>>53633970
Protonmail's entire security model relies on you trusting that the Protonmail wouldn't serve tampered JavaScript that provides them with your decrypted private key upon entering your passphrase, either due to a server compromise, employee gone rogue or due to an interception warrant. In-browser crypto is a meme. Just use PGP.

>>53634279
What is PGP? Look, I am looking for e-mail clients like gmail, lycos and such but once read a thread here about some new ones but not as casual known like the ones I mentioned. I do feel the need to migrate to newer clients.

Do you actually mean email CLIENTs or an email hosting service? There's a difference.

>>53634363
Fine, clients. Yes I have no idea on the differences. Wish I could get the (you) so you can see I am OP and >>53634331

Or should I ask somewhere else?

>>53634567
For God's sake, dude. If you have no concept of how this entire e-mail thingie works, you don't need anything "not so casual". You're as casual as they get.

File: 1438152446776.jpg (12 KB, 250x250) Image search: [Google]

12 KB, 250x250

>trusting anything that says "secure" in that context
>trusting anything that says "encrypted" in that context
>not remembering hushmail proposed the same thing but sold out to feds
>not reading the privacy policy
>not reading reviews from all sources you can search for after reading the privacy policy
>not knowing what pgp is or how to use it

>>53634748
also
>not reading /g/ archives for relevant threads
please stop making reposts
>not making sure that server and all servers used by protonmail are actually located in switzerland
"secure" whatnot in "switzerland" is literally a meme its used so often and often bad things come from those services advertised in similar context

Cock.li

>>53633970
>doesn't know pgp
>doesn't know client/service
>>53634567
Use Gmail