So what kind of power supply is needed for this? 1kW?
>>53500884
A nuclear power plant
>525W TDP
AMD HOUSEFIRES
AMD HOUSEFIRES EVERYWHERE
>>53500884
Whats the price?
"AMD has announced that the card will retail for $1499"
Never mind.
>>53500901
1500 US Dollars
>>53500932
looks like a decent stock image
>these comments
I seriously thought I was on /v/
It's pretty embarrassing that this was shown as a flagship card. Fastest if the game has a working crossfire profile and beaten by cards half is price if it doesn't. Hell some games will never work in multi gpu because of their engine others because the Dev never implemented it and it's an edge case scenario. The price is atrocious and the power usage just highlights that amd hasn't had much fabrication improvement since 2013.
>>53500884
So is that legit 8gb or 8gm in crossfire
>>53501976
Obviously the latter. HBM1 can't have more than 4GB per chip.
>>53500884
10 kW videocards when?
>>53500884
375W?
You should not buy it, wait for the next generation.
Holy fucking shit this site is cancer.
What is so hard to said the real TDP and price.
No wonder /sci/ always talk shit about this board.
>Testing conducted by AMD Performance Labs as of March 7, 2016 on the AMD Radeon™ Pro Duo, AMD Radeon™ R9 295X2 and Nvidia’s Titan Z, all dual GPU cards, on a test system comprising Intel i7 5960X CPU, 16GB memory, Nvidia driver 361.91, AMD driver 15.301 and Windows 10 using 3DMark Fire Strike benchmark test to simulate GPU performance. PC Manufacturers may vary configurations, yielding different results. At 1080p, 1440p, and 2160P, AMD Radeon™ R9 295X2 scored 16717, 9250, and 5121, respectively; Titan Z scored 14945, 7740, and 4099, respectively; and AMD Radeon™ Pro Duo scored 20150, 11466, and 6211, respectively, outperforming both AMD Radeon™ R9 295X2 and Titan Z. RPD-1
AMD is now literally testing their GPUs with Intel CPUs. How embarrassing is this?
>>53502172
Because faildozer failed, and zen is still kept secret.
>>53502172
Baha well it is a real world scenario. I bought second hand 290x (and i4790) because it's fast and good value, an amd cpu would have crippled it. Now imagine how bottlenecked this thing would have been
>>53502153
>No wonder /sci/ always talk shit about this board.
when /sci/ was created there was an exodus, all the smart people from /g/ left.
>>53502153
Don't need any of that to get all the (You)s here
>>53500884
>captcha: 2200w snorth
>>53502294
why did they drop the X4 and X6 series?
>>53502172
At least they admit their CPUs are shit. Just like Intel with their P4s.
>>53500932
295x2 was also 1500$ when it came out. The price will drop over time.
And yeah, probably a 700-800w psu will be required, maybe 1k to be on the safe side.
>>53501938
This isn't a flagship, its an enthusiast, professional tier. Imagine working on your GPU system a dual Radeon Pro Dual. This literally oozes professional grade multimedia work or scientific calcs.
Their flagship is still Fury X.
>>53503212
>This literally oozes professional grade multimedia work or scientific calcs.
That's a cool name for western AAA game
>>53503212
Better tell their marketing department that
>>53501938
Wait this counts as crossfire?
>>53503363
Yeah two chips on the one board is always multi gpu, in this case amd crossfire. It doesn't matter if it's got stacked memory or not, the game still has to support multi gpu
>>53502153
>Holy fucking shit this site is cancer.
What is so hard to said the real TDP and price.
because google is a shortcut away and you're asking people to do your homework
>>53503311
At the risk of overusing this yet again, fuck off back to /v/
>>53503679
300W TDP, price is $1499
3 PCIe 8pin + PCIe slot = 525W max power draw on reference PCB
>>53504116
But I'm not from /v/, the graphic card is for gayms though
