> make GPUs for Xbox One and Playstation 4
> 1.31 TFLOPS and 1.84 TFLOPS respectively
> Minimum GPU for VR is NVidia GTX 970 which is capable of 3.9 TFLOPS
> No mention of AMD equivalent capable of 3.9 TFLOPS
Get your shit together AMD. You are the hope of the VR generation.
>>53746376
There's plenty of AMD GPUs capable of 4TFLOPs
I'm sorry op but I recommend killing yourself immediately. Polaris 11 whichis the low-end card to-be is capable of 4k VR. It will usher in a new fascination and inclination for VR given thr cheap price and performance. Another innovation, checked.
>>53746376
>AMD Radeon Pro Duo
>16 TFLOPS
>Single most powerful graphics card ever created
>Designed purely for VR
>>53747439
you reek of shill faggot. Also, OP is talking CURRENT GEN, AS IN RIGHT FUCKING NOW. NOT AS IN THE INTANGIBLE FUTURE. Jesus Christ go back to /v/ or something.
>>53747439
>>53747466
samefaggot
>>53747469
>june
>intangible
Also, the 390x is mostly better than the 970 and also more vram. Clearly the website not mentioning any gpu card is doing the shilling, omitting any mention of capable AMD cards.
>>53747479
You kill yourself too.
>>53747469
>>>53747439
>you reek of shill faggot. Also, OP is talking CURRENT GEN, AS IN RIGHT FUCKING NOW. NOT AS IN THE INTANGIBLE FUTURE. Jesus Christ go back to /v/ or something.
The 380x manages 4 tflops without problem.
>>53747469
You mean like the Radeon Pro Due, the single most powerful graphics card every created and the only card of this generation able to do VR like it should actually be done, with 4K @ 120?
>>53747498
>You mean like the Radeon Pro Due, the single most powerful graphics card every created and the only card of this generation able to do VR like it should actually be done, with 4K @ 120?
gonna kek when that thing throttles so hard that a single OCed 980ti ends up blowing it away in most games, maybe nvidia will even bring out a dual GM200 card in response.
>>53747602
>throttles
Except for how it doesn't draw all that much more power than a fury x which runs cool as fuck.
>nvidia dual GM200
Yeah, it'd be hilarious to watch them launch another $3000 card in an attempt to catch up to AMD.
>>53747655
>Except for how it doesn't draw all that much more power than a fury x which runs cool as fuck.
temperature =/= power draw idiot, the fury x runs cool because it has a retarded overbuilt AIO mounted to it out of the box. it's still hot garbage that needs 300w for one GPU
>Yeah, it'd be hilarious to watch them launch another $3000 card in an attempt to catch up to AMD.
kek, it's AMD who needs to catch up. they've been behind for over a decade now.
>>53747772
>temperature =/= power draw
>>53747826
Best holmes
>>53747772
Meanwhile in your dreams.
>>53747439
low end polaris 11 will be able to run games at 4k 90+ fps? are you retarded?
>>53748104
Good ol' AMD, always overvolting the fuck out of their chips.
Probably because financial situation, Nvidia can afford to throw away chips over a certain voltage.
>>53748104
AMD is way, way too generous with their booting safety margins on CPUs and GPUs, the CPU side of things though its not always entirely their fault.
Kaveri/Godavari APUs only need 1.25v to hit stock clocks with room to spare, yet tons of mobos will default to 1.35v or even higher in some cases. Tons of Kaveri chips will actually boot and be stable at 3.5ghz with just 1.1v. 95w Kaveri APUs can run closer to 70w at stock clocks, and run at 100% CPU+GPU load with no throttling if you lower default voltages and disable GeAPM.
The cheaper the VRM phases on a board the more of a safety margin you need. This is completely ridiculous as more voltage makes the VRM hotter and exacerbates throttling issues which kill performance. Manufacturers should never cheap out on power phases and filtering, and AMD needs to stop voluntarily sacrificing a huge chunk of perf/watt.
>>53748104
>still more power hungry than Nvidia
>needs magic rituals and hacks to lower the housefires
>>53746376
R9 380x does 3.97 TFLOPS. For ~$100 less than the GTX 970. The R9 390 does 5.12 TFLOPS for about the same price as a 970.
>>53748261
Fiji PRO is faster than GM204, it should be more power hungry.
Moving the powertune slider? Magic rituals?
You green drones are even dumber than I thought, it takes less effort to move a slider than your shitpost.
>>53748261
AMD uses 90% of the energy that is converted to performance and 10% of it is transfered to heat. It's vice versa on noVidya.
>>53748319
You're possibly dumber than the faggot you're quoting.
>>53748104
Undervolting is just like overclocking, it's not guaranteed and shouldn't be included in the rating. Besides, even in best case scenario, it's 20W more for similar performance.
>>53748354
>shouldn't be included in the rating.
Oh yes it should, it's a notable aspect of the GPU and the only ones who don't care for either are fucking normalfags and they have no bearings on these discussions.
>>53748467
It's a huge variable still. You could always get a card that doesn't undervolt or overclock for shit and stuck with it or have to waste time replacing it.
Good overclocking or undervolting is a huge plus but too individual to count when rating a card.
>>53748510
Every card will have a certain OC and UV headroom, maybe not +300 core MHz and -80mV like the golden samples, but with proper VRMs it should be possible to get close enough.
A good amount of either puts the card in a different light entirely, either raising perf/watt dramatically or increasing maximum performance, depends on what you prefer.
They should always be included.
>>53746376
My R9 390X manages 5.9TFLOPS and costs slightly less than a GTX 970 in Europe.
>>53748536
Heads up to anyone who cares: the 390X UVs and OCs worth shit. Then again this was expected from the get-go.
>>53748536
>They should always be included.
Maybe after excessive testing of tons of cards, and even then there is still a chance to pick a shitty one.
I am expecting something great from AMD actually.
A card that is atleast as fast as the R9 390 with the power consumption of a GTX 960.
They better deliver.
>>53748561
You sure? Here's Hawaii running at 190W
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firepro-w8100-workstation-graphics-card,3868-15.html
Anyone else start a nuclear reactor with their FX cpu?
>>53748354
>Undervolting is just like overclocking, it's not guaranteed and shouldn't be included in the rating.
undervolting and overclocking both are always guaranteed by some margin, there are no CPUs or GPUs you can buy today that will not magically not OC at all while some get a >50% OC. the silicon lottery has always been about who can get the best OC past that guaranteed margin, not if it you can get any OC at all.
>>53748585
>http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firepro-w8100-workstation-graphics-card,3868-15.html
kek, underclocked out of the box and still draws 300w. get your shit together AMD, this is embarassing.
>>53748585
is it possible to cherry pick any harder? those cards cost $2500 and have 150mhz lower core clocks than the 390s.
here's what consumer hawaii cards power draw will be like.
>>53749563
>Rendering and compute workloads can’t really be teased apart completely, since so many of today's tasks are mixed. The FirePro W8100’s 188.4 W measurement is good, especially since it almost matches the Quadro K6000’s 188.7 W.
That's almost 120W less than a stock Hawaii for
176MHz smaller core clock
