8350 is way stronger

>>52518534

>>52518435
Price is factored into the "overall score" so of course a $1000 CPU is going to suffer in terms of score.

>>52518435
Fx 8350 is a pretty great cpu overall. Integer performance is stronger than an i7, but it's a little lacking in floating point performance.

>>52519056
How the fuck is Haswell i5 beating Haswell i7?

>>52518435
cpu boss has always been bullshit, if you just figured this out now, maybe you are retarded

>>52519056
Wrong image, sorry.

Also don't forget the fx series were competing against Ivy bridge and sandy bridge.

>>52519064
Didn't that i7 have overheating issues?

>>52519070
>AMD's top of the line CPU can't keep up with Intel's mid-high-end offerings despite having twice the cores

>>52518435
Yes, the site is shit but that aint a benchmark, is the CPU rated for the price/perfomance.

>>52519212
Holy shit, fucking lost.
Good goi :')

>>52518435
I prefer passmark when it comes to real world results https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php

It shows you how many samples have been submitted and variations between tests.

>>52519578
Yea ive used passmark as a source for a while now. I just found cpuboss recently and was doing some comparisons when I found these shitty scores