>>53868347
>192 kHz

Fucking pleb.

>>53868347
>using .mp3
>not using .opus
there is literally no reason not to use it

>>53868347
you typically record at a much higher sampling rate you fucking idiot

I don't expect any of you neckbeards to have ever set foot in a studio, or to have done any music production beyond a shitty recording of "mary had a little lamb" on a pirated DAW using an m'audio midi controller...so I can't say that I'm surprised some shithead like OP made this thread.

>he doesn't soley use 320 CBR

>>53868824
Mad much?
Recording at192 kbps opus is fine you autist

>>53868824
Calm down Trent

>implying there are any audio interfaces that can record higher than 192kHz

>>53868857
>>53869058
Neither of these posts are relevant to the thread.

>literally no one posting in OPs thread has any clue what they're talking about