[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
It's almost April! Pascal is almost here! Hope you have
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 25
Thread images: 6
File: drakenvidiaintelamd.webm (3 MB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
drakenvidiaintelamd.webm
3 MB, 1280x720
It's almost April! Pascal is almost here! Hope you have enough money saved up to buy Pascal ASAP
>>
File: N.jpg (45 KB, 766x460) Image search: [Google]
N.jpg
45 KB, 766x460
>Nvidia
>>
>>53790198
I cant even if I wanted too. Doubt there is hackintosh support for new cars yet.
>>
>>53790198
I'm gonna wait for Polaris. In the off chance that amd releases a better gpu, I don't want to feel stupid for giving into buyer's hype instead of waiting a few months.
>>
>>53793213
When has AMD ever released a better gpu? Even if AMD makes better hardware nvidia will jew out and pay companies to develop in ways that benefits nvidia.

>>53790198
I am going to buy the best pascal card but definitely not asap. Their top of the line cards wont come out until a few months after the first pascal card drops. Also never buy first generation hardware, wait for the bugs to get worked out and let other people burn their houses down first.
>>
>>53793348
I don't remember really, but I still don't wanna risk it. Plus, amd has to make it work this time. A ton of pressure is put on them, so I believe Polaris might be revolutionary (or it will just be your typical amd shit with like 9999999 cram, as they seem to do a lot).
>>
>>53793348
>When has AMD ever released a better gpu?
7970/290/390
>>
>>53790198

whats the point? I have to wait another extra few months for them to release a TI card.
>>
>>53793213
in past 4 or so years. maybe you're right, on release nVidia is usually better.
In the whole history? Fuckton of times
>>53793213
It won't be better, they already said they will go for that sweet price\perf bux. So they will be cheaper, but the top place in all benchmarks will be occupied by nVidia.
>>
Over 1000 european rupees are being deposited to my account in a week but my R9 390 is literally stuck on the board, I need to figure how to break it off without damaging the board
>>
>>53793348
>When has AMD ever released a better gpu?
R580 and Tahiti would be the prime examples. As far as longevity is concerned I think Tahiti is the greatest GPU since G80/G92. It was a bit slower than GK104 at first but thanks to driver optimizations it now blows it the fuck out of the water; GK104 is completely irrelevant while the 7970 GHz Edition is now considerably closer to the GTX 780 than to the GTX 680 in performance.

RV770 wrecked NVIDIA on price and efficiency and RV870 had a massive time advantage on top of both of those.

Hawaii ended up squeaking just past GK110 at stock once later driver revisions came out but GK110 is a strong enough overclocker to be able to make up for that; OC vs OC the 780 Ti will beat the 290X/390X most of the time.

Fiji came a few percent short of truly competing with GM200, especially considering the difference in overclock potential between the two, but there's no reason to think AMD can't pull off beating NVIDIA again. It's not like the CPU game where they're legitimately fucked.
>>
File: 1446049036086.jpg (49 KB, 469x432) Image search: [Google]
1446049036086.jpg
49 KB, 469x432
>>53790198
>buying a 1080
>nvidia releases 1080ti after the dust settles
>then buying a 1080ti
you nVidiafags never cease to amuse me
>>
>>53793864
maybe he just wants to buy the midrange card and be done with it? there's nothing wrong with that.
>>
>>53793912
Now those guys are respectable.
>>
I have clear expectations of the new AMD cards.

The Fiji series is a clear failure of AMD, for many reasons.

I expect soon a card to be released that is atleast as fast as the R9 390 paired with the power consumption of a GTX 960.
>>
>>53790198
I was gonna buy this or polaris. But muhhh fucking Canadian dollar. And honestly i haven't played anything remotely taxing since GTA V and can't think of anything coming out. Current rig is fine for rendering too.
>>
>>53793950
Who gives a flying fuck about power consumption? Shit better be faster than fury X or idc
>>
>>53793820
i honestly wouldn't say they are fucked for cpu, but we wont know for a while, as all that is out is vague shit.
>>
>>53794068
They are fucked because intel has their own fab and amd is dependent on Global Foundries. I honestly think AMD as per usual could come up with some crafty shit to compete un a much lower budget but GF is holding them back immensely.
>>
>>53794046
No it won't you retard.

Vegas will replace the Fiji series.
They want to still get some money back for R&D.
There is no way the Polaris cards are gonna be faster.
>>
>>53794156
Both? If they refresh midrange they are gonna put new high end cards on the same architecture anon. Literally what they always did up until they started recycling tahiti over and over.
Especially considering nvidea is releasing a 1080 no way amd will sit with their thumbs up their ass with no high end 14nm card
>>
File: 1456693910896.jpg (97 KB, 472x514) Image search: [Google]
1456693910896.jpg
97 KB, 472x514
Quit dicking around and play The Way it's Meant to be Played.
>>
File: 1454634012630.png (415 KB, 496x349) Image search: [Google]
1454634012630.png
415 KB, 496x349
Don't care, I got my GPU last summer and used it when I needed it the most, not going through this shit again.
>>
File: 1455830848001.jpg (299 KB, 1366x768) Image search: [Google]
1455830848001.jpg
299 KB, 1366x768
>>53790198
Niggers
niggers everywhere
what a failing advertising campaign
burn niggers. oh please burn
>>
>>53794896
>he is so edgy
Thread replies: 25
Thread images: 6

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.