32 MORE CORES

Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 4

Anonymous
32 MORE CORES 2016-03-17 20:53:32Post No. 53542355
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

File: drakehatesAMD.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

3MB, 1280x720px

32 MORE CORES Anonymous 2016-03-17 20:53:32 Post No. 53542355 [Report]

AMD can't keep getting away with it!

AMD Working on Monstrous Opteron Processor with 32 Zen x86 High Performance Cores

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-17 20:54:01 Post No.53542364
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-17 20:54:01 Post No.53542364 [Report]

http://wccftech.com/amd-monsterous-opteron-processor-32-zen-x86-cores/

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-17 20:57:00 Post No.53542398
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-17 20:57:00 Post No.53542398 [Report]

>>53542355
>>53542364
>http://wccftech.com/amd-monsterous-opteron-processor-32-zen-x86-cores/
>11 months ago...

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:03:53 Post No.53544230
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:03:53 Post No.53544230 [Report]

Holy shit 9000000000000w

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:09:41 Post No.53544301
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:09:41 Post No.53544301 [Report]

>>53544230
Can I pair this with dual Radeon Pro Duos?

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:12:57 Post No.53544328
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:12:57 Post No.53544328 [Report]

>>53544301
Hiroshima 2

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:47:30 Post No.53544751
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:47:30 Post No.53544751 [Report]

>>53544328
Nuclear Fusion level

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:51:34 Post No.53544803
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:51:34 Post No.53544803 [Report]

File: 1433031639415.jpg (43KB, 556x561px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

43KB, 556x561px

>>53542364
>The next generation Opteron processor has eight DDR4 memory channels capable of handling 256GB per channel.

Jesus christ!

Now actually bring down the cost of memory and that'd support a hell of a lot of VMs.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:54:27 Post No.53544835
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-03-17 23:54:27 Post No.53544835 [Report]

File: 64503_o.gif (641KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

641KB, 320x240px

MORE CORES

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-18 00:06:37 Post No.53545015
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-18 00:06:37 Post No.53545015 [Report]

>>53544835

The meme lives on

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-18 00:21:05 Post No.53545216
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-18 00:21:05 Post No.53545216 [Report]

>>53542364
>Each core will have 512KB of L2 cache and 4 cores will share 8MB worth of L3 cache.
I wonder how much would it cost to buy something that has 16 MB L2 cache and 64 MB of L3 cache

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-18 00:27:37 Post No.53545281
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-18 00:27:37 Post No.53545281 [Report]

>>53542355
They are meant for servers you fucktard, Intel does the same with Xeons.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-18 00:29:17 Post No.53545301
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-03-18 00:29:17 Post No.53545301 [Report]

File: amd stratedgy.png (224KB, 778x960px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

224KB, 778x960px

>>53542355
You can never have too many cores, anon.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-18 00:31:40 Post No.53545331
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-18 00:31:40 Post No.53545331 [Report]

>>53542364
>poo in the loo tech

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-18 01:21:48 Post No.53545882
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-18 01:21:48 Post No.53545882 [Report]

>>53544803
Their bandwidth isn't anything to scoff at either. 8 channels supporting up to 2800mhz DDR4. Hopefully they used an internally developed IMC that can scale instead of another off the shelf shit heap from Cadence. Though for enterprise its going to take a while for ECC modules to start reaching the insane clocks.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-18 01:25:01 Post No.53545911
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-18 01:25:01 Post No.53545911 [Report]

>>53542355
More cores for more whores.