is arstechnica still /g/ approved now?
>>53893019
>i can't understand the context of that article
>>53893019
holy fuck it's real
http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/04/cuckoldry-is-incredibly-rare-among-humans/
raising someone else's kid isn't what a cuck is though
sure it be apart of the meme but it's not literal cucking
Yeah, it's basically /g/ incarnate
I once read an ars technica article that consisted of the author gloating about how he argued with some faggot over email.
The entire article was just screencaps of his "EPIC BURNZZZ" and him taking the moral high ground for the epeen.
I promptly deleted my ars technica RSS subscription from my news folder and I also deleted the news folder because it was literally the last news source i was following.
My RSS feed is full of anime now.
Let the tech world burn to the ground, I just want to watch cute girls do cute things from now on.
>>53893048
>he doesn't know the etymology of the word
>>53893065
/thread
>>53893019
read that on phys.org first
ars is pretty shitty though
>>53893019
Arstechnica is tech illiterate. Their /sci/ articles are good tho.
>>53893048
>I learn things from /tv/ memes
>>53893199
>i'm willfully blind to the cuck scourge on our once-great nation
>>53893019
wtf I saw a tv program that said it was more like 25%, that was based on doing dna tests
>>53893048
>trying to define the indefinable
stop
We need to get a new insult.
Cuck has lost all meaning since everyone replaced faggot with it.
>>53893019
>>53893041
at first I was gonna call bullshit on the "cuck shortage" header but it's actually right there on the homepage
>>53893312
+(You)
>>53893312
I havent seen it used on mainstream yet so lets keep using it
1-2% is a terrifyingly high number
>>53893312
I'm with you there, I always preferred fag as an insult since it works well and a meaningless suffix insult
cuck just doesn't read as well
>>53893312
shitcunt
>>53893019
>only
1 in 100 men are raising someone else's child and they think that that figure is surprising low?
It hasn't been for years, since the whole 'social justice' fad started. It's unfortunate, I used to like the site.
Really wondering when this shitty le progressive fad is going to end.
>>53895335
>women in tech
this is what you get
>>53893019
>>53893041
doesn't this prove the genghis rape baby is a myth
>>53893065
I canceled when they made an article on Snowden account on their forum
Real daily mail level shit
>arstechnica
Its just another gawker sjw shit right? They used to be interesting in tech news, but its been sjw shit these couple of months
>>53895335
""""her""""
You sound disappointed, really. Like you had a lot riding on the cuckhold thing. The article seems well sourced even.
I currently rely on /g/ and ars for tech news. Both are shit please suggest an alternative.
>>53895637
Slashdot. You can read and discuss last week's news, today.
