>2016 >filesystems still have to manually count the number

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-01-26 14:07:08 Post No. 52631991
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: properties.png (24 KB, 450x371) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-01-26 14:07:08 Post No. 52631991 [Report]

>2016
>filesystems still have to manually count the number of items inside (takes forever when you have a million files)
>each file doesn't get given a UUID making it easy to detect changes when syncing files
>no duplication support (all files with the same checksum use only the same space)

Why haven't filesystems changed much in decades?

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-26 14:10:18 Post No.52632015
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-26 14:10:18 Post No.52632015 [Report]

Try ZFS.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-26 14:21:34 Post No.52632125
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-26 14:21:34 Post No.52632125 [Report]

>>52631991
Try btrfs or zfs

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-26 14:23:19 Post No.52632151
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-26 14:23:19 Post No.52632151 [Report]

>>52632125
>>52632015
I've heard those are prone to corruption easily.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-26 14:28:02 Post No.52632209
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-26 14:28:02 Post No.52632209 [Report]

>>52632151
btrfs is still in testing but is already stable for common use

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-26 14:44:27 Post No.52632403
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-26 14:44:27 Post No.52632403 [Report]

>>52632209
I'm not risking my JAV thank you very much.