>A new king
Nvidia GTX 1080 for $599, $699 for collector's edition
Available May 27
Also GTX 1070 for a few hundred less, available in June
Who's doing worse tonight, AMD or Tom?
>7GB of memory on the GTX 1070
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>FOUNDERS EDITION
LITERALLY WHAT?
>open source it
SURE THING GOYIM
What is founders edition please.
Polaris
>open source something or other
i'll take it
Finally I can run minecraft without lag
WOOOOOO DAMN
I CAN AFFORD IT
YEAH WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAT
>>54417866
AMD
Also RIP Titan owners
Tom's job has been saved.
AMD can't even win the budget battle, unless they go apeshit with their prices and slash them to nothing.
AMD IS FUCKING DEAD
D E A D
E
A
D
TELL ME WHEN NVIDIA RELEASES OPEN SOURCE DRIVERS.
>$600
Is this a joke? You could have bought 980ti and overclock it to similar performance levels months ago.
>>54417887
Of course 2 x 3.5GB = 7GB
no joke
AMD is legit done. they cant compete with $380
NOW WE DANCE
My fucking ears
$599 GTX 1080
$379 GTX 1070
BOTH FASTER THAN A TITAN X
May 27th
HOLY FUCK
>mfw bought a 980ti 1/2 year ago
Going to preorder 2x1080s as soon as they're available. Can't wait.
IT'S OVER
NVIDIA WON
>1080
Faster than Titan X, faster than 980 SLI
599 USD
>970
Faster than Titan X,
379 USD
Above can be translated as
AMD is dead
>>54417913
Are you brain dead?
>>54417866
$2000 Canadian.
How the fuck is that affordable.
Rrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
So uh. What the fuck is the difference between the founders edition and the normal 1080?????
when does the amd panel start
>>54417920
If AMD doesn't pull through with Zen then say hello to the desktop monopoly
>mfw the price AMD sets on the Polaris 10 cards to compete with that MSRP
>>54417940
It won't.
They just went bankrupt.
AMD ON SUICIDE WATCH
WHERE WERE YOU WHEN NVIDIA BTFO AMD INTO ANOTHER UNIVERSE?
When's 1060?
>>54417908
rumors say 480x $300 at 980ti performance levels. That's why Nvidia made this paper launch today
1080
Holy fuck I'll be able to buy 980 TI for fucking $100 now.
>>54417913
You can overclock a 980 Ti to 2xTitan X? I don't think so Tom.
>1070 faster than Titan X
>Less than half the price.
I feel bad for anyone who bought a Titan X recently.
>>54417937
hand picked GPU + factory OC'd
Who /1070/ here?
>mfw amd
>post yfw you fell for the wait meme
How long until the non-reference ones come out?
Or is it worth it just to get a reference card?
GTX 1070 7.5 GB?
>>54417937
They probably limit how much you can overclock/disable it entirely on the regular edition. So in order to overclock it well you'll need to shill out an extra 100 shekels.
>>54417893
OC edition. Basically 1080ti. similar to the way AMD has 390/390x
>>54417908
I wouldn't consider $400 to be budget market.
Polaris will succeed at the $200-$250 range and be just enough grunt for most people.
is this a flagship card?
>>54417866
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOHqG1nc_tw
Is Tom fired?
http://oddshot.tv/shot/nvidia-20160507279597
1070
>256bit bus
Wow, fucken nothing.
$600? Pshhh. I'm getting two.
>>54417913
>to similar performance levels
This guy.
No Titan XL?
>>54417935
not that guy but
>In this scenario GTX 1080 is faster than typical overclocked GTX 980 Ti (~8700 points). However if we compare it GTX 980 Ti running at almost the same frequency (1.8GHz with LN2 cooling), GTX 1080 is actually much slower clock to clock
http://videocardz.com/59558/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-3dmark-benchmarks
lmao
FUCK FUCK FUCK I FUCKING BOUGHT A $320 970 A FEW MONTHS AGO AND THEY ARE RELEASING THE 1070 FOR 380
JUST FUCK MY SHIT UP SENPAI
>>54417963
1070 or 480...what comes best.
unles AMD pulls another 390 like with the 490.
Upgrading from a 7790
>>54417973
Except it isn't 1080Ti, it's just an early OC'ed card, before the manufacturers come with their own
A 1080Ti would be based on GP100
>>54417966
i always told fags to stop buying 28nm shit for 2 years
IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT.
IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT.
IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT.
IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT.
IT'S FUCKING OVER AMD IS FINISHED
HTC Vive = $600
GTX 1070 = $400
VR Ready for $1000.
Fucking Tom
>>54417973
>Basically 1080ti
That's a bold claim anon.
gtx 1050Ti when?
>>54417966
1080 looks great and you're an idiot.
>>54417937
metal shroud w/perspex window and LED lighting on the side
>>54417966
>mfw I told them all and they didn't listen
Why is the less powerful card coming out a month later
>>54417866
they are releasing locked and unlocked versions. the more expensive is unlocked for OC
>gtx 1070
>£263
i need this in ma lyf
>>54417966
It was easy because the current GPU's are so fucking shit. I just wanted something that can handle 1440p, not even 4k. Is that so much to ask?
>>54417956
It isn't 2x Titan X braindead /v/tard, it's a 20% increase at most, this is literally Apple tier graph reading
Also, the 980Ti is as fast as a Titan X at stock clocks, it's faster when OC'ed
>>54418019
Who gives a shit
>tfw bought 980ti 4months ago
A-At least it was used.
So basically we have to pay and extra $100 to overclock the cards?
>>54418019
No poorfags ITT, 1080 or bust.
>>54418000
yeah you're right, i'm an idiot
>>54418027
So people who are impatient will buy the most expensive card.
>>54417866
AMD will match or beat 1070 performance for less. Polaris 10 is supposed to be 980 Ti levels and 1070 is supposed to be slower than that. AMD has said they're aiming for a more mainstream price for Polaris 10 at $300-$350.
So I'm going with Tom being more fucked tonight.
WAITBROS
FUCKING
REDEEMED
WHERE WE AT?
>mfw dank memes on 1080
>980ti owners on damage control
if you sell it now you might get some of your money back :^)
>>54418027
Staggered releases aren't unusual
>tfw have to pray that EVGA will have the 1080 on their step-up by the 20th of June or I'll be left with a shittier, more expensive 1070
JUST
It's going to be sold out for 6 months probably. I'll just wait for some nice board partner designs too. So glad I stuck with aircooling as this thing probably is going to run pretty cool.
>WOW LOOK AT THIS 2.1 GHZ ON AIR AND TOTALLY NOT IN OUR TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED ROOM!
>YOU WILL BE ABLE TO DO THIS IF YOU BUY NVIDIA™ THE WAY IT'S MEANT TO BE PLAYED™.
>YOU JUST NEED TO BUY THE $800 VERSION TO BE ABLE TO!
>>54418027
SPEND MORE
GET MORE NOW
SPEND LESS
GET LESS LATER
Well, it looks like I'm selling both my 390x.
Anyone want to buy two sapphire 390x?
>>54417946
Polaris 10 cards are aimed below the 1070's, they're 1060 tier
This shitty announcement might make AMD price them higher, at near 1070 prices due to that completely shitty performance improvement Nvidia delivered
>>54418035
Yeah, but 100% over 970 and AMD cards.
RETURN UR 970 NOW!
>>54417866
tfw sold my gtx970 meme card for 400 bucks a year ago
still using my gtx570
should I wait this one out too, I mean all those neat gimmicks aside there aren't currently any ''game-changing'' games to care, as I see it
i'll wait for the 1060ti and upgrade from my 970 then, doesn't look like AMD is gonna bother competing with GP104.
>>54418030
>VAT
>EU prices
It'll be £340 for at least 6 months
>>54418040
I wonder how high none reference cards will go.
The best part is it actually comes out this month. Holy fuck. I really didn't expect it to come out so soon.
>>54418027
Two weeks?
GTX 1080 | $599, $699 for jew version | 27th May
GTX 1070 | $379, $449 for jew version | 10th June
>>54418054
This
Looking forward to their low-end cards. I bet even a 1050 will destroy the PS4 NEO for like $150.
WHEN DOES THE 1070 LAUNCH
IS IT REASONABLE TO ASSUME EVGA/ASUS AFTERMARKET 1070 @ $399???
>>54418027
Take a business course for once, AMD.
AMD is literally finished if the 1070 really is above TITAN X
For that price it's gonna sell even better than the fucking 970 did
>>54418056
WE DEM BOIZ
>>54418054
>Polaris 10 is supposed to be 980 Ti levels and 1070 is supposed to be slower than that
the guy literally just said at the end that the 1070 is faster than a titan x. i know what i'm going to be buying this gen.
>>54418056
I've been waiting for, let's just say, a very long time.
I...I think my wait is finally over.
>>54418080
The one thing you can always count on is Nvidia getting their shit out early to shit all over AMD.
>>54418098
o shit waddup!
I'm just worried if my mobo isn't compatible.
>>54417993
>>54417956
>>54417935
You can buy 980ti models that are 20% faster than a Titan X out of the box right now and more importantly could have bought them last summer.
Anyone who waited for Pascal must feel like an idiot now
>>54417986
>Only 6.5 TFLOPS
>Even my Pro Duo has 16 TFLOPS
>still runing a GTX 460
>thinking of upgrading by saving some money
>that 1070 price point
OH shit, I'm erect.
EVGA or Asus?
I know to avoid Gigabyte like the plague it is.
So is the 1070 faster than a 980ti?
ITT BUYERS REMOSE GENERAL
WAITBROS MASTER RACE
>>54417996
Well they dont have comparable amounts of processor cores, 2800 to 2500, what this tells me is Pascal really is Maxwell just shrunk and with some extra features.
First time I've followed the launch of new cards. When and where can we actually preorder? Surprised he made no mention given it seems to be coming out soon.
>>54418110
Seems fine. Why you worried?
>>54418097
Polaris 10 should be about 980Ti levels at a $300, still a great deal compared to the 1070. You also won't get another VRAM issue.
>>54418126
Yes
>>54418003
in raw FLOPs (single precision), they're on par with the 390X and Fury X
the stage is set, let's see what AMD deals next
>nvidia won the GPU monopoly again
THEY CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT
>BUY 980TI ONE MONTH AGO
>REFUND IT WHILE ITS STILL IN TRANSIT
I FUCKING KNEW IT WAS WORTH WAITING
SO GOOD
WHAT BRAND SHOULD I BUY LADS? MY CURRENT GPU IS EVGA BUT IDK IF I SHOULD SWITCH
>>54418111
>posting percentages
>Not posting actual gains.
980ti OWNERS ON SUICIDE WATCH
Why are there so many nvidia shills in this thread?
Founders edition worth it?
>>54418127
Thank fuck nothing good came out on PC this year, made it easy as hell to wait a little longer.
I'll wait for benchmarks and polaris.
No hurry.
>>54418027
They're trying to take the enthusiast market before AMD can, they jewed AMD again
>>54418093
Last time Nvidia came first with the least powerful cards, that strategy was a hueg success
>>54418072
>RETURN UR 970 NOW!
2late, should had sold a month ago before getting /gimped/ for three times straight
>>54418135
well I was bummed that Skylake isn't compatible with it so I figured I might be locked out of newer technology this gen
>>54418139
lol you sound so upset
>>54418111
>heavily oc 980 ti faster than titan x
>stock 1080 non ti 25% faster than a titan x
>heavily oc 980 40% faster than a titan x
>stock 1080 ti 60-70% faster than titan x
feels good.
>>54418115
>AMD
>Fury X 2
>4 GB x 4 GB
>$1500
topkek
Here's the real question. Will the 1080 standard be worth it? Or should I jew it up for the OC edition? You think the difference in performance will be worth it?
>>54418148
Only for 1070
>>54418143
EVGA is the gold standard for Nvidia cards
>>54418125
why?
>>54417966
>tfw all these marketing jews tempted you with $250 open box 970s and 290s and you held strong for Polaris/Pascal
>mfw upgrading from 6950
>>54418139
Are AMDcucks this delusional?
Do I sell two 390x and buy a 1080????????
>>54418158
I thought he said 1080 was twice the performance of Titan X.
>>54418116
my god she is perfect
can somebody that's objective and not a memefag explain how AMD can compete with this?
>>54418092
May 27th
>>54418126
It's faster than a Titan X, all while being at the 300 usd range, think about that for a second.
>>54418067
>Implying your room isn't temperature controlled
Do you live in a poorfag country with no A/C anon?
>>54417996
>and then you overclock the 1080
>>54418176
Sell your sister for a 1080
>>54418197
if Polaris doesn't suck and is priced competitively?
>>54418141
>inb4 390X is as fast as 1080 in 2 years
lmfao
Why is the 1070 not on the page?
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/architecture
>>54418155
By replying to you, it might sound like that, but not really. I'm glad Nvidia is releasing another great buy in the *70. The retarded price jump to the 1080 will not stop being retarded. Also, they can fuck off with their goy edition at a $100 increase, fuck you Nvidia.
>>54418176
Do it faggot.
Sell to AMDrones at high price. Exploit them as much you can.
How much could I sell a 970 for?
>>54418179
i think that was performance per watt. i doubt it'd be 200% more powerful
>>54418153
Did you buy a prebuilt? No way you can be this clueless and picked out all the parts to make a working PC
>have 560 Ti
>waiting forever to upgrade
>gonna get a 1080 asap
>mfw
>>54418176
Wait for big Pascal and Vega
>>54418197
better price/performance at the price points people actually buy.
480x is a 230mm^2 chip.
1070 is a cut down 310mm^2 chip
Both will have similar performance but 480x will be closer to $300 while the 1070 is closer to $400
>>54418189
She's pretty cute ye
>>54418197
pretty sure they won't be. polaris 10 is only 232mm2 and has less cores than the 290.
>>54418219
Based Nvidia man.
>mfw when i skipped the 900 shit and gamed on my 780 that rekt any shit at 1080p
>bought 980 about a year ago
probably won't be buying anything until 1280
>>54418214
not talking about in practice, just raw computations.
NVidia's always been behind with their raw FLOPs, but made up for it with good drivers and low overhead. now that they match, AMD better have an ace up their sleeve.
>>54418220
I'm thinking $750 for the pair. Doubt I could get 800.
>>54417911
Lhh fammo tbqh I'm sure you are the only one here that cares about that dumb shit. Smdh
>>54418229
yes fellow waitfag 560ti bro
we can finally upgrade
>>54417966
I've told my self this for the last couple of years. It seems to be finally working
GEFORCE GTX 1080
GPU Engine Specs:
2560NVIDIA CUDA® Cores
1607Base Clock (MHz)
1733Boost Clock (MHz)
Memory Specs:
10 GbpsMemory Speed
8 GB GDDR5XStandard Memory Config
256-bitMemory Interface Width
320Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec)
Technology Support:
YesMulti-Projection
YesVR Ready
YesNVIDIA Ansel
Yes - SLI HB Bridge SupportedNVIDIA SLI® Ready1
YesNVIDIA G-SYNC™-Ready
YesNVIDIA GameStream™-Ready
3.0NVIDIA GPU Boost™
12 API with feature level 12_1Microsoft DirectX
YesVulkan API
4.5OpenGL
PCIe 3.0Bus Support
Windows 7-10, Linux, FreeBSDx86OS Certification
Display Support:
7680x4320@60HzMaximum Digital Resolution1
DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVIStandard Display Connectors
YesMulti Monitor
2.2HDCP
Graphics Card Dimensions:
4.376"Height
10.5"Length
2-SlotWidth
Thermal and Power Specs:
94Maximum GPU Tempurature (in C)
180 WGraphics Card Power (W)
500 WRecommended System Power (W)3
8-PinSupplementary Power Connectors
1 - 7680x4320 at 60 Hz RGB 8-bit with dual DisplayPort connectors or 7680x4320 at 60 Hz YUV420 8-bit with on DisplayPort 1.3 connector.
2 - DisplayPort 1.2 Certified, DisplayPort 1.3/1.4 Ready.
3 - Recommendation is made based on PC configured with an Intel Core i7 3.2 GHz processor. Pre-built system may require less power depending on system configuration.
How did 10x go down to 2x?
Looks like a nice card.
Should I upgrade my gtx 260 to a gtx 1080?
>>54418227
No I build it myself.
clueless about what exactly?
I rarely freak out about pctech, but I genuinely think AMD is fucked. Even with HBM I don't think their cards can stand up to these.
>>54418197
Polaris 10 aims at the 960 price point, ie. below the 1070 while delivering 980Ti performance
Vega should compete or beat the 1080
It's pretty obvious it's like this, specially with this rushed announcement
>>54418250
as if
>>54417911
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=nouveau-fights-radeon&num=1
>>54418197
I read that many sources saying that Polaris is near fast as 980ti at ~$300. However, Polaris is already rekt by 1070 because it is just $370 and has an air-cooled. Polaris needs a water cooled (inefficient).
You can get 1070 sooner than Polaris.
>>54418235
All this delusion. You can't compete.
>>54418230
Big pascal? vega?
too far away.
although i don't like the idea of having to buy a g sync monitor
>>54418269
No, that card is plenty for today's games
what was the energy consumption of the 1070?
What kind of a performance increase can I see upgrading to the 1080 from my current R9 270x?
>benchmarks come out
>charts confirmed bullshit
>1080 is only barely better than the titan X if at all
>1070 is just as gimped as the 970 was with 7.5gb vram
>vega comes out and the 490/490X and Rage Xtreme blows them out of the water
>AMD wins again
screencap this. it WILL happen
>>54418207
I live in Canada so very few houses have A/C here. But that's besides the point, I'm talking about industrial server room tier temperature control, which I'm assuming you don't have in your house.
Can't fucking wait for those board partner designs. I'm looking at you, Gigabyte.
>mfw bought a new 970 7 months ago at $240
I should have stayed with the 670, but it was already dying ;_;
Lads, how much of a performance upgrade will I get when I replace my 770 with a standard 1080?
>>54418203
>what's a node jump
Also, the Titan X isn't faster than the 980Ti, is about as fast
GTX 1080 SLI
Why does Nvidia always have their reference cards with the shitty blower style cooler?
>>54417963
Depends on actual reviews and comparisons to AMDs new cards. I'm aiming for best price/performance ratio when black Friday/cyber Monday sales arrive
>>54418229
>>54418258
Me too! :3
>>54417996
DELETE THIS
>>54418278
>third party
I'm talking about amdgpu you tard.
nVidia does nothing for the FOSS community, AMD is contributing driver code for the kernel.
>>54418264
that's talking about memory
>>54418212
The real kicker is the fact that AMD got jumped on the multi viewport technology like when they did the same with their 5000 series and Eyefinity.
At worst, it might not make Vega but it should be able to get in considering the timeframe. But it's a pretty decent technology to have developed right now especially with VR.
Reminder to not buy MSI GPUs ever
Especially the overclocked GAYMEN EDITION ones
>>54418308
That SLI bridge is sexy as fuck..
Want.
>>54417891
>Founders Edition
Guaranteed no gimping by drivers
>>54418292
I think you're right. Thanks :^)
>buying the shittiest price to performance 1080
You niggas never fucking learn. Buy the Ti at $700 when it comes out next year.
>all the retards crying ITT that they bought X card in the last year
we told you to wait
>>54418264
It is for 1080ti&Pascal version Titan.
>>54418262
>2560 cores
AMD = cucked
>>54418295
>>54418302
No one knows yet, but possibly a fuckton
>>54418264
That's for double precision
>>54418229
>>54418258
>>54418314
I too have been waiting with a 560Ti.
Was considering getting a 380 last week.
upgrading my 3 yr old 760 ... yeahhhH!!!!
And now time to wait for 1080ti.
>>54418302
Like 3x at least
>>54418326
Fuck you my MSI 970 is fantastic
>>54418262
>256-bit Memory Interface Width
Is bus width less of an issue with gddr5x? The 980ti is 384.
>>54418289
>getting cucked by Nvidia for being an early adopter
It's okay if you want it like that, but you could burn your money too
>>54418264
You can advertise anything if you add in the small print that it only applies to some very specific use cases and only if you compare 8 GPU servers with 4 GPU servers
note to Google: Buy yourself some of those 8 GPU servers and teach them to recognize those god damn pictures of rivers
>>54418308
looks gay tbqh
>>54418308
>STILL USING THE SLI BRIDGE
DON'T THEY KNOW? SLI AND CROSSFIRE ARE OBSOLETE
>>54418277
it's true, the Titan X could only handle 6.1TFLOPs (single precision)
I'm not saying they are worse cards, only that it was a weak point that is now gone
>>54418344
Same.
Even if the performance increase over 980ti isn't massive, it'll be massive for us moving up from a midrange card from 4 years ago.
>>54418308
Hnnnggh. Just like my animes.
>tfw my computer wont have a goofy CPU/GPU combo much longer
7.5
>>54418296
What if I screencap you, and it doesn't happen? You're just making future caps for "MAD FAGS ALWAYS DELUSIONAL ALL THE TIME".
>>54418279
>polaris inefficient
>needs water cooler
Are you retarded?
>>54418350
It is since GDDR5X has faster clocks
NEW SLI BRIDGE
SOLID PIECE
do you think a 4670K at 4.2Ghz would be a bottleneck for a 1080? I'm thinking probably not, but I'm not sure
>>54418262
>Windows 7-10, Linux, FreeBSDx86OS Certification
Good thing it has BSD certification
>>54418378
>goofy
winky-wonky*
>>54418343
grabbed a 380 7 months ago for 150 on sale. I'd say it was worth it to upgrade from a gt430. Gonna grab the 1070 when it comes out.
>>54418295
Hello 270 bro
I've also been waiting all this time for this
>>54418390
Not even a 2500k Bottlenecks a 980 Ti SLI
>>54418384
it's a chunk of metal over a PCB, get over it.
Is there any reason to buy the $699 version over the $599 one?
>>54418384
Why do we still need a bridge?
Why can't Nvidia do it over PCI like AMD?
>>54418381
>Nvidia stock air cooler 2ghz+ = 67C
>AMD stock water cooler 1ghz = 95C
>>54418327
> Want.
> Can have.
> Will get.
750ti.
>tfw I waited
>>54418400
What about a 6700k?
>>54417919
I have a feeling you are right. AMD is going to focus on the high end and blow Nvidia out of the water in the enthusiast market but that doesn't mean shit for them if they can't move $800 dollar cards only popular youtube streamers can afford. Time for another rehash of the 290 with 10% improvement over then 390. Meh.
>>54418392
that's a technical term
>>54418398
hopefully it was worth the wait, friend
>>54418411
Crossfire is garbage though. Thank you bridge.
>>54418410
this
i want to know; i have the money for it but idk if i should drop 699 shekels for it
>>54417866
SPENDFAGS BTFO
AMD BTFO
>>54418400
Depends on the game
>>54418294
180W HOUSEFIRE
>>54418262
>8GB standard memory config
does that mean there will be cards with more from the aftermarket?
I can't wait to play all my shitty console ports on ultra in 4K.
>>54418418
>name i5 that came out in 2011
>what about this i7 that came out last year?
You tell me
>>54418435
That just screams massive inefficiencies to me.
>>54418371
I was more laughing at AMD but yes.
>>54417866
its literally fucking nothing, wait for numbers you mouthbreathers
>>54418378
>5820k 4.5 Ghz and a 7790
Nigga you dont even know
>>54418308
thanks doc
>>54418420
Polaris 10 is below the 1070 and is as fast as a 980Ti, much more people can afford a card like that
3rd world levels of poorfag here running a fucking 760 just waiting patiently for my moment
Is the difference of price between 1070 and 1080 proportional to the performance difference I would get?
>>54418414
Do you think that's actually 11000mhz memory? It reports as half speed right?
>>54418384
Why can't they just make 1 card specifically for SLI that is built as 1 solid piece
I havent gone through any of the articles on it yet but is nvidia supporting freesync this gen?
I want to get a new monitor but dont want to be locked into either amd or nvidia.
>>54418414
>>AMD stock water cooler 1ghz = 95C
Not polaris. Old architecture.
>Huuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Nvidia 100º reference cards!!!1 (gtx 480)
Kill yourself.
>>54418411
>send even MORE data across the same few wires
>that'll work out well
>>54418435
>GPU 101%
>>54418447
I tell you hwat.
>>54418411
>Why can't Nvidia do it over PCI like AMD?
you can already with 2 low end nvidia cards, on higher end cards it causes stuttering (amd has the same issue, except it's much worse ever since they introduced xdma)
>>54418019
It'll be a rebranded 970 with 2+2GB of ram.
>>54418478
>what's multiplexing
>>54418455
It's an open world game with lots of stuff in it. Of course it's going to need lots of CPU power.
Rainbow Six Siege is another game that bottlenecks on an OCed 2500k because of all the physics stuff that's going on
>>54418472
Freesync is destined to succeed, but Nvidia is very adamant about their close source bullshit.
>collectors edition
>>54418466
1070 or 80 would be a massive upgrade regardless.
>>54418389
nice gif mind if i save it?
>>54418270
Your skylake comment screams "I have no idea how any of this works"
>Really hyped by the performance of the 1080
>Want to sell my old 460GTX and get one
>Realize i rarely play games anymore
>Literally 0 reason to buy a new GPU
Meh
>>54418486
should be a non-issue on DX12/Vulkan
async over different brand cards means that bridges aren't needed (at least for those APIs)
>Forza 6 on PC FINALLY
>Nvidia 1080 at $599
muh dick
>>54418426
Crossfire generally scales better than SLI, it's why nvidia doesn't put out dual GPU cards
So NVIDIA is binning and overclocking their own cards?
RIP OEM Supply Chain
>>54418471
Titan Z was that and it was a failure, it was slower than the 295X2, since then Nvidia didn't try again
They did that with more success in the GTX 2xx days
WHO /1080SLI/ HERE
GONNA FUCKING DESTROY 4K
>>54418513
Buy a used 980 ti for like $20. They're probably hitting eBay already.
>>54418513
... fuck man. You're right. I only play fucking WoT.
>>54418510
all yours my friend
>>54418529
and your wallet
>>54418526
Probably just for a few months after launch
That's why it's called Founders
>>54418415
>Still using bridges
TOP KEK
>>54418529
Sounds like a single 1080 can do 4K no problem
A 980ti could run BF4 4K ultra no problem
>we need AMD to keep GPU prices low
>AMD not even trying to compete on this gen for high end cards
>prices still low
Explain this.
>>54418530
I am impressed by your memes mememaster.
>>54418097
>>54418093
As AMD USER and soon to be intel User welp this might just be good.
this better not be another bulldozer or a femi because i fell for both last time I'm hoping :)
At least the 980ti will get cheaper :D
too pricy for me but i can see that coming down good something i can buy in 2018 when i upgrade again.
So will amdrones finally hush about pascal being a rebranded maxwell chip with no dx12 support
Nvidias website says the new cards will have dx12_1 which is asynchronous compute. That means it'll be able to get extra gainzz in amd sponsored games. Nice.
Can't wait to buy my 1070
>>54418550
Nvidia is fearing Polaris, that's why the prices are decent
>>54418550
the prices aren't low. maxwell launched at $300/$550 for the 970 and 980 respectively. nvidia is already jacking prices back up to where they were when AMD was poorly competing against the 600/700 series.
>>54417966
>2500k
>gtx 680
>now have reason for gpu
Come on zen
>>54418523
Scaling doesn't matter if it's a stuttering mess.
>>54418505
GDDR5X memory is in very limited supply, so the few cards they have will be sold as collectors edition. It won't sell at the regular price for some time.
>>54418530
lmao
>>54418509
I know that anon but I was just wondering if I should just go all out on 1080 and eat only bananas for 6 months
>>54418530
now do a loss edit
>>54418550
Technology gets better and cheaper as time goes on
More at 11
But Polaris will be built on a smaller node, and could have some serious gains as well, so maybe Nvidia knows something we don't
>leaving the US in may 20th
>going back to the country where this shit will be 30x more expensive
should I just buy a 980ti?
>novideo comparing everything to a 980Ti
>actually only a 20% performance gain in only VR
>People freaking out
>>54418400
lots of games are CPU bound:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-intel-skylake-core-i7-6700k-review
I wonder if the 1070 will be really close to the 1080 like the 970/980. If so it's one hell of a value
>Hmm this 16nm architecture is pretty efficient, let's just overclock it to 2ghz, cut the HBM2 & halve the CUDA cores
>actually charge $100 more for the 2ghz version & the lock the other one at 1.7ghz
They gonna do a 1100 series
Gonna have to wait for 1180 Ti/Titan for 3840 CUDA cores & HBM2
Kelper all over again, the 780 was a 760 & the Titan a 780
>>54418583
>pay twice as much for a card that performs worse
anon pls
>>54418513
>Upgrade my 660ti with a 4GB 960 because it came with MGSV
>M-Muh pascal
>Sell the 960 half a year later for $175, go back to 660ti
>Slowly realizing my 660ti is a great card and works perfectly for what I play
>Still gonna buy a 1070
>>54418550
>no new top end CPU in forever
>only playing hype game
>no actually new top end GPU to compete with Nvidia
>only playing hype game
Even Tom is less fucked.
>>54418578
you can eat my banana for 6 months
>>54417927
>/g/ in 1 year
>mfw bought 1080ti 1/2 year ago
Wow guys it almost like this happens every single year!
>>54418589
>lock the other one at 1.7ghz
source?
>>54418560
THE GTX 1080 is only 1.4x faster than a 980, it literally says so on their website. Stop being a fucking idiot fanboy and putting up with this shit
>>54418331
What do you do when a better card is released the year after that at a lower price?
>>54418585
This is a bit concerning. I'll likely be sticking with my 980 Ti's until Big Pascal.
>>54418111
>You can buy 980ti models that are 20% faster than a Titan X
And cost $600
Or you could wait a month and get roughly that performance for under $400.
>Anyone who waited for Pascal must feel like an idiot now
Sure thing brohannas
>>54418588
970 OC's to near stock 980 levels, and people shat themselves about the performance before the memory issue was known
Even then the card still performs fine, and the 1070 will probably be the best value performance card for some time
>>54418516
Great, it will be a non-issue for a minority of new games released. That solves everything.
>>54418592
where in the universe does a 980ti cost $1200
or are you meming
>>54418578
if you're poor then obviously go for the cheaper one. Regarding performance, nobody really knows yet. 1070 will be faster than a titan x for only 370$, 1080 will be faster than 2x 980 sli. Take that as you will, wait for benchmarks.
>>54418582
>>54418565
>Polaris
Are you guys seriously holding out hope for this? I though it was just low power GPUs for laptops and shit.
>>54418550
>599
>low
must be nice being rich
>>54418588
Yeah, it's the 970 all over again, hopefully they won't do the same bullshit. In fact, they could do it again and they'll get mad sells.
>>54418589
Look at the Volta spike they have claimed, it's huge.
Also,
>buying the 1080
Morons, all of you. 1070, 1080ti, or get the fuck out.
>>54418364
Crossfire don't use bridge after the 7XXX series.
>tfw waiting for GTX11
who /900/ here
>>54418631
Polaris 11 is, Polaris 10 aims at the price point of the 1060, while delivering 980Ti performance
>>54418634
>Morons, all of you. 1070, 1080ti, or get the fuck out.
This, I can't wait for the early adopter cucks
>>54418632
It's faster than the current card at 1K, and on par with the Pro Duo at 1.5K though not in raw compute performance
This thread is exactly why everyone hates /g/, /v/ and PCfats. Consider suicide.
>>54418616
AAA titles will almost all support them (DX12/Vulkan/Mantle) during the life cycle of the 10XX series, quite a few already do
>>54418603
1.4x is 40% better senpai
is it finally time to upgrade from my 4870
>>54418604
The 1080 is very expensive and I would have had to wait more than a year for about a 20% increase in performance. I'd rather upgrade when enthusiast chips arrive rather that settling for the shit price to performance option.
What are you guys planning on using the new GPU for anyway?
>>54418603
The fuck does that have to do with dx12_1 support? Learn to read you fucking spastic.
>1.4x faster than a 980
So 140% faster? OK kill yourself please.
I just need to wait for the new Intel processors in 2017 to fulfill my wait autism
>>54418620
I'm talking USD
HEVC?
>>54418667
4chan
>>54418676
maxwell already has 4k60fps hevc encoding and decoding
>>54418670
I'm also talking USD
from what I researched the 980ti and the 1080 cost the same
>>54418667
Probably for playing games on my 1080p monitor at really high fps.
>>54418667
Bragging on the internet
>>54418583
If you can find someone panicking selling their 980Ti then snatch it up. 1080 isn't going to be that much more powerful from Nvidia's own slides.
>>54418658
Yes, Polaris and Pascal price war, it's fucking happening
>>54418667
witcher 3
Yeah VR for plebs!
only 1000 $ budget
>>54418668
>So 140% faster? OK kill yourself please.
>this is how dumb Nvidia fanboys are
>>54418687
But not the 1070, which is what I thought you meant
>>54418597
I'm waiting bby
>>54418624
Thanks for the advice anon.
>>54418667
I mainly just play f2p like Dota and Warships etc. Stuff a 960 could probably do fine. I'll still buy two of these 1080s though.
>>54418667
memes, mostly
What's with all the shills coming out saying amd is dead? Do we even know the exact specs of amd's polaris yet to claim it's dead?
So, 1060 when?
>>54418710
amd has already said Polaris is low to mid end cards
>>54418685
Only the 960, and only decoding
>>54418710
Yes, bad.
>>54418667
hash cracking, dark souls, forza, and other newer games
>>54418688
>on my 1080p monitor
Upgrade to a 2k or 4k monitor already or there's no reason for you to get one of those new cards.
>>54418720
and has water cooling at ~$350
>>54418667
gaming in 1440p that my 970 is having problems to do
Who wants to bet the 980 they are comparing it to is reference stock clock vs Founders Edition 2.1ghz 1080?
>>54418667
mining bitcoin
>>54418720
Why is AMD so scared of the high end shit?
>want to upgrade from GTX 770 SLI to a GTX 1080
>don't want the 770s to go to waste
god FUCKING DAMNIT
>People expecting Polaris to compete with GTX 1070/1080
AMD even said Polaris GPUs are going to be midrange GPUs. Don't expect them to be top-end competitors. You have to wait next year for AMD Vega.
SO unless Polaris is truly impressive for the price, AMD is already fucked on flagship battle.
>>54418688
>>54418706
>>54418701
literal meme
>>54418680
>>54418689
>>54418708
only correct answers
>>54418727
Nah. I have two 390x right now. Nice getting 130fps in gta v 4k scaling.
I can't afford a newer monitor.
inb4 press sample boost like crazy, while consumer samples actually throttle.
>>54418741
cuz they have no chance of against 1070. They know it.
>>54418735
Maxwell overclocks pretty good too, I doubt 2.1ghz was hard to achieve
My 970 is running no problem at 1600mhz
>>54418735
They're mostly talking about VR performance when they say x2
in reality it looks like it's only 20-30% faster
>>54418703
>buttblasted amdrone can't tell the difference between 1x and 1.4x in a simple graph you learn at the age of 10
>he explicitely says 1.4x gains over a 980
>gets told to kill himself because of his blatant mental handicap
>b-b-but dumb nvidia f-fanboys
Kek
>>54418735
See >>54418641
It's only on a few cherrypicked VR benchmarks , even their page says so >>54418585
But people are too retarded
>>54418741
They're doing the Nvidia strategy of launching the low end cards first, like Nvidia did with Maxwell
>>54418735
Possible.
>>54418746
Polaris 10 is about 980 Ti performance. They're priced as midrange.
>>54418378
I have a 4790k with an HD 7870 it works out pretty well with most software including hackintosh. The only reason I would want an nVidia would be for the CUDA cores for machine learning. Trying to apply for internships as a second year CSCI student and I really need something to separate myself from everyone else...
>>54418741
No money. R&D is expensive as fuck.
>>54418492
You still need the time to send it. And during that time nothing else can be sent using these wires.
>>54418721
wrong, all maxwell 2.0 chips support hevc encoding and decoding.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_NVENC#Third_Generation_.28Maxwell_GM20x.29
>>54418772
Nah 980 was good
This time they are really holding back on Pascal, we can get almost double the CUDA cores & far superior HBM2 right now, but no
Cause Vega isn't ready so Nvidia know they can get away with being jews
>>54418710
Polaris will sell for $350 and be around 980 ti levels of performance according to literally the whole internet. The 1070 sells for $370 and will be over 15% than a titan x at stock.
You make the decision.
Should I wait for Vega?
Benchmarks when?
>>54418680
I just realized i spend more time on 4chan and listening to music than playing video games on my ~$1200 fucking brand new PC. Actually i game like 2 or 3 hours a week tops, and i really don't enjoy video games.
But i'm still always hyped over new hardware.
A $200 netbook is probably enough for my needs.
>>54418513
>>54418667
>>54418680
>>54418689
>>54418706
>>54418708
>>54418593
We have a issues anons
>Our new $600 GPU is slightly faster than our current $600 GPU in certain use cases
Blunder of the century.
>>54418825
Yes, 1080 is more or less the 1050, GP100 & Vega is gonna shit on 1080 so hard
>>54418780
Just saying that if Polaris is beyond expectation, performance wise. Some people will buy it instead of waiting for Vega. If not they would go for Nvidia instead.
>>54417866
Ay yo hol up.
Wasn't the 980 $550 at launch?
>>54418854
Inflation though.
>>54418468
>11GHz
>implying transistors can turn on and off that fast
probably 2754 MHz with DDR-like signalling.
>>54418833
APU master race
>>54418741
Because Polaris is going to be a fucking amazing value series $200-$300 while Vega will cover the true high end(with HBM2) early next year, I fully expect Vega to rip the 1080 and 1080ti to pieces
>>54418815
Pretty goddamn sure no one is going to use HBM2 for a while. Production yield is just too low for anything but R&D at this point.
>>54418864
fair enough
>>54418771
>1.4 is a 140% increase
1.4x is a 40% increase you massive retard, holy fuck how can Nvidiots be this dumb?
140% increase would mean 10.4x the performance
See this
http://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-Percentage-Increase
You might understand how it works
>>54418815
They launched Maxwell with the 750 and 750Ti
>>54418806
They don't, only hybrid decoding/encoding, might as well say Intel supports HEVC in Ivy Bridge if you say hybrid is supporting
The only card with HEVC SIP decoding in the marker is the 960, Braswell has HEVC decoding too but not Main 10, iirc Fury doesn't have Main 10 either
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_PureVideo#The_sixth_generation_PureVideo_HD
>>54418741
Because the majority of the market is in the 150-350 dollar range.
>>54418924
>140% increase
is 2.4x
>>54418947
this
>>54418947
True, I'm starting to get retarded for being in this thread
>>54418943
Still 50 bucks too high. Try 100-300 USD.
>>54418924
>this amdrone math
KEEEEEEEK
Dumb amdrone can't even tell he's being baited
I hope the 1070 only beats the Titan X in niche uses like VR. Otherwise my 980 Ti just dropped to sub ~$300 value. I think we are being rused a bit here with the headlines. From their own info it just looks like the massive gains are in VR only which as we know is Noe Gamse.
>>54418969
>i was only pretending to be retarded
>$699 vs $599
what is the difference and why would anyone buy the $699 one?
>>54418971
How would VR gains not translate in to normal gains?
>>54418969
>lol I was only pretending to be retarded
>>54418924
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA WTF DID I JUST READ
DID YOU FINISH SCHOOL
>>54418994
Better binning
>>54418987
>>54418999
>10.4x
Please kill yourself
>>54418994
OC'ed from factory and being first, ie. being a retarded fanboy
>>54418997
It's some new Tech they are using that only benefits VR. I'm not sure exactly how it works.
>>54417866
I'm hype. Gonna get the 1070 this fall along with some new monitors.
>>54418125
?
I have a gigabyte 770 and its a great card.
Never had an issue.
>>54418994
It's the good goy version.
>>54418994
Are you the kind of guy who buys the kingpin cards so you can OC the shit out of them with your custom loop? If so Nvidia is cutting out the middleman for you. If not Nvidia is trying to bait retards into buying the better binned cards for no real reason.
>>54418125
You are missing out on the best cards if you avoid Gigabyte. Maybe they are bad for AMD cards since it's a market that doesn't make them much money.
>>54418125
Evga is way superior to Asus
>>54418971
>>54418997
I think the 1070 only will be faster like 10% than 980Ti in real games while like 50% in VR.
>>54417866
>Founder's Edition
Wow this is like shekel to the max still you guys bend over
So does this shit have async or not?
>>54419019
YOU CANNOT DENY THE TRIPS OF TRUTH
>>54419055
Basically, all they said was that it was faster than a titan X, an OC'd 980ti can keep up with it, but the big thing is the price on it
>>54419055
>new GPU for 380 bucks
>or used GPU for 450 bucks
>they're equally fast
Hmmm
>>54418994
$699 is higher binned meaning it can be overclocked better
>>54419055
>980Ti
Yeah, you can tell the 980ti is close otherwise they wouldn't have ignored its existence
>>54418994
Guaranteed no driver gimping when the 11XX series is launched.
Wow, I just watched the TOM incident. That was pretty awkward.
>>54418994
It's probably the same thing AMD does with the 390 and 390X
>>54419167
It was scripted you dumbass
>>54419167
Everything is fucking awkward. They didn't have much to say at all yet still wanted to talk as long as possible.
>>54419190
Are they trying to go viral?
>>54419134
i wonder why they didnt compare 1080 to the TitanX or 980Ti.
>>54419328
Hopefully because there is a new Titan and 1080 Ti coming.
>>54418667
vive
>>54418924
you graduated from this school
>>54418558
>:)
>:D
Fuck off back to Facebook you chimp
>>54418308
Actually being serious. Are you gay?
>>54419444
why, is that an invite?
>>54419334
i am more concern about the aggressive pricing.
Oh shit
GTX 1080/1070 are coming with DP 1.4 and HDMI 2.0b. Which means that they are ready out of the box for 4:4:4 HDR, and 4K 120Hz, which imo is about the single most overlooked spec point of this entire presentation.
>>54419533
180W TDP
Bretty gud
>>54419560
HDR is literally a meme, the spec is pure shit and ill defined, it's nothing but a buzzword right now
You could already do 4K120hz 4:4:4 (since you're on a PC you're probably doing RGB anyways so you shouldn't even care about 4:4:4) on DisplayPort
>>54418229
me too
Reminder that the The AMD R9 Fury Pro Duo (2xFury) is $1499
>>54419533
Doesn't matter, people will still want you to rate their build with fucking 1000W PSUs for single graphics card.
>>54419608
Anyone who buys that now is a retard
>>54419608
So was the 295x2, shortly after you could pick one up for around $600
Unless polaris is pretty good I'll probably grab up an R9 nano as soon as it hits around 300
>>54419648
You'd buy it for the workstation driver support, it's not meant for gamers, it still beats out the 1080 in compute
>>54419652
Thank you Nvidia for keeping AMD's prices down.
>>54419652
Why get a Nano? Isn't most of the cost due to it being such a small form factor?
>>54418924
Dumb AMDead poorfags.
>>54419708
It's down to like 450 atm, I just want it cuz it's tiny and has great performance per watt, but really the 480X should be pretty good too
>>54419732
>I just want it cuz it's tiny
SFF fags are pretty annoying.
>>54419760
I have an ATX case
>>54418639
Crossfire/SLI is literally a waste of money.
>Spend double for less than double the performance
>Double the power usage
>Not every game supports crossfire/sli and in which case you're only running one of your 2 cards, the other card you spent hundreds of dollars on might as well not exist
>Micro stutter
There isn't even the excuse of "oh well I want to max out games" because pretty much everything out will run maxed on a single card unless you're running some huge multi-monitor autism setup.
>>54419882
4K tho
>>54419882
Or if you want to use a modern resolution.
if I SLI a pair of 1080s, will my computer gain sentience?
>>54420450
No, but you'll have 4K.
People are so pumped for this and Broadwell-E. I have a bad feeling this is going to be the summer of huge letdowns. Wait for the benchmarks before letting yourself get too hype.
>>54418565
m8 the 980 was 550 when it first came out. they bumped it to 599 shortly after launch date tho
![SSP_190[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/qsP2d3B.jpg "SSP 190[1]")
![SSP_188[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/vQTOozu.jpg "SSP 188[1]")
![SLI-ULTRA-BRIDGE[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/EGO7UbC.jpg "SLI-ULTRA-BRIDGE[1]")
![1462586556410[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/jsNGAI4.png "1462586556410[1]")
![sli[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/m2GAstr.png "sli[1]")
