>>52505852
Cheaper?

I don't know really.

I just want 3:2 displays. The squarer the better.

If tomorrow there was an ad saying that cool people eat shit indian streets would glisten from the saliva of the murrican normies hoping it'll impress their friends and bring them higher status

>>52505994
Nice meme

>>52506209
Thanks anon, you know how to make me feel special

>>52505852
What's the point in a 16:9 display when I can just run my 1200p CRT at 1600x1900?

After a month you won't like going back to 16:9.

>>52506413
Most decent 16:9 displays are at least 3840x2160.

>Pros

Price wise might be better, you can find 21:9 monitors for cheaper than 2k ones.

Movies and games are a different thing there. For compatible games shit's immersive. For movies, you get rid of the bars completely.

Some editing applications take advantage of it.

Might be a decent replacement for 2 monitors.

>Cons

Scaling doesn't work amazingly on OSX, I would suppose a 1440p ultrawide monitor would be better

Quite a few games are not compatible with this, gotta rely on mods

You better use displayport, otherwise you might run into issues

>>52506528
21:9 jew-sync monitors go for £800
1440p ones are £430

>>52505994
They are called apple fags anon, they eat the shit out of their own hands instead of the street

>>52506563
Like I said, "might". If you go cheap then the cheaper 21:9 LG monitors are still cheaper than the cheapest 16:9 2k monitors you can find. You can go as low as 170 bucks for a 21:9 monitor these days.