How'd I do?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
How'd I do?
>he bought an SSD that isn't a Samsung or Intel
top maymay m8
>Windows 10
Bad
>>52920067
>Buying windows
top kek
>>52920067
.>falling for the solid state jew
>>52920067
Insert directly to rectum
>>52920067
i'm rocking one in my t420 runs pretty damn well
supposedly better than the samsung drives and on par with intel
>>52920083
Ignore him
>you did good
>>52920067
>Buying Windows
lol
>SanDisk SSD
Hope it last for you.
>Windows 10 under the SSD
>implying this isn't a bait thread
Nice try, faggot.
>>52920067
you didn't get that free as a student nigga?
>>52920131
Buying the software that I use every day is a bad thing? Well golly! Now I know!
>>52920067
How much for the SSD, op?
>>52920067
>Windows 10
>>52920067
>not NVMe
what's the point
>>52920403
$133.99
>>52920497
pritty gud
>Windows 10
Where did it all go so wrong anon?
A slightly unrelated question:
Is it "okay" to get a 1TB SSD and replace a built-in hdd in my laptop?
It's powerful, but hdd's slow as fuck, so I'm dying a bit inside
What are the best high capacity ssd 2,5" ?
<3
>paying for the botnet 10
lmao-ing at your life
>>52920497
you lucky sun of a gun
>>52920083
Sandisk is fine
>>52920596
nice ramdisk
>windows 10
nigga, is you serious?
>>52920596
Awful score for a ramdisk
>>52920626
cool
>windows 10
>>52920655
Stop buying chinese cheapos
>>52920655
>sata 6gbps is 600mb/s
>you're getting 3000mb/s
Use your fucking brain m8
>>52920596
Do you have RAPID mode enabled in the Magician?
>>52920692
>sata 6BG/s is 600MB/s
...
>>52920067
Got the same SSD for 80 USD on sale. Try harder.
>>52920596
>>52920603
>>52920655
Samsung Magician's RAPID mode is cool shit
It's like RAM caching IIRC
>>52920710
SATA 3, the most common one, is 6Gbps, which means 600MB/s, not 6GB/s. Gb != GB
Fuck off back to rebbit already, you clueless faggot.
>>52920710
It's true. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA#SATA_revision_3.0_.286_Gbit.2Fs.2C_600_MB.2Fs.29
rekt --> >>52920596
To get this you either have a pcie SSD which you don't, or a ramdisk. I wonder which one a broke NEET would have.
>>52920958
tfw no RAPID for my 950
>>52920958
Except that Windows already does caching. The only purpose of RAPID is to cheat the benchmark.
sandisk is the last remaining major brand in SSD business that did not have some fuckup
...but you took their TLC drive, which is kinda meh
hope it was cheap
>>52921067
No one takes the results seriously anyways. The only purpose is to annoy people like us when clueless faggot brags about it.
>>52921131
Please don't be so jelly of my results, pleb
>>52921141
I get twice that score lol
>>52921168
>
>>52921168
here, gets shit on
encoding atm so the score is lower than regular
>>52921291
nice ramdisk.
>>52921412
i only have 8gb of ram :^)
dont be jelly of my ssd poorfag
>>52921449
I feel like we're repeating things somehow...
Sata III has a lower max speed than your benchmarks though
>2016
>Not using m.2
>>52920083
>Samsung
kek
>>52920087
yup
>>52921547
>implying the 850 Evo/Pro aren't GOAT SSDs
At the top, right alongside Intel SSDs
OP here
That's the fastest Windows installation I've ever seen! This thing boots in less than three god damned seconds!
HOLY SHIT
What's a good program that will let me test this thing? Something like a GPU benchmark but for Solid State Drives?
>>52921562
CrystalDiskMark
>>52921291
>that 8gb ssd
>>52920111
>500 write on a 512gb
>better than samsung
pretty sure that even a 250gb evo beats that, and 100% sure about my 850 pro.
>>52920586
If you have the money, why not?
>>52921571
shizuku edition
If I'm playing with an SSD now, can I let steam download games while I play Fallout 4 without any performance loss? On my old drive, playing a game and downloading large files slowed everything to a crawl.
>>52922306
this
>>52920067
>WInodws shill in disguise
Gee, rajesh. You must be really desperate for your 5 rupees.
>>52920067
Not bad, pending price. I bought a pair of the same ones for $99 USD during the holidays. They work fine.
>>52920067
fucked up
>>52920067
if you spent over $120, you did bad.
>>52924112
overpaid, in reality $100-110 is the highest you should be buying
Looking at this or Evo 850 for £105 and £125 respectively. Don't know which one to get
>>52920083
I have (had) intel (535 x2), samsung (840 evo x1), crucial (not sure x2), sandisk (ultra II x2) & kingston (v300 x4) ssds. The 2 crucials burst into flames, and the kingstons are slow. The Intels are awesome but not the best price/performance ratio, and both samsung and the sandisks are great.
>>52920481
performance that is greater than a spinning disk but not greater than sata 3 bus speed?
>>52920067
you did good son, you did good. *pat on the back
>>52920094
linux is shit. dont even say mac os
>>52924169
adata was already selling 480 gig ssd's for 110 a while back, sandisk is behind the curve.
>adata
it just werks
