>>54373749
VeraCrypt is much better. It has all known TC issues fixed + uses PIM as additional security.
For protecting yourself from data theft in case of device loss you can just use BitLocker and FDE provided by your SSD producer

>>54373767
Thanks!

The backdoor is in Windows anyway. Enjoy your false security. Whatever helps you sleep at night.

>>54374858
Prove it.
Protip: you can't.

>>54374871
Microsoft gives authorities time to do zero days before issuing their security updates. Install gentoo.

>>54374894
And God authorizes me to watch sh0ta porn. Now prove he exists.
Get laid.

>>54374925
They're right though.

You can't protect your privacy with proprietary encryption.

>>54374985
VeraCrypt is completely open source. Also depends on from whom are you trying to protect yourself. Government? Seriously nigger? Do you really believe somebody cares about your stupid shit downloaded from torrents?
Encryption, ANY encryption is unbreakable against thieves. This is what it's all for.

>>54375027
I'm talking about BitLocker famalam

>>54374858
So you have no idea how encryption works then?

>>54375140
That's all good if you plan to keep your system powered off forever.

>>54375140
If Microsoft has a backdoor in Windows, they could read the encryption key right out of memory.

>>54375027
>any encryption is unbreakable
You really have no idea what you're talking about right?
>completely open source
Running on a proprietary OS

>>54375165
Actually, thanks to shit like the Intel Management Engine, that might not even be true.

>>54375212
Actually I'm stupid please disregard this post