>$650
>needs special external graphics card connected using Thunderbolt 3
why
>>53589018
>company develops product
>charges money to pay for development costs
Also
>needs special
>Intel literally supports AMD XConnect which standardizes the external GPU interface
>>53589018
what is it?
>>53589018
It doesn't need it. Not everyone uses a PC for gaymen
>>53589491
A NUC with one of the higher end quad core CPU's that has Iris Pro graphics. Intel is going to be huge with this. Consoles are on suicide watch and Intel will finally push AMD out and then the real product development can begin.
>>53589558
>then the real product development can begin.
You mean the tripling of prices and slowing of major development?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=economics+101
>>53589018
Because it's a good product.
If you don't have the space for a fucking Desktop you might have space for ta NUC.
I have the old Haswell NUC and it's peachy the moment Ill be having some gayman fun.
>>53589584
>You mean the tripling of prices and slowing of major development?
It would take off. Intel wouldn't have to focus on beating AMD. It would be better for the industry as a whole for Intel to be the sole supplier. Less choice is better because stuff is more optimized and faster.
>>53589685
That is some weak bait you are serving there.
