Because no consumer downloads (or would be allocated the bandwidth) at 1 gigabyte per second.

>>53692580
because 1MB = 8Mb

nice try though

bandwidth != latency, that's why retard

>>53692580
>At Cebit 2009
Most of /g was too young to remember this.

>>53692580
Because there is no cloud, only other people's computers.

>>53692594
--verbose please.

>>53692580
>lower write speads than read
Has to be a shitty SSD when the PCIe gen2 x8 link is not the bottleneck.

>>53692611
8 bits = 1 byte

1 Gigabit per second = 125 megabytes per second

Basically about as fast as your hard drives in RAID.

This SSD is about 5x faster.

>>53692619
Yeah it's probably a limit of the controller or nand cells themselves, either the links to the controller are not very wide or saturated with chips, or the controller just doesn't have enough gofast.

https://www.google.com/search?q=1+gigabit+to+megabyte&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

>>53692619
>>53692679
Read speeds are always better than write

>>53692719
how does this pertain to any of the posts you linked?

>>53692679
And that's why the op is right when he blames 1gbps (100MB) down 1 gbps (100MB) up connections of ssd owners. Cannot saturate that ssd bandwidth... no? Of course i assume that 1gbs to be a typo though.

>>53692730
The dude originally pointed out "lower write speeds than read" like it was something of note.

Seriously, is slow internet a bottleneck to ssd speeds?

>>53692886
Yes

>>53692886
No

>>53692580
>Cloud
>Distributed system
>A distributed system is one where the failure of a computer you didn't even know existed renders your own computer inoperable
No thanks

>>53692886
Maybe

>>53692886
I don't know

>>53692580
>2009
That was 7 years ago. Now PCIe ssds are able to get the same or better speeds than gigabit connection.

>Write to the cloud
>Write through your network interface, across many others, finally landing in another computer's ethernet port, and into a que of writes to its own hard drive
>which is that same SSD

That's why