>0.99 >0.100
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
>0.99
>0.100
Yes that's how versioning is supposed to work
What's the problem?
Yes anon. The point values are completely separate from one another.
after 0.9 comes 0.10
after 0.99 comes 0.100
100 follows 99, what's your point?
>>53463364
.100 (1/10th or 10/100th) does not follow .99 (99/100th)
>>53463422
>he's never seen version numbers
What number do you think 2.0.4 is?
>>53463422
Well then it's a good thing we're talking about versioning and not math. What do you propose they should do instead? 0.991?
While I would like to have a standardized way of showing version numbers, but it is up to the project how this is done.
The . doesn't signify a decimal point. a lot of projects have several tiers of updates and the numbers signify that
Wait how do you get 0.100, still on .99
>>53463422
>>53463472
it's not a number
it's
number1.number2.number3.....
they're all separate
usually
bigRevision.smallRevision.bugFix
0.100 means there have been 100 small revisions.
>>53463422
>>53463472
>>53463422
major.minor.patch
>>53463809
You. I like you.
You are confusing yourself
>>53463439
version 2, release candidate 4
>>53463809
I miss those pics and those deformed trollfaces as the last sign of life of the trollface meme, giving way to the bait meme.
>>53463422
they're two seperate numbers
major.minor
>>53464138
I miss them too, some of them were simply deformed trollfaces with a synonymous of the word trolled like "troublered?" and some others were really, really elaborated pieces of text.
why don't they move up to 1.0 ffs?
>>53464776
Because freetard software is always beta software, newfag.
Don't you get it?
Whilst the freetards are fixing their arch installations, the rest of us are getting paid at our jobs because we work with real software!
>>53463297
version numbers rarely follow decimal logic
