People who think "free software" is the same thing as "open source software" are worse than people who think "free software" is the same thing as "software available for no cost"
Prove me wrong.
akari~n
How did you manage to start a thread without an image?
>>54365770
Be a buddy, not a bully
>>54365770
This
I don't care about the licence. If I have the source code I do whatever I want with it. And I pirate my software anyway so every software is available for no cost.
>>54365783
>>54365806
Your tip has been submitted.png
Buzzwords
Those are nothing but buzzwords to me
I want to fug the akarin.
>>54365843
>I want to fug the 13 years old
>>54365858
>I don't want to fug the 13 years old
>>54365722
daisuki~ ^.^
>>54365843
how does this make you feel?
You're right, OP. People do not know what open source means. It means exactly what it says. Source is open. There are no other clause. The work can still be proprietary and the source can be released. Look at microsoft and nvidia. They release "open source" but any modification must go through their channel.
Free software is fundamentally about freedom. The four freedom of users.
People who give a shit are worse
>>54369376
>yes I would like more botnet on my burger, thank you Faceburger king you are my greatest ally
How about restrictive free vs permissive free?
>>54365722
Open Source is superior to libre software
Torvalds is superior to Stallman
Prove me wrong
>>54369758
Nobody needs to prove you wrong. You're already wrong on this website by tripfagging like a reddit jerk. Kill yourself, cancer.
>>54369758
>Torvalds > Stallman. prove me wrong
Tripfag < Anon. Done.
>still calling it "free software"
gee I wonder where the confusion arises
god think of a way to present it that won't immediately cause confusion and misconceptions with literally anyone
