hosting

Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
hosting 2016-03-30 03:12:03Post No. 53761671
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

File: SSD-Cloud-Hosting.jpg (8KB, 457x219px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

8KB, 457x219px

hosting Anonymous 2016-03-30 03:12:03 Post No. 53761671 [Report]

Opinions in ssd hosting?
Provider suggestions?

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-30 03:13:16 Post No.53761686
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-30 03:13:16 Post No.53761686 [Report]

You'll just be bottlenecked by your connection anyway. Why SSD hosting?

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-30 03:16:39 Post No.53761732
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-30 03:16:39 Post No.53761732 [Report]

>>53761686
>Why SSD hosting?
i'm not sure which one to buy, i guess ssd hosting is better that a traditional disk ...
i'm making my own webpage for my business

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-30 04:19:27 Post No.53762423
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-03-30 04:19:27 Post No.53762423 [Report]

File: laughing batman.jpg (126KB, 1211x420px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

126KB, 1211x420px

>working inna datacenter
>provisioning a server
>4x1TB RAID10
>Hostname: cheapssdvps or something like that

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-30 04:34:37 Post No.53762570
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-30 04:34:37 Post No.53762570 [Report]

OVH
DigitalOcean

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-30 07:45:20 Post No.53764372
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-30 07:45:20 Post No.53764372 [Report]

Been using ramnode for two years, no problems.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-30 07:55:23 Post No.53764464
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-30 07:55:23 Post No.53764464 [Report]

SSD is unnecessary in my opinion. Also on webpages you won't see any difference to casual HDDs anyways.