Should I install Arch Linux Normally or with Architect
We need to know more about you to answer that
>>53481894
What.
architect is much easier
normally you can customize it more
>>53482083
okie
>>53481883
>silver
not even once
>>53481883
Not OP, what about Antergos?
>>53482143
>no offline installer option
kek
>>53481883
install normally if you can read wikis
with Architect if you are underage
>>53482161
I could use wikis, thing is i will have to remember or write down all of those command lines, it's kind of stressing
>>53482187
Do you not have a smartphone?
>>53482199
nope, no phone.
>>53482161
Is there a difference or obvious benefit by installing manually?
>>53482213
from what I understood, installing manually gives you a lot more options for costumization.
therefore, if you want something 'basic' architect is the way to go;
>>53482213
i haven't tried installing with architect, but installing arch is really not that complicated.
there is a file install.txt that you can read in root's home dir without going to the wiki and have the essential commands.
if networking doesn't work after you install , reboot and chroot into your system,
install lynx and browse to the wiki and bits by bits set up and fix your installation.
>>53482159
I just installed it an I'm 90% sure you could install it offline if you need toand you want to use GNOME :^)
>>53482209
Sucks
Just write down the commands I guess? Or use architect. It's not like it really matters how as long as it works
>>53481883
Architect so you dont have to fuck around with X
>>53481883
Yes.
>>53481883
Install Gentoo
>>53482187
Install in a VM first and write everything down that you do in a successful install because it's very likely that you'll fuck up somewhere in your install the first time
>>53482161
underage are the kids who install arch
