Got my 980 GTX /g/, did I do good?
>>52511739
390X or fury Nano are better, the first even cheaper, and you could have waited for, you know, 2016 cards.
>>52511819
Hello amd shill.
>>52511739
>>52511819
AMD is a good consideration if you don't mind the occasional driver crashes.
>>52511915
390 here, what crashes are you running old drivers ?
Ya did good. They scale really well in sli when you need more power down the road.
>>52511915
Oh boy, it's 2010 again!
>>52511915
380 here. Bought one about a month after release. Zero crashes so far. Same for my old 6850. Same for my even older 4850.
What the fuck are you talking about, Nvidia shill?
Would a 390 be good enough for 1440p? I want to replace my gtx 760 but I don't have a lot of money.
>>52513124
yes if you turn off goywerks
>>52512993
>amd drivers haven't progressed since 2010
Sounds about right
>>52511739
>980gtx
>not infinitely superior higher-number 9800gtx
git gud
>>52514260
That's only 1 order of magnitude better.
>>52511819
>the rebranded 290x is better
wew lad
>>52513311
b-but we got a shiny new toy called Crimson which is super sleek and pretty except for the advanced features
>>52514260
this, op you fucked up
>>52511819
He does have a point, 980 series is literally outdated tech yet still retailing at full price. You should have waited for new shit that will be released in few months.
>>52514608
it's sad that the AMD rebrands are better than nvidia's new stuff but it's the truth.
>>52514720
For the price? Yes, but top of the range nvidia is still better.
>>52514748
nah. Xfire scaling and the FuryX is watercooled for the same price