Mirin Windows 10 font rendering?

File: Screenshot at 2016-01-20 23:11:39.png (358KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

358KB, 1280x800px

neh not ready.
I get better font rendering at a much smaller resolution

>>52532073
>looks at chrome tabs
gross font rendering.

>>52532073
KANKER

>>52532073
>open non windows 10 window in windows 10
>looks like complete blurry shit

gg no re

>>52532187
i know the word cancer in every single language
hello netherlands

File: cancer.png (423KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

423KB, 1920x1080px

>>52532073
But that's not even close to what it looks like by default. Chrome's font rendering looks like absolute shit by default in Windows.

File: 1443996799120.gif (10KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

10KB, 125x125px

>>52532198
prove it

>>52532206
nowotwór skurwysynu :D

File: takbir kurwa.jpg (79KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

79KB, 640x427px

>>52532216
rak

File: comparison.png (41KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

41KB, 1280x960px

>>52532073
>>52532175
did a side by side comparison, all fragments from both screenshots scaled 400%, no interpolation

notice the ō character in windows one.
Shits atrocious friend.

Firefox has the best font rendering on Windows. Chrome looks like shit.

File: 1413703924892.png (88KB, 666x474px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

88KB, 666x474px

>>52532408
>upscaling a screenshot of sub-pixel anti-aliasing
way to ruin the whole idea of it, you nigger

File: 1430700854475.jpg (39KB, 323x267px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

39KB, 323x267px

>>52532408
it's not even the same font

File: 2016-01-20-174740_1920x1080_scrot.png (507KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

507KB, 1920x1080px

Arch with custom fontconfig

>>52532590
then how are you suggesting to compare font rendering if most of us have different displays with different dpi?

>>52532408
The windows font is properly spaced unlike fedora's

DejaVu is shit and only good for really small resolutions since it has hardcore hinting instructions.

>>52532692
What's a good way to have Windows render like this?

>>52532817
I don't know much about windows, sorry

>>52532692
Genuinely disgusting.

openSUSE's default font rendering is as good as Linux fonts get.

>>52532908
can I have a pic please?

File: AeroShot.png (490KB, 1523x1376px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

490KB, 1523x1376px

>>52532073

>>52532908
also, my pixel order is RGB. If your monitor's pixel order is different, almost none of these pictures in the thread will look right

File: Tokyo.png (493KB, 1724x771px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

493KB, 1724x771px

Guess

>>52533015
>those blocky serif's in Tokyo

is it dejavu or liberation?
also, your fonts aren't properly spaced. Try OpenType Fonts

File: Skärmbild (1).png (158KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

158KB, 1366x768px

>>52532481

Yup

FF windows 10.

File: palemoon_2016-01-20_17-12-12.png (420KB, 1400x898px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

420KB, 1400x898px

Guess

File: Screenshot from 2016-01-20 18-14-19.png (535KB, 1877x1053px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

535KB, 1877x1053px

>>52532073

>>52533066
>filename
fucking ShareX giving me away

But yeah Gecko based engines are really fucking good at font rendering and chrome is so bad in this regard that I always prefer PM.

>>52533066
>bitmap moon runes
Windows?

>>52533065
Too bad Firefox is shit. I really want to use it because of its addons and features, but it is so slow ;_;