>he doesn't record his music at 192kHz
>>53855461
>he doesn't record his music in DSD
>>53855461
>he doesn't record his music on cassette tapes
>he doesn't record his music on 45s records
>he doesn't record his music at 96kbps
>he doesn't record his music to wax cylinders
>he doesn't just go to a concert and remember what it sounded like
>He doesn't record his music by writing down the data in binary code on a piece of paper
Leave this place.
>record in flac
>people listen to your music in mp3
For what purpose?
>>53855461
I'm a recording engineer. I prefer to record at 96KHz since it's easier to manager latency with my interface
>he doesn't record his music at 1Kbps then code a GUI in visual basic to automatically transcode it to FLAC on-the-fly for virtually no storage consumption while still having perfect quality
DUDE
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>recording human voices
You will never record fluently, you will always have some kind of loss from human voice box to analog and then to digital conversion, 3 conversions, on top of having 3rd parties convert your media for consumer outlets, ie Pandora/YouTube/Sound Cloud, and then relying on the consumers shitty DAC and headphones to deliver your music, only to be broken up even further by data Throttling because the consumer choose to stream your music.
>>53855665
>He doesn't record his music by drawing the analog waveform
Seriously though is there any reason to go higher than 44.1kHz/24 bit?
>>53855628
a true quality post in a sea of shit
>Being an OCD beta cuck
>>53855851
its not that likely your equipment supports much more. for the common person its just masturbatory to claim to hear beyond 40khz
>>53856460
Only if you're an audiophile
>he actually records his music
>>53855678
>record in flac
>not wav
>>53855461
>>53860010
>>53855678
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD621f7wbt8
