>Radeon R9 280X
>have two monitors of different resolution
>install Linux
>install AMD proprietary driver for Linux (fglrx)
>fglrx decides that the two monitors are the same resolution
>everything looks stretched out on one monitor
>there is no way to specify you have different resolutions
Radeon is suffering.
>install Linux
Found the problem
>>53751803
>install linux
Sounds to me like Linux is suffering.
>using Linoox unironically
Sounds like a big company failure to me.
>using the proprietary drivers on amd
you fucked up
>>53751803
>amd linux
>fglrx
all your fault faggot
>>53751803
>Radeon is suffering.
Your brain is suffering.
>>53751876
This anon
Fglrx is ATI legacy software, amd doesn't ever care about Linux for desktop usage
>actually installed Linux
We got another one, boys!
>>53751803
>>install AMD proprietary driver for Linux (fglrx)
found your problem.
Run the free one.
It's almost as fast and actually works right.
>>53751969
>It's almost as fast
Nope.
R9 280X is 'radeon,' not 'amdgpu.'
It's slow as shit.
AMD drivers have been a bit sucky on linux for a while.
>>53752080
It isn't I'm running evergreen since radeon got born from ATI's corpse and it's the most hassle free GPU experience I ever had on linux.
>>53752186
Try running _any_ benchmark on it.
Then try the benchmark on fglrx.
>>53752386
I don't care about artificial performance, what counts is usability and doing what i want. Guess what, my mouse cursor doesn't lag behind dragging windows, my animations don't have micro stutter that makes them jarring, everything is as smooth as on windows. The only thing different is that firefox is even smoother than on any other operating system. Every game that i wanted to play runs just fine, provided it's an actual port or has good wine compatibility. WHAT more could one possibly want?
Protip: not everyone masturbates to rigged numbers on flawed benchmarks.