>>53589699
everything at the application level has to be programmed, meaning that someone has control over the rules.

what do you think?

>>53589721
I think they are probably rigged, but I'd like some kind of proof

>>53589699
There is no need to rig them, they make such an insane amount off of rake that trying to cheat people would not make any sense.

>>53589772
I don't like to underestimate peoples greed

>>53589789
If the site plans to be open for longer than a year they would be much better served offering a solid product.

The only confirmed reports I have heard of poker sites cheating was where a single rogue developer/admin puts a backdoor into a release that allows them to gain an edge.

Other than that there are some fly by night sites you should avoid, stick with sites that have a long standing reputation.