
If you run 1080 at 980ti clock speed, the result will be the same.
>>54517596
> he thinks 100 is 41% more than 59
How do AMD cucks even function? So many poorfags ITT can't do basic math.
>>54521983
>implying you aren't 12
>>54521998
why change what works. it's energy efficient as fuck and has that killer performance of the 980 ti. id buy that anyway day and even adored says its good and normally he calls every nvidia card bad
>>54522031
anyday*
>>54521998
>r9 390 is a 290 with higher clock speed and more ram
>amd fanboys this this is good
>1080 looks like it might be a shrunk 980ti with architectural enhancements, higher clocks and more ram
>amd fanboys think this is bad
Wew these double standards. Don't matter to me anyway. The 1070 is mine come December.
>>54522061
By December Vega will have 200% 1070 performance
>>54522061
For a node shrink, yes, it is absolutely terrible
I live across from AMD and many of their engineers live in the same complex. None of the engineers that I know work in the GPU business unit want to spill the beans on Vega and Polaris.
>>54516855
If this is the 1080p 'ascal, I doubt the 1070 can match up against a 980ti.
>>54516916
I once saw two threads side by side, one was your average ITS OVER AMD IS FINISHED, the next the same with Nvidia. I wonder if it's the same poster... Somewhere our there.
>>54522115
Yep. Literally says "Relative VR Gaming Performance." Not once was it mentioned to be 2x as fast overall.
>>54516929
Should've gone with the same volume die size as last Gen 980 and a 384-bit memory bus.
Btw, that's a 40% improvement over the 980 idiot, learn to read.
Still a little disappointed by only 21% improvement over titan X but it's still nice, and the 40% improvement over previous Gen X80 GPU is still impressive.
I just expected more from all the hype.
If non reference cards have a far better improvement then I may get a 1080 nonreference, otherwise I'll just get a 1070 to hold me over for the 1080 Ti or the 1090 if they decide to add that to their lineup later.
>>54522276
It's a 70% improvement you fucking retard
Go back to school
>>54516977
No Michie kukoo said twice as powerful as the Titan X and 3X as power efficient, he left out the IN VR part though that's the conditions the graph he had displayed during those remarks showed. He also said faster than a pair of 980s in SLI and faster than a 980 Ti.
>>54522147
>node shrink 980
>70% improvement
>terrible
>>54522076
You mean like the 100% performance improvement the fury x was supposed to have over the titan?
'no'
>>54517081
Lol because every game ever is VR
Top kek anon
>>54522323
Titan x*
>>54522276
spotted the uneducated bum
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
>>54516950
This thing is at stock faster than a 980TI@1500MHz and at the same time the power consumption is halved, that means less heat and more overclocking potential.
I dont understand how this might be bad in the slightest.
>>54516855
>nvidiots on a suicide watch!
yeah, sure
>>54517154
>because of 3.5 meme.
educate yourself
...are 90% of /g/ retards?
...and I thought retard was bad
>>54517230
It's more like
-are you a retard?
-do you know how to sell your old hardware?
-did you sell your 9 month old TI for almost full price?
for me it's no, yes and yes
so it's more like I'm swapping my old card plus 50-100€ for a new card with more performance and less heat output.
>>54517436
do you even know what that means?
are you that stupid?
>>54522387
>>54522302
That's funny cause last time I did math, 16988 is 61% of 27683 which means a 39% gain.
>>54521174
I got 8900 something in 3dmark11 Extreme with my 980TI at 1500MHz
>>54516924
that was referring to VR performance. If you actually believed this you are retarded
>>54522147
there are really only retards here
how is a >50% boost in performance, by less far power consumption terrible?
please explain
>>54522514
Not either of them, but 27683 is 163% of 16988, which is the direction you're supposed to go in when talking about gain, old to new. So 63%
>>54517002
27683/20507 = 1.35 -> ~35% faster
>>54522514
You're calculating how much more 27683 is compared 16988 you fucking spastic
Last time you did math was probably when you were fucking 10. Go back to your basement.
>>54522514
retard confirmed
>>54522514
damn, is this what they teach you in the land of the free?
>>54517139
Lol. I've been using a 780 for the past three years and I'll do the same with the 1080.
>>54522577
>>54522558
That explains a lot, actually. I don't have a basement but I will start studying and practicing math again, now.
Wew, math, was 2006 really that long ago?
Everyone hush. Someone has already calculated this.
>>54522614
>>54522617
Wait... so then 60-70% gains is the norm? So this is nothing special and not a big deal but rather to be what was expected and in turn just as much of a disappointment due to overhype?
780-980
980-1080
>>54522617
so people cant calculate that for themselves?
so this place is filled with >13year olds?
>>54522617
>62%
Isn't the average 70% more than a 980 like in OP's chart?
.66+.71+.75+.68/4 =.7
>>54522653
No one can be this thick. Please tell me you're joking
>>54522653
How can somebody be this dumb?
>>54517105
Who here has 280x and realizes it is the best purchase anyone could make if they are not willing to throw money away?
>>54522852
yeah my 280x is doing pretty well at 1080p
>>54518136
>things that never happened
/g/ have always said that the 980TI is the only Nvidia card worth getting. At every other price point AMD offer better performance.
>>54522894
Nigga /g/ was going mental about the fury x being apparently more powerful than the fury x. Then when everyone found out it was shit they used excuses like Gameworks were cucking it and all that shit. Amd fanboys still don't full accept the 980 ti is the superior card.
>>54522929
More powerful than the titan x**
>>54522929
>>54522940
The Fury X *is* more powerful than the Titan X, spec for spec.
>8600 GFLOPS vs 6100 GFLOPS
>268 GT/s vs 192 GT/s
etc.
For GPGPU or well-coded programs you *do* get your money's worth out of it. The only time that's not the case is when gaming, due to a number of reasons. (e.g. AMD's terrible DirectX/OpenGL drivers, AMD's inability to spend large amounts of manpower optimizing game shaders, etc.)
At the end of the day, how powerful a GPU is depends on what you're doing with it. Marketing will abuse that fact by using favorable comparisons (e.g. comparing only VR performance, or comparing only async compute performance, or whatever).
>>54516855
>Maxwell die shrink
>less than 10% perf increase
>no Async scheduler
Xa-xa! Pascal is fail.
>>54518725
why would devs optimize for the smallest market? (between ps4, pc and xbone)
i thought theu wanted to make money not fill a niche.
>>54516855
>faster than anything on the market by at least 1/5th
>suicide watch
>the fastest AMD card is literally doing half the performance
>Suicide watch
kekking
>>54523138
>forgets to mention the fact that less than 10 DX12 games have been announced for the next 2 years, at which point your graphics card would be decrepit and it wouldn't even matter anymore if you got an extra 1 fps on your slideshow
>>54516855
Why would the people that are winning be on suicide watch? Stop posting shit you know nothing about.
>>54523039
Put it like this, AMD is a performance muscle car like a fucking Ford Mustang. It has a really big engine but the suspension and handling are a joke and everyone laughs at it's fuel consumption.
Nvidia is like a Nissan GTR, it might not have the biggest engine but every aspect of the handling is tuned and will shit on the Mustang in real world performance and efficiency.
So yeah you can wait years for them to finally tune the card into usefulness 2 years later to get the performance gains.
Or you know, buy Nvidia then wait 2 years for the price drops to get the other for your budget build and win twice. That's what I do.
>>54523497
I wouldnt have a problem with dx 12 if it wasn't windows 10 exclusive
+yeah there are ~7-8 games announced with dx12 and ~10 more games which MIGHT get it.
this is dx10 all over again, maybe not as bad
>>54517060
>on vapor chamber that nobody saw on stage
fixed
>>54518164
it's like you missed the time when 290x was going around for $500-600 or was it 800?
I can't remember myself I just remember it was stupid expensive
>>54523604
The 580 had a vapor chamber. It's nothing new or worth showing off.
>>54522061
except they did it on same 28nm and everyone still said it's bad
nvidia did the same but 16nm and somehow they are better
>>54523740
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsQDTB3Na2M
>>54517302
Why not? Maybe these fools made a breakthrough. Weirder stuff has happened
>>54517139
Then they realized they got gimped with 3.5 GB memes
>>54523497
There will be Gameworks branded DX12 titles, so alls good on paper.
Nvidia fanboys will eat it up and say AMD sucks. While using no async compute in those games.
>>54516855
OC Benchmark out!
http://videocardz.com/59882/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-3dmark-overclocking-performance
and also gpuz
http://videocardz.com/59897/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-gpu-z-specifications-leaked
>theoretical 2x performance
>barely 20% improvement, not even meeting the 20-25% improvement minimum of a die shrink
SUICIDE WATCH lmao
Can't wait for polaris.
Help... are they really gonna cripple the performance of my GTX 980?????
