>tails 2.0 >gnome dropped

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-01-27 00:33:18 Post No. 52641164
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: tailsgnome.png (53 KB, 732x605) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-01-27 00:33:18 Post No. 52641164 [Report]

>tails 2.0
>gnome
dropped

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-27 00:37:33 Post No.52641244
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-27 00:37:33 Post No.52641244 [Report]

>>52641164
but why?

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-27 00:47:14 Post No.52641408
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-27 00:47:14 Post No.52641408 [Report]

OK arch kiddie

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-27 01:19:16 Post No.52641944
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-27 01:19:16 Post No.52641944 [Report]

>>52641164
whonix here i come

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-27 02:02:12 Post No.52642682
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-27 02:02:12 Post No.52642682 [Report]

>>52641164
>gnome in classic mode
I can only assume this is the same as fallback mode, which is similiar to gnome 2 which was goat

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-27 02:05:34 Post No.52642738
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-27 02:05:34 Post No.52642738 [Report]

Didn't tails always use GNOME, only in non-shit mode?

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-27 02:08:20 Post No.52642782
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-27 02:08:20 Post No.52642782 [Report]

>>52642738
Yes. OP is just memeing it up

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-27 02:11:40 Post No.52642837
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-27 02:11:40 Post No.52642837 [Report]

>>52641244
are they supposed to stay on debian 7 forever

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-27 02:17:29 Post No.52642934
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-27 02:17:29 Post No.52642934 [Report]

Who gives a shit it's practically a one application OS.