It's 2016, why aren't you programming functionally yet?

because it's not 1976

Who is this sperm worm?

>>54388434
because it's 2016

>>54388457
*penis machinist

>>54388434
That's a man.

>>54388434
Functional programming produces code that isn't.

Because 2016 is all about that logic programming

File: 1462123323092.jpg (104KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

104KB, 1280x720px

>>54388440
>>54388911
>he fell for the bloat-oriented programming meme

>>54388853
proofs, tovarisch?

File: 0007.gif (24KB, 128x128px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

24KB, 128x128px

>>54388434
I always factor my code into subroutines. Make code reusr easier and lets me track down problems faster. I program in C. In C, subroutines are called functions. So, yeah, been programming functionally for ages.

>>54388853
not if she has a feminine penis

I am, anon.

>objects

OOP programmers will defend this

>>54389724
>subroutines are called functions
I'm gonna assume you're being retarded on purpose

>>54388434
But I am, I do programming in Haskell.