>Some tech and gaming companies have left behind a shameful history of objectifying women in major promotional venues, but Microsoft's behavior at the 2016 Game Developers Conference this week was a surprising reversal of progress. Attendees of Microsoft's GDC party were greeted by women dancing on platforms — a choice made not by the venue but by Microsoft.
http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/18/11262888/microsoft-gdc-2016-party
>>53638281
Have they never been to a single bar in their life?
>>53638281
quantum break runs at 720p
>Objectifying women.
Again with the sex negative feminism's cancerous vitriol.
Why don't they come out and say that Bisexuals are the only acceptable collective within the LGBT,
and that Gays, Lesbians, and arguable Transgenders,
are all bigoted objectifying filth because their romantic and sexual interest is primarily defined by the opposite party's sex (exterior), and only secondarily defined by their personality? Bigoted as in being of closed mind.
Can these sex negative feminists be any more different than born again churches going full retard and conservative soccer mommies?
I bet 10 minutes from now, Verge is gonna make an article deriding religion despite this very article being the definition of religious moralism which would garner all the support from Christian Conservatives possible.
>the verge
I don't even know why i'm wasting my time replying. That site is as cancerous as GAWKER.
>>53638281
Hiring hostesses is now a crime?
Have anyone at "the Verge" (or whoever wrote this piece of click bait shit) ever been to any industry fair? Why are video james targeted here?
Why do I even care?
>>53638383
Good thing Gawker will soon be gone eh anon?
I just don't get it. Where did it all go so wrong? Why do people try so hard to make themselves into victims? Why is everything suddenly so offensive to everyone?
>>53638281
>men like to look at attractive women by nature
>dancers like to show off body and dancing skills and make some money in the process
>ugly fat feminists walk in and straight away get triggered by seeing attractive women getting all the attention 'This cannot stand'
>proceed to whine and bitch about how women are being sexualy objectified
>forget to even ask if the women dancing on the platforms had any problems with being there
What else is new
>>53638318
Bahahahah
No.
>>53638281
Based fucking Microsoft
>>53638521
>implying women dancers being subjected to internalized and institutionalized sexism even realise they are being used by men to sate their most primal urges
Your make me sick!
>>53638510
People are intellectually lazy now. If they fain offense then they get to feel superior to the target without actually doing any of the thinking necessary to win an argument.
>>53638708
TRIGGERED
RIGGEREDT
IGGEREDTR
GGEREDTRI
GEREDTRIG
EREDTRIGG
REDTRIGGE
EDTRIGGER
DTRIGGERE
>>53638708
If fucking fat feminists know about it, everyone does.
>girls want to feels empowered
>girl finds herself attractive and wants people to look at her body that she workout at the gym for hours
>willing to dance in skimpy clothes because she loves it
>no sex involved
>ugly feminist get angry that people are sexualizing the girl dancing
>that's her job to dance and she loves it
>they slut shame her by saying it's wrong
feminist sure has some weird double standards.
>>53638708
Talk to strippers.
Many of them enjoy the power they have over men. They shake around a bit and make shittons of money.
Shit, as a guy I'd gladly be a stripper if I weren't afraid of gay men stalking me or trying to rape me.
>>53638476
>implying Jews won't save Gawker to continue the brainwash
•∆
∆∆
>>53638281
>Linking directly to the article instead of an archive
This is the reason why "the verge" is still a thing.
>>53638850
rape is not a big deal, it looks dangerous only because woman make it look like it. someone puts a penis in you for few minutes, no big deal
>>53638901
Not my thing, if you like it maybe you should go stripping though. Apparently gay men pay well.
>>53638281
Who cares?
>>53638281
Fuck, why did IoS go the sjw way.
He looked like a smart fella.
Shit.
![4226995-tomb-raider-underworld[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/4jFk3Z9.jpg "4226995-tomb-raider-underworld[1].jpg")
>>53638281
> >Some tech and gaming companies have left behind a shameful history of objectifying women
No wai.
>>53638281
Video game characters are not real women. Women should just fuck off to do their own things if they can't handle sexy video game characters. Video games are not made for women in general. They are not the target audience.
>>53639517
sexy female characters = bad
sexy male characters = good
captcha: dr dante
... huh
>>53639633
every fucking time
>>53640223
any man can get he-man big though
just need to be willing to put in the work
and the roids
>>53640223
>>53639633
>objectification of women for the pleasure of men
>men power fantasies
How hard is to understand that?
>>53640253
And any girl can be barbie like, or, let's just say good looking, with the correct diet and work out.
And in some cases plastic surgery
>>53640262
Ah yes, men do love jerking off to barbie.
Git fukt, you retarded shitcunt.
>>53640275
guess if we include plastic surgery in the argument things even up
>>53638281
Who gives a fucking shit.
Oh people like attractive women. Oh no.
Fuck off already. I thought we were finally learning to ignore these perpetual victims.
>>53640290
it was to even up the roids
I mean, I'm not saying one is better than the other, just that they are the exact same thing and sperging on one and not on the other is a ridicoulus double standard.
>>53640312
>it was to even up the roids
i disagree, a below average male can go to above average by just getting a better body
a below average girl is pretty fucked as the "ideal" girl body is a pretty inactive one in the first place
>>53640262
are you seriously saying that women get no pleasure from sexy male characters?
and even that was the case, are you instead saying that because women don't like it, men aren't allowed to like it?
did you even read what you wrote?
Women object to you looking at other women in their presence. You should be giving these women attention not them women.
>>53638867
dont they have to pay like 100 million dollars? doubt thats worth it for a site full of hipster fucks
>>53638383
hit the nail on the head.
>>53638476
I really hope kotaku and their other trash dies too
>shaming women for CHOOSING to take control of their sexuality and make money dancing
Disgusting, desu. Microsoft employed a dozen sex-free women who wanted to express themselves how they saw fit, and bigot feminists apparently think women's sexuality is something that should be shamed and hidden.
It's like I'm really on /v/
The article is amusing. Essentially, these womyn see a scantily clad womyn getting paid to look hot, and they feel unwelcomed? How bad is their own image that this triggers them?
>>53638281
I'm triggered that Verge assumed these dancers were women.
Can we stop with the gender labeling?
>>53640881
top kek
>>53638281
This just restored a tiny bit of faith in Microsoft for me but they have a long way to go
>>53638281
Bump
